Article contents
Biological Consequences of Segregation and Economic Deprivation: A Post-Slavery Population from Southwest Arkansas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 March 2009
Extract
Analysis of 80 skeletons from Cedar Grove, Arkansas, permits comparison of the skeletal data with historic accounts and interpretations of textual data. The high frequencies of skeletal lesions indicating dietary deficiencies and infectious disease demonstrates that this was a highly stressed population and that Cedar Grove participated in the historically documented nationwide decline of Afro-American health. The evidence is overwhelming that congenital syphilis was a major contributor to high infant mortality and population decline.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Economic History Association 1989
References
1 For example, see Ransom, Roger L. and Sutch, Richard, One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation (Cambridge, 1977);Google ScholarHiggs, Robert, Competition and Coercion: Blacks in the American Economy, 1865–1914 (Cambridge, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2 Farley, Reynolds, Growth of the Black Population: A Study of Demographic Trends (Chicago, 1970), p. 3;Google ScholarHiggs, Competition and Coercion, pp. 15–16.Google Scholar
3 For examples. see Rose, Jerome C. and Rathbun, Ted A., eds., “Afro-American Biohistory Symposium,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology 74 (10 1987), pp. 177–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 The osteological data collection procedures are described in detail in Rose, Jerome C., Gone to a Better Land: A Biohistory of a Rural Black Cemetery in the Post-Reconstruction South (Fayetteville, 1985), pp. 26–38.Google Scholar
5 Fancy, Growth of the Black Population, p. 3; Higgs, Competition and Coercion. p. 17.Google Scholar
6 Farley, Growth of the Black Population, p. 3.Google Scholar
7 Holmes, Samuel J., The Negro's Struggle for Survival: A Study in Human Ecology (Berkeley, 1937), p. 40;Google ScholarKiple, Kenneth F. and King, Virginia H., Another Dimension to the Black Diaspora: Diet, Disease and Racism, (Cambridge, 1981), p. 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8 Farley, Growth of the Black Population, pp. 209–12.Google Scholar
9 Kiple and King, Another Dimension, p. 188.Google Scholar
10 Farley, Growth of the Black Population, p. 212.Google Scholar
11 Ibid., p. 209.
12 Donald, Henderson H., The Negro Freedman: Conditions of the American Negro in the Early Years after Emancipation (New York, 1952), p. 162.Google Scholar
13 Farley, Growth of the Black Population, p. 70.Google Scholar
14 Kiple and King, Another Dimension, p. 188; Holmes, The Negro's Struggle, p. 76.Google Scholar
15 Martin, Debra L., Magennis, Ann L., and Rose, Jerome C., “Cortical Bone Maintenance in an Historic Afro-American Cemetery Sample From Cedar Grove, Arkansas,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 74 (10 1987), pp. 261–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Rose, Jerome C. and Hartnady, Philip, “Interpretation of Infectious Skeletal Lesions from an Historic Afro-American Cemetery,” a paper presented at the International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences, Zagreb, Yugoslavia (1988).Google Scholar
17 Kelley, Marc A. and Micozzi, Marc S., “Rib Lesions in Chronic Pulmonary Tuberculosis,” American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 65 (12 1984), p. 383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Farley, Growth of the Black Population, pp. 8–13, 222–26; Higgs, Competition and Coercion, p. 20.Google Scholar
19 Rose and Hartnady, “Infectious Skeletal Lesions.”Google Scholar
20 Donald, The Negro Freedman, p. 47; Higgs, Competition and Coercion, p. 105; Kiple and King, Another Dimension, p. 189; Ransom and Sutch, One Kind of Freedom, pp. 151–56.Google Scholar
21 Ransom and Sutch, One Kind of Freedom, p. 151.Google Scholar
22 Rose, Gone to a Better Land, p. 12.Google Scholar
23 Higgs, Competition and Coercion, pp. 37–93; Ransom and Sutch, One Kind of Freedom, pp. 56–199.Google Scholar
24 Graves, John W., “The Arkansas Negro and Segregation 1890–1903” (M.A. thesis. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1967), p. 30.Google Scholar
25 Sylva, Michael F., “Black Populations in Arkansas” (MA. thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1981), p. 52.Google Scholar
26 Graves, “The Arkansas Negro,” pp. 61–94.Google Scholar
27 Evidence for dietary adequacy and nutritional deficiencies observed on the skeleton reflect the actual nutrients delivered to the tissues of the body and not necessarily the nutritional value of the foods consumed. Both absorption of nutrients by the digestive organs and availability for absorption are influenced by the individual's parasite load and active diseases. See Scrimshaw, Nevin S., Taylor, Carl E., and Gordon, John E., Interactions of Nutrition and Infection (Geneva, 1968), for a more detailed explanation of these phenomena. Reconstruction of the influence of pathogens and parasites requires analysis of both the foods available and the nutritional adequacy of the diet obtained from the skeleton. Historic dietary records are not available for Cedar Grove, but biochemical studies of the bone and hair samples for dietary reconstruction are currently under way.Google ScholarPubMed
28 Kiple, Kenneth F. and Kiple, Virginia H., “Slave Child Mortality: Some Nutritional Answers to a Perennial Puzzle,” Journal of Social History, 10 (Spring 1977), pp. 284–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29 Ibid., p. 290.
30 Fogel, Robert W. and Engerman, Stanley L., Time on the Cross: The Economics of American Negro Slavery (Boston, 1974);Google ScholarSutch, Richard, “The Care and Feeding of Slaves,” in David, Paul A. et al. , eds., Reckoning With Slavery (New York, 1976), pp. 231–301.Google Scholar
31 Steckel, Richard H., “A Peculiar Population: The Nutrition, Health, and Mortality of American Slaves from Childhood to Maturity,” this Journal, 46 (09 1986), pp. 721–41.Google Scholar
32 Scrimshaw, Taylor, and Gordon, Interactions of Nutrition and Infection, pp. 216–60.Google Scholar
33 Martin, Magennis, and Rose, “Cortical Bone Maintenance,” pp. 255–64.Google Scholar
34 Steckel, “A Peculiar Population,” p. 739.Google Scholar
35 Ransom and Sutch, One Kind of Freedom, pp. 232–36.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by