Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Reconciliation as surrender: configurations of responsibility and memory
- 2 Radical forgiveness: transforming traumatic memory beyond Hannah Arendt
- 3 Communicating criminal and political responsibility in the TRC process
- 4 The contribution of criminal justice
- 5 Reparation and the forms of justice
- 6 Land restitution and reconciliation in South Africa
- 7 For justice and reconciliation to come: the TRC archive, big business and the demand for material reparations
- 8 Transition, forgiveness and citizenship: the TRC and the social construction of forgiveness
- 9 The evolving legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court
- 10 Drawing the line: justice and the art of reconciliation
- 11 Post-conflict justice and the reconciliatory paradigm: the South African experience
- Index
- References
9 - The evolving legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 July 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Reconciliation as surrender: configurations of responsibility and memory
- 2 Radical forgiveness: transforming traumatic memory beyond Hannah Arendt
- 3 Communicating criminal and political responsibility in the TRC process
- 4 The contribution of criminal justice
- 5 Reparation and the forms of justice
- 6 Land restitution and reconciliation in South Africa
- 7 For justice and reconciliation to come: the TRC archive, big business and the demand for material reparations
- 8 Transition, forgiveness and citizenship: the TRC and the social construction of forgiveness
- 9 The evolving legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court
- 10 Drawing the line: justice and the art of reconciliation
- 11 Post-conflict justice and the reconciliatory paradigm: the South African experience
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
A crucial task for courts in transitional political systems is to establish institutional legitimacy. Without legitimacy and absent the proverbial powers of the purse and the sword, courts are dependent upon satisfying their constituents in order to gain compliance with (or acceptance of) their decisions. But no political institution can unerringly please its constituents. In order for courts to be relied upon to check the power of the governing majority, some mechanism must insulate judicial institutions from the displeasure of that majority (the so-called counter-majoritarian dilemma). Developing legitimacy – the belief that the institution has the right, or moral authority to make decisions – is essential if courts are to perform the role assigned to them by democratic theory.
Consequently, political scientists have examined the stores of legitimacy of courts throughout the world. The South African Constitutional Court in particular has been the object of considerable study, in part because South Africa faces difficult problems of reconciling vast majority power with the rights of political, racial and ethnic minorities. If South Africa is not to go the way of Africa's many illiberal democracies, then some institution must tame the will of the majority. Whether the Constitutional Court, itself a creature of the transition to democracy, is capable of performing such a function is a question of fundamental importance for South Africa's future political stability.
This chapter examines developments in the legitimacy of the South African Constitutional Court over the period from 1997 to 2004.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Justice and Reconciliation in Post-Apartheid South Africa , pp. 229 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, and , ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’ (1998) 92 American Political Science Review343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Changing Nature of Public Support for the Supreme Court of Canada’ (2004) 37 Canadian Journal of Political Science23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Overcoming Intolerance in South Africa: Experiments in Democratic Persuasion (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation? (Cape Town: HSRC Press, 2004)Google Scholar
, The Future of Freedom: Illiberal Democracy at Home and Abroad (New York: W.W. Norton, 2003)Google Scholar
, ‘What's In a Name? Racial Categorisations Under Apartheid and Their Afterlife’ (2001) 47 Transformation50Google Scholar
et al. (eds.), Beyond Racism: Race and Inequality in Brazil, South Africa, and the United States (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001) 42.
