Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:30:32.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can Big Five Facets Distinguish between Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being? A Dominance Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 November 2016

Rosario J. Marrero ,
Mar Rey  and
Juan Andrés Hernández-Cabrera
Rosario J. Marrero*
Affiliation:
Universidad de la Laguna (Spain)
Mar Rey
Affiliation:
Universidad de la Laguna (Spain)
Juan Andrés Hernández-Cabrera
Affiliation:
Universidad de la Laguna (Spain)
*
*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Rosario J. Marrero Quevedo. Dept. of Clinical Psychology, Psychobiology and Methodology. Faculty of Psychology. Universidad de La Laguna. Campus de Guajara, s/n. 38205. Tenerife (Spain). E-mail: rmarrero@ull.edu.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, the aim was to analyze the relative importance of Five-Factor Model (FFM) personality facets for eudaimonic or psychological well-being (PWB) and hedonic or subjective well-being (SWB) through dominance analyses. The participants were 1,403 adult residents of Spain (mean age 37.2 years, SD = 13.9). As expected, facets captured a substantial proportion of the variance in PWB and SWB, with PWB being better predicted than SWB (explaining around 36–55% of the variance of PWB vs. 25% of the variance of SWB). Some facets were common to both types of well-being such as depression (explaining between 5–33% of the variance), vulnerability (explaining between 4–21% of the variance), positive emotions (explaining between 2-9% of the variance) and achievement striving (explaining between 2–10% of the variance), whereas others made a unique contribution according to type of well-being. Certain facets had a greater relative importance for women’s well-being -e.g., positive emotions explained 9% of the variance of self-acceptance for women vs. 3% for men- and others for men’s well-being -e.g., achievement striving explained 9% of the variance of personal growth for men vs. 2% for women-. The present results contribute to the literature by identifying which Big Five facets showed greater relative importance in explaining and distinguishing between PWB and SWB for women and men.

Keywords

big fivedominance analysespsychological well-beingsubjective well-being
Type
Research Article
Information
The Spanish Journal of Psychology , Volume 19 , 2016 , E84
Copyright
Copyright © Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos de Madrid 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anglim, J., & Grant, S. L. (2014). Incremental criterion prediction of personality facets over factors: Obtaining unbiased estimates and confidence intervals. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 148–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.10.005 Google Scholar
Anusic, I., & Schimmack, U. (2015). Stability and change of personality traits, self-esteem, and well-being: Introducing the meta-analytic stability and change model of retest correlations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000066 Google Scholar
Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8, 129–148. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129 Google Scholar
Bylsma, L. M., Morris, B. H., & Rottenberg, J. (2008). A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 676–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.001 Google Scholar
Chen, F. F., Jing, Y., Hayes, A., & Lee, J. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1033–1068. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9367-x Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1999). Inventario de Personalidad Neo Revisado (NEO PI-R) e Inventario Neo Reducido de Cinco Factores (NEO-FFI). Manual Profesional [Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual]. Madrid, Spain: Tea Ediciones, S.A.Google Scholar
Díaz, D., Rodríguez-Carvajal, R., Blanco, A., Moreno-Jiménez, B., Gallardo, I., Valle, C., & van Dierendonck, D. (2006). Validación española de las escalas de bienestar psicológico de Ryff. Psicothema, 18, 572–577. http://www.psicothema.com/psicothema.asp?id=3255 Google Scholar
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Google Scholar
Ebert, I. D., Steffens, M. C., & Kroth, A. (2014). Warm, but maybe not so competent?-Contemporary implicit stereotypes of women and men in Germany. Sex Roles, 70, 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0369-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenlohr-Moul, T., & Segerstrom, S. (2013). Autonomy, positive relationships, and IL-6: Evidence for gender-specific effects. British Journal of Health Psychology, 18, 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02085.x CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A. M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S., & Penn, D. L. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 849–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.002 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grömping, U. (2006). Relative importance for linear regression in R: The package relaimpo. Journal of Statistical Software, 17, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v017.i01 Google Scholar
Hounkpatin, H. O., Wood, A. M., Boyce, C. J., & Dunn, G. (2015). An existential-humanistic view of personality change: Co-occurring changes with psychological well-being in a 10 year cohort study. Social Indicators Research, 121, 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0648-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 Google Scholar
Keyes, C. L. M., Kendler, K. S., Myers, J. M., & Martin, C. C. (2015). The genetic overlap and distinctiveness of flourishing and the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16, 655–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-014-9527-2 Google Scholar
Keyes, C. L. M., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007 Google Scholar
Korn, C. W., Sharot, T., Walter, H., Heekeren, H. R., & Dolan, R. J. (2014). Depression is related to an absence of optimistically biased belief updating about future life events. Psychological Medicine, 44, 579–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291713001074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, R., Denissen, J. J. A., Allemand, M., & Penke, L. (2013). Age and gender differences in motivational manifestations of the Big Five from age 16 to 60. Developmental Psychology, 49, 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028277 Google Scholar
Marrero, R. J., & Carballeira, M. (2011). Well-being and personality: Facet-level analyses. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.030 Google Scholar
Marrero, R. J., & Carballeira, M. (2012). The contribution of personality to PWB: An exploratory study. In Nguyem, B. S. (Ed.), Psychology of satisfaction (pp. 41–65). New York, NY: NOVA.Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.5.509 Google Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal features of personality traits from the observer’s perspective: Data from 50 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 547–561. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McLean, C. P., & Anderson, E. R. (2009). Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 496–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.003 Google Scholar
McLeod, A. I., & Xu, C. (2010). Bestglm: Best subset GLM. R package, version 0.34. Ontario: Canada. Retrieved from University of Western. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bestglm Google Scholar
Nathans, L. L., Oswald, F. L., & Nimon, K. (2012). Interpreting multiple linear regression: A guidebook of variable importance. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17, 2–19. http://hdl.handle.net/1911/71096 Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of PWB. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069 Google Scholar
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological well-being revisited: Advances in the science and practice of eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353263 Google Scholar
Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., Furr, R. M., & Funder, D. C. (2004). Personality and life satisfaction: A facet-level analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1062–1075. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264292 Google Scholar
Schmutte, P. S., & Ryff, C. D. (1997). Personality and well-being: Reexamining methods and meanings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.3.549 Google Scholar
Siegler, I. C., & Brummett, B. H. (2000). Associations among NEO personality assessments and well-being at midlife: Facet-level analyses. Psychology and Aging, 15, 710–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.710 Google Scholar
Soto, C. J. (2015). Is happiness good for your personality? Concurrent and prospective relations of the Big Five with subjective well-being. Journal of Personality, 83, 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12081 Google Scholar
Soto, C. J., John, O. P., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2011). Age differences in personality traits from 10 to 65: Big Five domains and facets in a large cross-sectional sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021717 Google Scholar
Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 138–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vázquez, C., Duque, A., & Hervás, G. (2013). Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 16, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2013.82 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 Google Scholar
Wood, A. M., & Joseph, S. (2010). The absence of positive psychological (eudemonic) well-being as a risk factor for depression: A ten year cohort study. Journal of Affective Disorders, 122, 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.06.032 Google Scholar
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.699 Google Scholar