Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:34:28.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Routine outcome monitoring in clinical practice: service and non-service costs of psychiatric patients attending a Community Mental Health Centre in Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

Mauro Percudani*
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health, Hospital of Legnano, Via Candiani 2, 20025 Legnano, Milan, Italy
Corrado Barbui
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry, Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
Jennifer Beecham
Affiliation:
Centre of the Economics of Mental Health, Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
Martin Knapp
Affiliation:
Centre of the Economics of Mental Health, Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK
*
*Corresponding author. Email address: m.percudani@tin.it
Get access

Abstract

Objective.

– This study estimated service and non-service costs in a random sample of patients attending a community psychiatric mental health centre in Italy.

Methods

– A randomly selected sample of patients identified during 1 week of routine clinical activity was enrolled. Information was collected using the Italian-language checklist Questionario Economico per l’attività clinica dei Servizi Psichiatrici (QESP). Costs were classified in two categories: service costs (from the provision of services) and non-service costs (loss of productivity and informal care).

Results.

– One hundred and twenty patients were included. Patients suffering from schizophrenia and related disorders (n = 50) had a mean age of 44.5 years (S.D. 12.9), and patients with other diagnoses (n = 70) had a mean age of 44.9 years (S.D. 14.8). More patients in the schizophrenia group were single, living alone, had a low educational level and a higher unemployment rate. In patients suffering from schizophrenia, the monthly service cost per patient was nearly double that for patients with other diagnoses. Non-service costs associated with patients’ lack of job opportunities were more than three times higher for patients with schizophrenia. Non-service costs associated with patients’ and care-givers’ time off work were similar in the two groups. In the multivariate analysis, being unemployed was associated with higher service costs. Younger age, length of illness and diagnosis of schizophrenia were determinants of higher non-service costs. The latter three independent variables were also associated with overall (service and non-service) costs.

Conclusion.

– The present study estimated service and non-service costs under routine circumstances to provide information on costs that community psychiatric services, patients and care-givers sustain when dealing with psychiatric problems.

Type
Original article
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amaddeo, FBeecham, JBonizzato, PFenyo, ATansella, M.The use of a case register to evaluate the costs of psychiatric care. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1997;95:189–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecham, JKKnapp, MRJ. Costing psychiatric services. In: Thorni-croft, G, editor. Measuring mental health needs. London: Gaskell; 2001.Google Scholar
Black, N.High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers. Lancet 1999;353:1205–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Cavallo, MCFattore, G.The economic and social burden of Alzheimer disease on families in the Lombardy region of Italy. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 1999;11:184–90.Google Scholar
Drummond, MFO’Brien, BJStoddart, GLTorrance, GW.Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Efron, BTibshirani, R.Bootstrap methods of standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci 1986;1:54–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fattore, GPercudani, MPugnoli, CContini, A.Mental health care in Italy: organisational structure, routine clinical activity and costs of a community psychiatric service in Lombardy region. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2000;46:250–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garattini, LRossi, CTediosi, FCornaggia, CCovelli, GBarbui, C, et al., on behalf of the Gruppo di Studio Score. Direct costs of schizophrenia in Italian community psychiatric services. Pharmaco-economics 2001;19:1217–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, MRSiegel, JERussell, LBWeinstein, MC.Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.Google ScholarPubMed
Grassi, ABruni, RPileggi, FChiappelli, MBoldrini, MFranceschi, E.Analisi e valutazione comparative dei costi dei trattamenti terapeutico-riabilitativi delle psicosi schizofreniche, delle psicosi affettive, della paranoia e dei disturbi nevrotici [Analysis and comparative evaluations of the costs of supports and treatments of schizophrenia, affective psychosis, paranoia and neurosis]. Epidemiol Psy-chiatr Soc 2001;10:115–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, PStiglin, LEFinkelstein, SBerndt, E.The economic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry 1993;54:405–18.Google ScholarPubMed
Kind, PSorenson, J.The cost of depression. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 1993;7:191–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, M.Costs of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1997;71:509–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, MAlmond, SPercudani, M.Costs of schizophrenia: a review. In: Maj, MSartorius, N, editors. WPA series evidence and experience in psychiatry, 2. Wiley; 1999. p. 407–54 Schizophrenia.Google Scholar
Knapp, MChisholm, DLeese, MAmaddeo, FTansella, MSchene, A, et al. Comparing patterns and costs of schizophrenia care in five European countries: The EPSILON study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2002;105:42–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, LFadden, GMadianos, MCaldas de Almeida, JMHeld, TGuarneri, M, et al. Burden on the families of patients with schizophrenia: results of the BIOMED I study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1998;33:405–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magliano, LMalangone, CGuarneri, MMarasco, CFiorillo, AMaj, M.La situazione delle famiglie dei pazienti con schizofrenia in Italia: carico familiare, risposte dei SSM, sostegno sociale [The condition of the families of patients with schizophrenia in Italy: burden, social network and professional support]. Epidemiol Psychiatr Soc 2001;10:96–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, I.Overcoming obstacles to routine outcome measurement. The nuts and bolts of implementing clinical audit. Br J Psychiatry 1998; 173:281–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrone, PThornicroft, GParkman, SNathaniel-James, DOjurongbe, W.Predictors of mental health service costs for representative cases of psychosis in south London. Psychol Med 1998;28:159–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Percudani, MBeecham, JKnapp, M.Valutare i costi nell’attività clinica di routine dei servizi psichiatrici. Sviluppo ed applicazione del QESP. [Evaluating costs in routine clinical practice of psychiatric services. Development and use of QESP]. Riv Sper Freniatr 2001;125: 191–212.Google Scholar
Percudani, MBelloni, GContini, ABarbui, C.Monitoring community psychiatric services in Italy: differences between patients who leave care and those who stay in treatment. Br J Psychiatry 2002;180:254–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Rice, DPMiller, LS.Health economics and cost implications of anxiety and other mental disorder in the United States. Br J Psychiatry 1998;173(Suppl 34):4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoudemire, AFrank, RHedemark, NKamlet, MBlazer, D.The economic burden of depression. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 1986;8:387–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarricone, RGerzeli, SMontanelli, RFrattura, LPercudani, MRacagni, G.Direct and indirect costs of schizophrenia in community psychiatric services in Italy. The GISIES study. Health Policy 2000;51:1–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.