Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:03:27.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - The evolving legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

François du Bois
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Antje du Bois-Pedain
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A crucial task for courts in transitional political systems is to establish institutional legitimacy. Without legitimacy and absent the proverbial powers of the purse and the sword, courts are dependent upon satisfying their constituents in order to gain compliance with (or acceptance of) their decisions. But no political institution can unerringly please its constituents. In order for courts to be relied upon to check the power of the governing majority, some mechanism must insulate judicial institutions from the displeasure of that majority (the so-called counter-majoritarian dilemma). Developing legitimacy – the belief that the institution has the right, or moral authority to make decisions – is essential if courts are to perform the role assigned to them by democratic theory.

Consequently, political scientists have examined the stores of legitimacy of courts throughout the world. The South African Constitutional Court in particular has been the object of considerable study, in part because South Africa faces difficult problems of reconciling vast majority power with the rights of political, racial and ethnic minorities. If South Africa is not to go the way of Africa's many illiberal democracies, then some institution must tame the will of the majority. Whether the Constitutional Court, itself a creature of the transition to democracy, is capable of performing such a function is a question of fundamental importance for South Africa's future political stability.

This chapter examines developments in the legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court over the period from 1997 to 2004.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A. and Baird, Vanessa, ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’ (1998) 92 American Political Science Review343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausegger, Lori and Riddell, Troy, ‘The Changing Nature of Public Support for the Supreme Court of Canada’ (2004) 37 Canadian Journal of Political Science23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Gouws, Amanda, Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? (Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2004)Google Scholar
Zakaria, Fareed, The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad (New York: W.W. Norton, 2003)Google Scholar
Thompson, Leonard and Prior, Andrew, South African Politics (Cape Town: David Philip, 1982))CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posel, Deborah, ‘What's In a Name? Racial Categorisations Under Apartheid and Their Afterlife’ (2001) 47 Transformation50Google Scholar
Hamilton, Charles V.et al. (eds.), Beyond Racism: Race and Inequality in Brazil, South Africa, and the United States (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001) 42.
Friedman, Lawrence M., American Law: An Introduction, revised and updated edition (New York: W.W. Norton, 1998)Google Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M., Law and Society: An Introduction (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977)Google Scholar
Lind, E. Allan and Tyler, Tom R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (London: Plenum Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R., Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
Baird, Vanessa A., ‘Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice’ (2001) 54 Political Research Quarterly333Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., ‘Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance’ (1989) 23 Law and Society Review469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. and Rasinski, Kenneth, ‘Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular US Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson’ (1991) 25 Law and Society Review621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., ‘Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance With Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality’ (1991) 25 Law and Society Review631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., ‘Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court’ (1986) 80 American Political Science Review1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Thomas, Public Opinion and the Supreme Court (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1989Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. and Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama, ‘The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court’ (1997) 59 Journal of Politics1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A., ‘Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support’ (1992) 54 Journal of Politics1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta, ‘Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court’ (2003) 47 American Journal of Political Science354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franklin, Charles and Kosaki, Liane C., ‘Republican Schoolmaster: The U. S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion’ (1989) 83 American Political Science Review751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kritzer, Herbert M., ‘The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of the Supreme Court’ (2001) 85 Judicature32.Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Joseph and Murphy, Walter F., ‘Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study’ (1981) 43 Journal of Politics24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., ‘The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion’ (2000) 94 American Political Science Review89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J., ‘Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality’ (1993) 27 Law and Society Review599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J., ‘The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion’ (1995) 23 American Politics Quarterly109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta, ‘The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?’ (2003) 33 British Journal of Political Science535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheb, John M. II and Lyons, William, ‘The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court’ (2000) 81 Social Science Quarterly928Google Scholar