, American Law: An Introduction, revised and updated edition (New York: W.W. Norton, 1998)Google Scholar
and , The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (London: Plenum Press, 1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Why People Obey the Law: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1990)Google Scholar
, ‘Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice’ (2001) 54 Political Research Quarterly333Google Scholar
, ‘Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance’ (1989) 23 Law and Society Review469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular US Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson’ (1991) 25 Law and Society Review621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Compliance With Supreme Court Decisions: A Question of Causality’ (1991) 25 Law and Society Review631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Neither the Purse Nor the Sword: Dynamics of Confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court’ (1986) 80 American Political Science Review1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Dynamics of Public Support for the Supreme Court’ (1997) 59 Journal of Politics1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Blacks and the United States Supreme Court: Models of Diffuse Support’ (1992) 54 Journal of Politics1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , ‘Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court’ (2003) 47 American Journal of Political Science354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Republican Schoolmaster: The U. S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion’ (1989) 83 American Political Science Review751CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
, ‘The Impact of Bush v. Gore on Public Perceptions and Knowledge of the Supreme Court’ (2001) 85 Judicature32.Google Scholar
and , ‘Patterns of Public Support for the Supreme Court: A Panel Study’ (1981) 43 Journal of Politics24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion’ (2000) 94 American Political Science Review89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality’ (1993) 27 Law and Society Review599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Supreme Court and Opinion Change: An Experimental Study of the Court's Ability to Change Opinion’ (1995) 23 American Politics Quarterly109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , ‘The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?’ (2003) 33 British Journal of Political Science535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
II and , ‘The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court’ (2000) 81 Social Science Quarterly928Google Scholar
, ‘The 1993 Constitution of the Republic of South Africa – The Constitutional Court’ (1996) 8 Journal of Theoretical Politics177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The New (Final) South African Constitution’ (1996) 8 Journal of Theoretical Politics133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al. (eds.), Rights and Constitutionalism: The New South African Legal Order (Cape Town: Juta, 1995)Google Scholar
, In a Time of Trouble: Law and Liberty in South Africa's State of Emergency (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)Google Scholar
, In Danger for their Talents: A Study of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of South Africa from 1950–80 (Cape Town: Juta, 1985)Google Scholar
, ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1995 Term’ (1996) 12 South African Journal on Human Rights39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1996 Term’ (1997) 13 South African Journal on Human Rights208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1997 Term’ (1998) 14 South African Journal on Human Rights277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Constitutional Court Statistics for the 1998 Term’ (1999) 15 South African Journal on Human Rights256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Establishing the Legitimacy for the Administration of Justice in South Africa’ (1995) 2 Stellenbosch Law Review202Google Scholar
, ‘The Meaning of Transformation of the Judiciary in the New South African Context’ (2003) 120 South African Law Journal663Google Scholar
, A Democratic South Africa?: Constitutional Engineering in a Divided Society (Cape Town: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar
and (eds.), The Awkward Embrace: One-Party Domination and Democracy (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1999)Google Scholar
, ‘South Africa's Emerging Dominant Party Regime’ (1998) 9 Journal of Democracy124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Judgment and Choice in the 1999 South African Election’ (1999) 26 Politikon: South African Journal of Political Science235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and with (eds.), The Bold Experiment: South Africa's New Democracy (Johannesburg: Southern Books, 1994)Google Scholar
, ‘Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker’ (1957) 6 Journal of Public Law279Google Scholar
and , ‘Defenders of Democracy? Legitimacy, Popular Acceptance, and the South African Constitutional Court’ (2003) 65 Journal of Politics1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court’ (1992) 36 American Journal of Political Science635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support’ (1995) 89 American Political Science Review356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Legitimacy of Transnational Legal Institutions: Compliance, Support, and the European Court of Justice’ (1995) 39 American Journal of Political Science459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Changes in the Legitimacy of the European Court of Justice: A Post-Maastricht Analysis’ (1998) 28 British Journal of Political Science63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Development of Public Support for Parliament in Germany, 1951–1959’ (1973) 3 British Journal of Political Science169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Public Opinion and The U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-Packing Plan’ (1987) 81 American Political Science Review1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Judging in Black and White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950–1990 (New York: Peter Lang, 2003)Google Scholar
, ‘The Influence of Parliamentary Behavior on Regime Stability’ (1971) 3 Comparative Politics177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , ‘Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment’ (2005) 58 Political Research Quarterly187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Imperfect Justice: An East-West German Diary (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, Politics by Other Means: Law in the Struggle Against Apartheid, 1980–1994 (New York: Routledge, 1995)Google Scholar
and , Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes Toward American Political Institutions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Process Preferences and American Politics: What the People Want Government to Be’ (2001) 95 American Political Science Review145Google Scholar
and (eds.), What is it about Government that Americans Dislike? (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
, Then I was Black: South African Political Identities in Transition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
and , The Politics of Transition: A Hidden History of South Africa's Negotiated Settlement (Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, ‘Judicial Independence and the Constitution Fourteenth Amendment Bill’ (2006) 22 South African Journal on Human Rights126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3
- Cited by