Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:09:32.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Community attitudes toward individuals with traumatic brain injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2010

T. McLELLAN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
A. BISHOP
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
A. McKINLAY*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Audrey McKinlay, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand. E-mail: audrey.mckinlay@canterbury.ac.nz

Abstract

Explicit and implicit attitudes toward people who have sustained traumatic brain injury (TBI) were investigated to determine if negative attitudes exist and if the terminology used (brain vs. head injury) exacerbated predicted negativity. Participants (n = 103) rated Tony (brain/head injury) and Peter (limb-injury) on 10 characteristics using a 7-point scale. Familiarity with brain injury was also measured. Implicit Association Tests (IAT) assessed potential negative bias. Tony (M = 36.84) was judged more negatively than Peter (M = 31.69). The term “brain” versus “head” injury resulted in more negative evaluations (Ms = 38.72 vs. 34.78). Participants familiar with TBI were more positive toward Tony than those unfamiliar (Ms = 34.98 vs. 39.80). Only those unfamiliar with TBI demonstrated implicit negative bias. Negative attitudes toward TBI are expressed explicitly with individuals openly endorsing less desirable characteristics. When people have more knowledge about or experience with brain injury, they are less likely to endorse negative stereotypes. (JINS, 2010, 16, 705–710.)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angermeyer, M.C., Matschinger, H., & Corrigan, P.W. (2004). Familiarity with mental illness and social distance from people with schizophrenia and major depression: Testing a model using data from a representative population survey. Schizophrenia Research, 69, 175182.Google Scholar
Babinkian, T., & Asarnow, R.F. (2009). Neurocognitive outcomes and recovery after pediatric TBI: Meta-analytic review of the literature. Neuropsychology, 23, 283296.Google Scholar
Bessenoff, G.R., & Sherman, J.W. (2000). Automatic and controlled components of prejudice toward fat people: Evaluation versus stereotype activation. Social Cognition, 18, 329353.Google Scholar
Corrigan, P.W., Edwards, A.B., Green, A., Diwan, S.L., & Penn, D.L. (2001). Prejudice, social distance, and familiarity with mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 27, 219225.Google Scholar
Fogel, J., Fauerbach, J.A., Ziegelstein, R.C., & Bush, D.E. (2004). Quality of life in physical health domains predicts adherence among myocardial infarction patients even after adjusting for depressive symptoms. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 56, 7582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 14641480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197216.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E.L., & Banaji, M.R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1741.Google Scholar
Hessen, E., Nestvold, K., & Anderson, V. (2007). Neuropsychological function 23 years after mild traumatic brain injury: A comparison of outcome after paediatric and adult head injuries. Brain Injury, 21, 963979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hux, K., Schram, C.D., & Goeken, T. (2006). Misconceptions about brain injury: A survey replication study. Brain Injury, 20, 547553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linden, M.A., & Crothers, I.R. (2006). Violent, caring, unpredictable: Public views on survivors of brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 763770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Link, B.G., & Phelan, J.C. (2006). Stigma and its public health implications. Lancet, 367, 528529.Google Scholar
Maas, A.I.R., Stocchetti, N., & Bullock, R. (2008). Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults. The Lancet, 7, 728737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinlay, A., Bishop, A., & McLellan, T. (under review). The changing terminology for brain injury: Do people in the community understand?Google Scholar
McKinlay, A., Dalrymple-Alford, J.C., Horwood, L.J., & Fergusson, D.M. (2002). Long term psychosocial outcomes after mild head injury in early childhood. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 73, 281288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKinlay, A., Grace, R.C., Horwood, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., & MacFarlane, M.R. (2009). Adolescent psychiatric symptoms following preschool childhood mild traumatic brain injury: Evidence from a birth cohort Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 24, 221227.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A., Grace, R.C., Horwood, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., Ridder, E.M., & MacFarlane, M.R. (2008). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury among children, adolescents and young adults: Prospective evidence from a birth cohort. Brain Injury, 22, 175181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resch, J.A., Villarreal, V., Johnson, C.L., Elliott, T.R., & Kwok, O. (2009). Trajectories of life satisfaction in the first 5 years following traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 52, 5159.Google Scholar
Rydell, R.J., McConnell, A.R., Strain, L.M., Claypool, H.M., & Hugenberg, K. (2007). Implicit and explicit attitudes respond differently to increasing amounts of counterattitudinal information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 867878.Google Scholar
Teachman, B.A., Wilson, J.G., & Komarovskaya, I. (2006). Implicit and explicit stigma of mental illness in diagnosed and healthy samples. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 7595.Google Scholar
Wolkenstein, L., & Meyer, T.D. (2009). What factors influence attitudes towards people with current depression and current mania? International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 55, 124140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed