Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T01:32:52.883Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dallisgrass (Paspalum Dilatatum) Control with Foramsulfuron in Bermudagrass Turf

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gerald M. Henry*
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC; 27695
Fred H. Yelverton
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC; 27695
Michael G. Burton
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh NC; 27695
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: gmhenry@ncsu.edu

Abstract

Dallisgrass response to various MSMA and foramsulfuron herbicide combinations was evaluated from 2004 through 2006 in North Carolina. Dallisgrass control declined with herbicide rates; therefore, only the highest rates (foramsulfuron, 0.15 kg ai/ha; MSMA, 2.5 kg ai/ha) are discussed. Foramsulfuron followed by (fb) foramsulfuron 1 wk after initial treatment (WAIT) provided 60% control of dallisgrass 1 mo after initial treatment (MAIT), but control declined to 40% 3 MAIT. MSMA (2.5 kg ai/ha) applied three times provided 89% dallisgrass control 1 MAIT, but control declined to 71% 3 MAIT. Among 22 MSMA and foramsulfuron sequential application programs, MSMA fb foramsulfuron 2 WAIT fb MSMA 3 WAIT provided the highest control (94%) of dallisgrass 1 MAIT, and control levels remained high (93%) 3 MAIT. This herbicide program provided 85% control 1 yr after initial treatment (YAIT), whereas no other treatment provided greater than 37% control 1 YAIT. Timing of foramsulfuron application following the initial MSMA application affected the control of dallisgrass. Waiting 2 WAIT, rather than 1 WAIT, before applying foramsulfuron increased control of dallisgrass by 20% 1 MAIT and 19% 3 MAIT. However, the increase in control 1 YAIT was only 5% regardless of herbicide rate. The addition of a second application of MSMA following the application of foramsulfuron 2 WAIT of MSMA further increased control by 10% 1 MAIT, 37% 3 MAIT, and 48% 1 YAIT. Results from this study suggest dallisgrass may be controlled with applications of MSMA fb foramsulfuron 2 WAIT fb MSMA 3 WAIT applied during early to midsummer. The use of MSMA was required to achieve dallisgrass control, however, the relatively high level of control achieved 1 YAIT with a program including sequential applications of MSMA and foramsulfuron may help reduce the total amount of arsenical herbicides used to control dallisgrass infestations over time.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ashton, F. M. and Monaco, T. D. 1991. Weed Science. Principles and Practices. 3rd ed. New York J. Wiley. 266272.Google Scholar
Bunting, J. A., Sprague, C. L., and Riechers, D. E. 2004a. Absorption and activity of foramsulfuron in giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) and woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) with various adjuvants. Weed Sci. 52:513517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, J. A., Sprague, C. L., and Riechers, D. E. 2004b. Physiological basis for tolerance of corn hybrids to foramsulfuron. Weed Sci. 52:711717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busey, P. 2004. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) control with foramsulfuron in bermudagrass (Cynodon spp.) turf. Weed Technol. 18:634640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, L. J. and Forde, B. J. 1991. Comparative responses of three subtropical grasses to combined frost and prolonged chilling treatments simulating a New Zealand winter. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 34:249256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, G. M., Burton, M. G., and Yelverton, F. H. 2006a. Use of GPS and controlled environment experiments to examine factors affecting Paspalum species distribution. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:177.Google Scholar
Henry, G. M., Burton, M. G., and Yelverton, F. H. 2007. Effect of mowing on lateral spread and rhizome growth of troublesome Paspalum species. Weed Sci. 55:486490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, G. M., Burton, M. G., and Yelverton, F. H. 2006b. Response of dallisgrass and bahiagrass along a soil moisture gradient. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:11.Google Scholar
Hubbard, L. R., Estes, A. G., and McCarty, L. B. 2006. Revolver and MSMA for dallisgrass control in bermudagrass turf. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:128.Google Scholar
Loreti, J. and Oesterheld, M. 1996. Intraspecific variation in the resistance to flooding and drought in populations of Paspalum dilatatum from different topographic positions. Oecologia. 108:279284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarty, B. and Yelverton, F. 2005. Dealing with dallisgrass. Golf Course Manag. 73/7:8287.Google Scholar
McCullough, P. E., Hart, S. E., Askew, S., Dernoeden, P. H., Reicher, Z., and Weisenberger, D. 2006. Kentucky bluegrass control with postemergence herbicides. Hortscience 41:255258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McElroy, J. S., Breeden, G. K., Yelverton, F. H., Gannon, T. W., Askew, S. D., and Derr, J. F. 2005. Response of four improved seeded bermudagrass cultivars to postemergence herbicides during seeded establishment. Weed Technol. 19:979985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricker, D. B., Willis, J. B., McCall, D. S., and Askew, S. D. 2005. Dallisgrass control with foramsulfuron. Proc. Southern Weed Sci. Soc. 58:125. in.Google Scholar
Rubio, G., Casasola, G., and Lavado, R. S. 1995. Adaptations and biomass production of two grasses in response to waterlogging and soil nutrient enrichment. Oecologia. 102:102105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio, G. and Lavado, R. S. 1999. Acquisition and allocation of resources in two waterlogging- tolerant grasses. New Phytol. 143:539546.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed