Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:07:38.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Network Research in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2019

Ronald S. Burt Open the ORCID record for Ronald S. Burt [Opens in a new window]  and
Bat Batjargal
Ronald S. Burt*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, USA
Bat Batjargal
Affiliation:
Oklahoma State University, USA
*
Corresponding author: Ronald S. Burt (ron.burt@chicagobooth.edu)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Using recent substantive results on China and the West, we highlight some virtues to Mill's method of residues for comparative network research. The result is research that combines the emic-etic approaches discussed by Leung (2009) with the spirit of Whetten's (2009: 49) efforts to make ‘theory borrowing more context sensitive’. We draw on recent comparative research about the competitive advantage enjoyed by network brokers, trust facilitated by embedding a relationship in a closed network, the subset of Chinese relations that constitute guanxi, the idea of American and European guanxi, different business environments maintained by the same network mechanism, cocoon networks, small-world networks, the longer history apparent in Chinese networks, and job search via colleagues, friends, and family. We also illustrate the value of data graphs for the expository value of the method of residuals in comparative network analyses.

摘要

基于新进关于中国和西方的大量结果，我们强调Mill关于比较网络研究的残差方法所具有的优点。了主位研究方法与客位研究方法。本着Whetten (2009: 49)努力让“理论更加具有情境敏感性”的精神，我们结合了梁觉（Leung, 2009）所讨论的主位-客位研究方法。我们利用了近来大量的比较研究，包括网络中间人享受的竞争优势，将关系嵌入封闭网络中而产生的信任，中国关系的子集，美国和欧洲关于关系的理念，由同样的网络机制、蚕茧式网络、小世界网络所维系的不同商务环境，中国网络中显现的较长历史，以及通过同事、朋友和家庭进行的求职。我们还说明了在比较网络分析中数据图形在解释残差方法中的价值。

Аннотация

На основании последних значительных исследований в Китае и на Западе, мы выделяем некоторые достоинства метода остатков Милля для сравнительного анализа социальных связей. В результате появилось исследование, которое сочетает эмически-этический подход, который развивал Леунг (2009), с усилиями Уеттена (2009: 49), направленными на то, чтобы сделать «применение теории более чувствительным к контексту». Мы опираемся на свежие сравнительные исследования о конкурентном преимуществе посредников в социальных отношениях; укреплении доверия за счет встраивания взаимоотношений в закрытую сеть; структуре отношений в Китае, которые составляют guanxi; понятии американского и европейского guanxi; различных условиях ведения бизнеса, которые существуют на основе одинакового механизма социальных связей; коконных сетей; социальных связей в тесном мире; долгой истории социальных отношений в Китае; а также поиске работы с помощью коллег, друзей и членов семьи. Мы также подчеркиваем особое значение графического изображения данных для визуализации метода остатков в сравнительном анализе социальных связей.

Resumen

Usando los resultados fundamentales recientes en China y Occidente, destacamos algunas virtudes del método de residuos de Mill para la investigación comparativa de redes. El resultado es una investigación que combina los enfoques de emic y etic discutidos por Leung (2009) con el espíritu de los esfuerzos de Whetten (2009: 49) para hacer que “los préstamos de teorías sean más sensibles al contexto”. Nos basamos en investigaciones comparativas recientes sobre la ventaja competitiva de los corredores de redes, confianza facilitada por la incorporación de una relación en una red cerrada, el subconjunto de relaciones chinas que constituyen guanxi, la idea de guanxi estadounidense y europeo, diferentes entornos empresariales mantenidos por el mismo mecanismo de red, redes de capullo, redes de mundo pequeño, la historia más larga que se observa en las redes chinas y la búsqueda de empleo a través de colegas, amigos y familiares. También ilustramos el valor de los gráficos de datos para el valor divulgativo del método de residuos en los análisis comparativos de redes.

Keywords

business strategyChinese managemententrepreneurshipnetwork analysisorganizational theoryprivate-owned enterprisessocial networks商务策略中国管理创业网络分析组织理论私营企业社会网络стратегия ведения бизнесакитайский менеджментпредпринимательствосетевой анализтеория организациичастные предприятиясоциальные связиestrategia de negociosgestión chinaemprendimientoanálisis de redesteoría organizacionalempresas privadasredes sociales
Type
Article
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2019 , pp. 3 - 29
Copyright
Copyright © The International Association for Chinese Management Research 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Accepted by: Editor-in-Chief Arie Y. Lewin

References

REFERENCES

Abel, P. 1989. Review of the comparative method. International Review of Social History, 34(1): 103–109.Google Scholar
Acheson, J. M. 1988. The lobster gangs of Maine. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Barker, J. R. 1993. Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3): 408–437.Google Scholar
Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B. 2007a. Comparative social capital: Networks of entrepreneurs and venture capitalists in China and Russia. Management and Organization Review, 3(3): 397–419.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B. 2007b. Network triads: Transitivity, referral and venture capital decisions in China and Russia. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6): 998–1012.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B. 2007c. Internet entrepreneurship: Social capital, human capital, and performance of Internet ventures in China. Research Policy, 36(5): 605–618.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B. 2010. The effects of network's structural holes: Polycentric institutions, product portfolio, and new venture growth in China and Russia. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 146–163.Google Scholar
Batjargal, B., Hitt, M. A., Tsui, A. S., Arregle, J.-L., Webb, J. W., & Miller, T. L. 2013. Institutional polycentrism, entrepreneur's social networks, and new venture growth. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4): 1024–1049.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L. 1992. Opting out of the legal system: Extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. Journal of Legal Studies, 21(1): 115–157.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. 1997. Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review, 62(June): 366–385.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. 2017. The comparative significance of guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 13(2): 261–267.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. 2018. The prevalence and increasing significance of guanxi. China Quarterly, 235: 597–621.Google Scholar
Bian, Y. 2019. Guanxi, how China works. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bian, Y., & Ang, S. 1997. Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3): 981–1005.Google Scholar
Bian, Y., Hao, M., & Li, Y. 2017. Social networks and subjective well-being: A comparison of Australia, Britain, and China. Journal of Happiness Studies, DOI 10.1007/s10902-017-9926-2.Google Scholar
Boisot, M., & Child, J. 1996. From fiefs to clans and network capitalism: Explaining China's emerging economic order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 600–628.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. L. 2009. On the duality of cases and variables: Correspondence analysis (CA) and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). In Byrne, D. & Ragin, C. C. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of case-based methods: 243–259. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2): 339–365.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1998. The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1): 5–46.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2): 349–399.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2005. Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2010. Neighbor networks: Competitive advantage local and personal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2018. Life course and network advantage in organizations: Peak and transitional ages. In Alwin, D. F., Felmlee, D. H., & Kreager, D. (Eds.), Social networks and the life course: 67–87. Basel, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2019a. Network disadvantaged entrepreneurs: Density, hierarchy, and success in China and the West. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(1): 19–50.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 2019b. A note on the networks and success of female entrepreneurs in China. Working Paper, Booth School of Business, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Burzynska, K. 2017. Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 12(2): 221–260.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Merluzzi, J. 2014. Embedded brokerage: Hubs versus locals. In Borgatti, S. P., Brass, D. J., Halgin, D. S., Labianca, G., & Mehra, A. (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations: 161–177. Cambridge, MA: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., & Opper, S. 2017. Early network events in the later success of Chinese entrepreneurs. Management and Organization Review, 12(3): 497–537.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Bian, Y., & Opper, S. 2018. More or less guanxi: Trust is 80% network, 10% individual differences. Social Networks, 54(July): 12–25.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Hogarth, R. M., & Michaud, C. 2000. The social capital of French and American managers. Organization Science, 11(2): 123–147.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M., & Tasselli, S. 2013. Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on network advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64: 537–547.Google Scholar
Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Huang, S. 2013. Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1): 167–207.Google Scholar
Chen, C.-j. J. 2014. Job search chains and embedded resources: A comparative analysis among Taiwan, China, and the U.S. In Lin, N., Fu, Y.-c., & Chen, C.-j. J. (Eds.), Social capital and its institutional contingency: A study of the United States, China, and Taiwan: 169–196. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1964. Introduction to mathematical sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(S): S95–S120.Google Scholar
David, T., & Westerhuis, G. 2014. The power of corporate networks: A comparative and historical perspective. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
DiTomaso, N., & Bian, Y. 2018. The structure of labor markets in the US and China: Social capital and guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 41(1): 5–36.Google Scholar
Ellickson, R. C. 1991. Order without law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Farh, J.-L. L., Tsui, A. S., Xin, K., & Cheng, B.-S. 1998. The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9(4): 471–488.Google Scholar
Faust, K., & Skvoretz, J. 2002. Comparing networks across space and time, size, and species. Sociological Methodology, 32(1): 267–299.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. 1950. Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., & Ruan, D. 1997. An international comparative study of interpersonal behavior and role relationships. L'Année Sociologique, 47(1): 89–115.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997) 2007. Current issues in comparative macrosociology. In Goldthrope, J. H. (Ed.), On sociology, Vol. 1: Critique and program: 39–60. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6): 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985. Economic action, social structure, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3): 481–510.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1992. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. In Nohria, N. & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: 29–56. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Greif, A. 1989. Reputation and coalitions in medieval trade: Evidence on the Maghribi traders. Journal of Economic History, 49(4): 857–882.Google Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2018. Show me the data! Improving evidence presentation for publication. Management and Organization Review, 14(2): 423–432.Google Scholar
Guthrie, D., Okhmatovskiy, I., Schoenman, R., & Xiao, Z. 2012. Ownership networks and new institutional forms in the transition from communism to capitalism. In Kogut, B. (Ed.), The small worlds of corporate governance: 117–149. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Healy, K., & Moody, J. 2014. Data visualization in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 40: 105–128.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W., & Leinhardt, S. 1970. A method for detecting structure in sociometric data. American Journal of Sociology, 76(3): 492–513.Google Scholar
Holm, H. J., Opper, S., & Nee, V. 2013. Entrepreneurs under uncertainty: An economic experiment in China. Management Science, 59(7): 1671–1687.Google Scholar
Keys, A. 1957. Diet and the epidemiology of coronary heart disease. Journal of the American Medical Association, 164(17): 1912–1919.Google Scholar
Kitayama, S., Park, J., Boylan, J. M., Miyamoto, Y., Levine, C. S., Markus, H. R., Karasawa, M., Coe, C. L., Kawakami, N., Love, G. D., & Ryff, C. D. 2015. Expression of anger and ill health in two cultures: An examination of inflammation and cardiovascular risk. Psychological Science, 26(2): 211–220.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. 2012. The small worlds of corporate governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Walker, G. 2001. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3): 317–335.Google Scholar
Lee, R. P. L., Ruan, D., & Lai, G. 2005. Social support and support networks in Beijing and Hong Kong. Social Networks, 27(3): 249–274.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2009. Never the twain shall meet? Integrating Chinese and Western management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 121–129.Google Scholar
Levine, S. S. 2018. Show us your data: Connect the dots, improve science. Management and Organization Review, 14(2): 433–437.Google Scholar
Levi Martin, J. 2017. Thinking through methods: A social science primer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lin, N. 2001. Guanxi: A conceptual analysis. In So, A., Lin, N., & Poston, D. (Eds.), The Chinese triangle of mainland, Taiwan, and Hong Kong: 153–166. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Ensel, W. M., & Vaughn, J. C. 1981. Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4): 393–405.Google Scholar
Lin, N., & Erikson, B. 2008. Social capital: An international research program. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Fu, Y.-c., & Chen, C.-j. J. 2014. Social capital and its institutional constituency: A study of the United States, China, and Taiwan. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, S. Y. 1970. Social stress and coronary heart disease in Japan: A hypothesis. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 48(1): 9–36.Google Scholar
Merluzzi, J. 2013. Social capital in Asia: Investigating returns to brokerage in collectivistic national cultures. Social Science Research, 42(3): 882–892.Google Scholar
Nee, V., & Opper, S. 2012. Capitalism from below: Markets and institutional change in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opper, S., Nee, V., & Holm, H. J. 2017. Risk aversion and guanxi activities: A behavioral analysis of CEOs in China. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4): 1504–1530.Google Scholar
Peng, M., Lebedev, S., Vlas, C. O., Wang, J. C., & Shay, J. S. 2019. The growth of the firm in (and out of) emerging economies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 36: In Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A., & Teune, H. 1970. The logic of comparative social inquiry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. C. 1987. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rider, C. I. 2009. Constraints on the control benefits of brokerage: A study of placement agents in U.S. venture capital fundraising. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(4): 575–601.Google Scholar
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. 2007. An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2): 173–191.Google Scholar
Ruan, D. 1998. The content of the General Social Survey discussion networks: An exploration of General Social Survey discussion name generator in a Chinese context. Social Networks, 20(3): 247–264.Google Scholar
Ruan, D., Zhou, L., Blau, P. M., & Walder, A. G. 1990. A preliminary analysis of the social networks of residents in Tianjin with a comparison to social networks in America. Social Sciences in China, 3(1): 68–89.Google Scholar
Schwab, A. 2018. Investigating and communicating the uncertainty of effects: The power of graphs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 42(6): 823–834.Google Scholar
Son, J. 2013. Social capital and institutional constraints: A comparative analysis of China, Taiwan, and the U.S. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorenson, O. 2017. Entrepreneurs and social capital in China. Management and Organization Review, 13(2): 275–280.Google Scholar
Ueshima, H., Sekikawa, A., Miura, K., Turin, T. C., Takashiam, N., Kita, Y. et al. 2008. Cardiovascular disease and risk factors in Asia: A selected review. Circulation, 118: 2702–2709.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 35–67.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. 2005. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2): 447–504.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. 1998. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684): 440–442Google Scholar
Whetten, D. A. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Xiao, Z., & Tsui, A. S. 2007. When brokers may not work: The cultural contingency of social capital in Chinese high-tech firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1): 1–31.Google Scholar
Zhao, C., & Burt, R. S. 2018. A note on business survival and social network. Management and Organization Review, 14(2): 377–394.Google Scholar