Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T17:19:31.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response of Oat (Avena sativa) Varieties and Wild Radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) to Thifensulfuron plus Tribenuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David W. Fischer*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Edward S. Oplinger
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Timothy S. Maloney
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: dwfischer@students.wisc.edu.

Abstract

Field studies evaluated wild radish control in oat with thifensulfuron plus tribenuron in 1995 and 1997. Thifensulfuron plus tribenuron at 16 or 21 g ai/ha controlled wild radish completely in both years. In tolerance studies conducted in 1995 and 1996, thifensulfuron plus tribenuron reduced vigor of ‘Bay,’ ‘Belle,’ ‘Dane,’ ‘Ensiler,’ ‘Gem,’ ‘Horicon,’ ‘Ogle,’ ‘Porter,’ and ‘Prairie’ oat varieties and Wisconsin test selection oat ‘X6396-1’ up to 25% 7 d after treatment (DAT), but all chlorotic symptoms had disappeared 28 DAT. Thifensulfuron plus tribenuron reduced oat height 13 to 19% in 1995 and 21 to 24% in 1996 7 DAT. Bay, Belle, Dane, Ensiler, Horicon, Prairie, and X6396-1 recovered from height reductions by 28 DAT in 1995; however, in 1996 only Horicon and Porter recovered. Thifensulfuron plus tribenuron did not reduce 1995 grain yields, but 1996 Bay and Porter grain yields were reduced 29 and 15%, respectively. Dane and Prairie seed weights were reduced 7 and 14%, respectively, in 1995, whereas no seed weight reduction occurred in 1996.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1996. Rules for Testing Seeds. Lincoln, NE: Association of Official Seed Analysts. 16. p. 54.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1997. Wisconsin Seed Certification Standards. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Crop Improvement Association. p. 29.Google Scholar
Baker, T. K. and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Differential tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to cyanazine and triazinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:569575.Google Scholar
Blair, A. M. and Martin, T. D. 1988. A review of the activity, fate and mode of action of sulfonylurea herbicides. Pestic. Sci. 22:195219.Google Scholar
Cheam, A. H. 1986. Seed production and seed dormancy in wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) and some possibilities for improving control. Weed Res. 26:405413.Google Scholar
Code, G. R. and Donaldson, T. W. 1996. Effect of cultivation, sowing methods and herbicides on wild radish populations in wheat crops. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36:437442.Google Scholar
Doll, J. D. 1988. Wild radish control in oats. In Wisconsin Weed Control Results. Volume 18. 1988. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison Cooperative Extension Programs. pp. D-19–22.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1990. Factors influencing winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) injury from sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:724730.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. D. and Moore, H. D. 1974. Livestock-Poisoning Vascular Plants of Alabama. Auburn, AL: Auburn University Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 460. 79 p.Google Scholar
Hale, O. M. and Utley, P. R. 1985. Effects of feeding wheat contaminated with wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 61:11721177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, J. W. 1961. Poisonous plants of North Carolina. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 414. 128 p.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., and Krenzer, E. G. Jr. 1996. Sulfonylurea herbicides affect hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) forage and grain yield. Weed Technol. 10:531534.Google Scholar
Lafond, G. P. and Baker, R. J. 1986. Effects of genotype and seed size on speed of emergence and seedling vigor in nine spring wheat cultivars. Crop Sci. 26:341346.Google Scholar
Liu, S. H., Hsiao, A. I., and Quick, W. A. 1994. Interaction between imazamethabenz and fenoxaprop in wild oat control and crop tolerance. Crop Prot. 13:525530.Google Scholar
Mathiassen, S. K. and Kudsk, P. 1993. Joint action of sulfonylurea herbicides and MCPA. Weed Res. 33:441447.Google Scholar
Mathur, P. N., Sinha, N. C., and Singh, R. P. 1982. Effect of seed size on germination and seed vigor in oat (Avena sativa L.). Seed Res. 10:109113.Google Scholar
Oplinger, E. S., Wiersma, D. W., Grau, C. R., and Kelling, K. A. 1985. Intensive wheat management. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Service Bull. A3337. 18 p.Google Scholar
Schroeder, J. 1989. Wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum) control in soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 37:112116.Google Scholar
Sweetser, P. B., Schow, G. S., and Hutchison, J. M. 1982. Metabolism of chlorsulfuron by plants: biological basis for selectivity of a new herbicide for cereals. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 17:1823.Google Scholar
York, A. C., Turner, S. M., and Jarrett, R. E. 1994. Triticale (X Triticosecale Wittmack) response to herbicides. Weed Technol. 8:119123.Google Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415421.Google Scholar