Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T20:12:15.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) Control and Tuber Yield with Glyphosate and Glufosinate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kelly A. Nelson ,
Karen A. Renner  and
Donald Penner
Kelly A. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Missouri, Novelty, MO 63460
Karen A. Renner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Donald Penner
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and field research was conducted to determine the effect of glufosinate, glyphosate, and glyphosate plus additional adjuvant on yellow nutsedge control and tuber production. Glyphosate at 0.84 kg/ha reduced yellow nutsedge dry weight 64%, whereas glufosinate at 0.4 kg/ha reduced dry weight only 22% when averaged over diammonium sulfate (DAS) and spray volume. Furthermore, yellow nutsedge dry weight was reduced 53% in the presence and 34% in the absence of DAS; however, dry weights were similar when spray volumes of glufosinate or glyphosate ranged from 140 to 1038 L/ha. Yellow nutsedge control with glyphosate and glufosinate increased to 88 and 68%, respectively, when the herbicides were injected into the plant. In the field, glufosinate at 0.4 kg/ha and glyphosate at 0.84 kg/ha controlled yellow nutsedge 19 and 53%, respectively. Glyphosate reduced yellow nutsedge tuber density 51%, tuber fresh weight 59%, and tuber sprouting 17% 42 wk after treatment in the field. The addition of nonionic surfactant, methylated seed oil, or crop oil concentrate to glyphosate plus DAS did not increase yellow nutsedge control with glyphosate in the greenhouse or field.

Keywords

Crop oil concentratediammonium sulfatedose–responseglufosinateglyphosatemethylated seed oilnonionic surfactantyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. #3 CYPESPerennial weedspray volumetuber productionCOC, crop oil concentrateDAS, diammonium sulfate ((NH4)2SO4)GR50, rate causing 50% growth reductionMSO, methylated seed oilNIS, nonionic surfactantWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 360 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Appleby, A. P. and Paller, E. C. 1978. Effect of naptalam on growth of yellow nutsedge and subsequent control with glyphosate. Weed Res. 18: 247–253.Google Scholar
Bariuan, J. V., Reddy, K. N., and Wills, G. D. 1999. Glyphosate injury, rainfastness, absorption, and translocation in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Technol. 13: 112–119.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1989. HOE-39866 use in chemical fallow system. Weed Technol. 3: 420–428.Google Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybeans (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31: 124–130.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1987. Effects of application variables on glyphosate phytotoxicity. Weed Technol. 1: 14–17.Google Scholar
Claus, J. S. and Behrens, R. 1976. Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci. 24: 149–152.Google Scholar
Darwent, A. L., Kirkland, K. J., Baig, M. N., and Lefkovitch, L. P. 1994. Preharvest applications of glyphosate for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control. Weed Technol. 8: 477–482.Google Scholar
Derr, J. F. and Wilcut, J. W. 1993. Control of yellow and purple nutsedges (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus) in nursery crops. Weed Technol. 7: 112–117.Google Scholar
Donn, G. 1982. Der einfluss von klimafaktoren auf die herbizide wirkung von ammonium-(3-amino-3-carboxy-propyl)-methylphosphinat (glufosinate). Meded. Fac. Landbouwwet. Rijksuniv. Gent. 47: 105–110.Google Scholar
Fischer, D. W. and Harvey, R. G. 1998. Yellow nutsedge control with glyphosate and halosulfuron in glyphosate-tolerant corn. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc. 53: 62–63.Google Scholar
Higgins, J. M., Whitwell, T., and Toler, J. E. 1991. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control with non-selective herbicides. Weed Technol. 5: 884–886.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing. pp. 125–133.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. and Orcutt, D. R. 1996. Temperature thresholds for bud sprouting in perennial weeds and seed germination in cotton. Weed Sci. 44: 523–533.Google Scholar
Jordan, T. N. 1977. Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon). Weed Sci. 25: 448–451.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. J. 1985. Influence of glyphosate on resprouting of parent tubers of Cyperus esculentus . Weed Sci. 34: 25–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1996. Control of annual weeds with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 10: 957–962.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., Matthews, J. L., Baldwin, J. L., and Maschoff, J. 1999. Evalutation of glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays) and glufosinate: efficacy on annual weeds. Weed Technol. 13: 691–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuehl, R. O. 1994. Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press. 686 p.Google Scholar
Pereira, W. and Crabtree, G. 1986. Absorption, translocation, and toxicity of glyphosate and oxyfluorfen in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Sci. 34: 923–929.Google Scholar
Salisbury, C. D., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1991. Ammonium sulfate enhancement of glyphosate and SC-0224 control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Technol. 5: 18–21.Google Scholar
Schabenberger, O., Tharp, B. E., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1999. Statistical tests for hormesis and effective dosages in herbicide dose response. Agron. J. 91: 713–721.Google Scholar
Schippers, P., Borg, S.J.T., and Bos, J. J. 1995. A revision of the infraspecific taxonomy of Cyperus esculentus (yellow nutsedge) with an experimentally evaluated character set. Syst. Bot. 20: 461–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of 2,4-D and glyphosate in hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum). Weed Sci. 28: 13–20.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1997a. Absorption and translocation of glufosinate on four weed species. Weed Sci. 45: 378–381.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J., Wax, L. M., Simmons, F. W., and Phillips, W. H. II. 1997b. Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol. 11: 484–488.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Matthiesen, R. L. 1975. Response of yellow nutsedge and soybeans to bentazon, glyphosate, and perfluidone. Weed Sci. 23: 215–221.Google Scholar
Suwunnamek, U. and Parker, C. 1975. Control of Cyperus rotundus with glyphosate: the influence of ammonium sulphate and other additives. Weed Res. 15: 13–20.Google Scholar
Tharp, B. E., Schabenberger, O., and Kells, J. J. 1999. Response of annual weed species to glufosinate and glyphosate. Weed Technol. 13: 542–547.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar absorption of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4: 215–231.Google Scholar
Zandstra, B. H., Teo, C.K.H., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1974. Response of purple nutsedge to repeat applications of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 22: 230–232.Google Scholar