Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:49:30.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Early Co-axial Field Systems on the East Anglian Boulder Clays

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2014

Tom Williamson*
Affiliation:
Centre of East Anglian Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ

Abstract

In some areas of Britain landscape reorganization in the post-Roman period has not destroyed earlier systems of land division, which have instead been preserved in modern arrangements. Topographic analysis of landscapes on the heavier soils of East Anglia reveals sometimes very extensive co-axial field systems of probable later prehistoric origin. Other such systems, however, are probably of later date. Co-axial planning may be not a continuous tradition of landscape organization, but rather a recurringly adopted solution to the problem of competing claims to large areas of open land.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bassett, S. J., 1985. ‘Beyond the edge of excavation: the topographical context of Goltho’, in Mayr-Harting, H. and Moore, R. I. (eds), Studies in Medieval History Presented to R. H. C. Davis, 1139. London.Google Scholar
Bigmore, P., 1973, Suffolk Settlement: a study in continuity. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Bonney, D. J., 1966. ‘Pagan Saxon burials and boundaries in Wiltshire’, Wilts. Archaeol. Nat. Hist. Mag. 61, 1530.Google Scholar
Bonney, D. J., 1972, ‘Early boundaries in Wessex’, in Fowler, P. J. (ed.), Archaeology and the Landscape: essays for L. V. Grinsell, 168–86. London.Google Scholar
Bradley, R. and Ellison, A., 1975. Rams Hill: a Bronze Age Defended Enclosure and its Landscape. British Archaeological Reports British Series 19. Oxford.Google Scholar
Caulfield, S., 1978. ‘Neolithic fields: the Irish evidence’, in Bowen, H. C. and Fowler, P. J. (eds), Early Land Allotment, 137–43. British Archaeological Reports British Series 48. Oxford.Google Scholar
Drury, P. J. and Rodwell, W., 1980. ‘Late Iron Age and Roman settlement’, in Buckley, D. G. (ed.), The Archaeology of Essex to AD 1500, 5975. Council for British Archaeology, London.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 1978. ‘The prehistoric landscape of Dartmoor. Part 1: south Dartmoor’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 44, 97114.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 1983. ‘The prehistoric landscape of Dartmoor. Part 2: north and east Dartmoor’, Proc. Prehist. Soc. 49, 195241.Google Scholar
Fleming, A., 1984. ‘The prehistoric landscape of Dartmoor: wider implications’, Landscape Hist. 6, 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D., 1980. ‘The origins of open field agriculture: the archaeological fieldwork evidence’, in Rowley, T. (ed.), The Origins of Open Field Agriculture, 2238. London.Google Scholar
Hall, D., 1982. Medieval Fields. Aylesbury.Google Scholar
Hoskins, W. G., 1967. Fieldwork in Local History. London.Google Scholar
Margary, I., 1955. Roman Roads in Britain, Vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Martin, O., Plouviez, J. and Feldman, H., 1986. ‘Archaeology in Suffolk 1985’, Proc. Suffolk Inst. Archaeol. Hist. 36 (2), 139–56.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. F., 1878. ‘Notes on ancient roads’, Archaeol. J. 35, 169–75.Google Scholar
Pryor, F., 1978. Excavations at Fengate, Peterborough, England: Second Report. Royal Ontario Museum of Archaeology Monograph No. 3, Toronto.Google Scholar
Rackham, O., 1976. Trees and Woodland in the British Landscape. London.Google Scholar
Rackham, O., 1986a. ‘The Ancient Woods of Norfolk’, Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 27, 161–77.Google Scholar
Rackham, O., 1986b. History of the Countryside. London.Google Scholar
Riley, D. N., 1980. Early Landscapes from the Air. Sheffield.Google Scholar
Rodwell, W., 1978. ‘Relict landscapes in Essex’, in Bowen, H. C. and Fowler, P.J. (eds), Early Land Allotment, 8998. British Archaeological Reports British Series 48. Oxford.Google Scholar
Scarfe, N., 1986. Suffolk in the Middle Ages. Ipswich.Google Scholar
Soil Survey of England and Wales, 1984. Soils and their Use in Eastern England, 117–22. Harpenden.Google Scholar
Taylor, C., 1972. ‘The study of settlement patterns in pre-Saxon Britain’, in Ucko, P. J., Tringham, R. and Dimbleby, G. W. (eds), Man, Settlement, and Urbanism, 109–13. London.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. and Fowler, P. J., 1978. ‘Roman fields into medieval furlongs?’, in Bowen, H. C. and Fowler, P. J. (eds), Early Land Allotment, 159–62. British Archaeological Reports British Series 48. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wade-Martins, P., 1975. ‘The origins of rural settlement in East Anglia’, in Fowler, P. J. (ed.), Recent Work in Rural Archaeology, 137–57. Bradford on Avon.Google Scholar
Wade-Martins, P., 1980. Village sites in the Launditch Hundred. East Anglian Archaeology 10.Google Scholar
Warner, P. M., 1982. The Blything Hundred. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leicester.Google Scholar
Warner, P., 1983. ‘Origins: the example of green-side settlement in East Suffolk’, Medieval Village Research Group Bulletin 31, 4244.Google Scholar
Williamson, T., 1984. ‘The Roman countryside: settlement and agriculture in N.W. Essex’, Britannia 15, 225–30.Google Scholar
Williamson, T., 1985. ‘Sites in the landscape: approaches to the post-Roman settlement of south-eastern England’, Archaeol. Rev. Cambridge 4(1), 5164.Google Scholar
Williamson, T., 1986a. ‘The Development of settlement in N.W. Essex: the results of a recent field survey’, Essex Archaeol. Hist. 17.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. 1986b. ‘Parish boundaries and early fields: continuity and discontinuity’, J. Hist. Geog. 12, 241–48.Google Scholar
Williamson, T. and Bellamy, L., 1983. Ley Lines in Question. London.Google Scholar
Yelling, J. A., 1977. Common Field and Enclosure in England 1450–1850. London.Google Scholar