O'Malley, Kierin, ‘The 1993 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa – The Constitutional Court’ (1996) 8 Journal of Theoretical Politics177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotzé, Dirk, ‘The New (Final) South African Constitution’ (1996) 8 Journal of Theoretical Politics133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Heinz, ‘Participating in the Design’ (1996) 3 Review of Constitutional Studies18Google Scholar
Wyk, Dawidet al. (eds.), Rights and Constitutionalism: The New South African Legal Order (Cape Town: Juta, 1995)Google Scholar
Ellmann, Stephen, In a Time of Trouble: Law and Liberty in South Africa's State of Emergency (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
Forsyth, C.F., In Danger for their Talents: A Study of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa from 1950–80 (Cape Town: Juta, 1985)Google Scholar
Corder, Hugh, Judges at Work (Cape Town: Juta, 1984)Google Scholar
Corder, Hugh, ‘Judicial Authority in a Changing South Africa’ (2004) 24 Legal Studies253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaaren, Jonathan, ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1995 Term’ (1996) 12 South African Journal on Human Rights39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaaren, Jonathan, ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1996 Term’ (1997) 13 South African Journal on Human Rights208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Lynn and Klaaren, Jonathan, ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1997 Term’ (1998) 14 South African Journal on Human Rights277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaaren, Jonathanet al., ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1998 Term’ (1999) 15 South African Journal on Human Rights256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, Hugh, ‘Establishing the Legitimacy for the Administration of Justice in South Africa’ (1995) 2 Stellenbosch Law Review202Google Scholar
Moerane, M.T.K., ‘The Meaning of Transformation of the Judiciary in the New South African Context’ (2003) 120 South African Law Journal663Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L., A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
Giliomee, Hermann and Simkins, Charles (eds.), The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1999)Google Scholar
Giliomee, Hermann, ‘Democratization in South Africa’ (1995) 110 Political Science Quarterly83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giliomee, Hermann, ‘South Africa's Emerging Dominant Party Regime’ (1998) 9 Journal of Democracy124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattes, Robertet al., ‘Judgment and Choice in the 1999 South African Election’ (1999) 26 Politikon: South African Journal of Political Science235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giliomee, Hermann and Schlemmer, Lawrence with Hauptfleisch, Sarita (eds.), The Bold Experiment: South Africa's New Democracy (Johannesburg: Southern Books, 1994)Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A., ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’ (1957) 6 Journal of Public Law279Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A., ‘Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court’ (2003) 65 Journal of Politics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L., ‘The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court’ (1992) 36 American Journal of Political Science635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L., ‘The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support’ (1995) 89 American Political Science Review356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A., ‘The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice’ (1995) 39 American Journal of Political Science459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. and Caldeira, Gregory A., ‘Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis’ (1998) 28 British Journal of Political Science63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, G. R. and Loewenberg, Gerhard, ‘The Development of Public Support for Parliament in Germany, 1951–1959’ (1973) 3 British Journal of Political Science169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A., ‘Public Opinion and The U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-Packing Plan’ (1987) 81 American Political Science Review1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haynie, Stacia L., Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950–1990 (New York: Peter Lang, 2003)Google Scholar
Loewenberg, Gerhard, ‘The Influence of Parliamentary Behavior on Regime Stability’ (1971) 3 Comparative Politics177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta, ‘Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment’ (2005) 58 Political Research Quarterly187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Inga, Imperfect Justice: An East-West German Diary (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
Abel, Richard L., Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle Against Apartheid, 1980–1994 (New York: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth, ‘Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be’ (2001) 95 American Political Science Review145Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth (eds.), What is it about Government that Americans Dislike? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Jung, Courtney, Then I was Black: South African Political Identities in Transition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Spitz, Richard and Chaskalson, Matthew, The Politics of Transition: A Hidden History of South Africa's Negotiated Settlement (Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press, 2000)Google Scholar
Albertyn, Catherine, ‘Judicial Independence and the Constitution Fourteenth Amendment Bill’ (2006) 22 South African Journal on Human Rights126CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×