Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T07:36:07.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Converse of the Dominated Ergodic Theorem in Hurewicz Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

László I. Szabó
László I. Szabó*
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The converse of the dominated ergodic theorem in infinite measure spaces is extended to non-singular transformations, i.e. transformations that only preserve the measure of null sets. An inverse weak maximal inequality is given and then applied to obtain related results in Orlicz spaces.

Keywords

28D9947A35
Type
Research Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , 01 September 1991 , pp. 405 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 1991

References

1. Akcoglu, M. A. and Sucheston, L., On uniform monotonicity of norms and ergodic theorems in function spaces, Supplemento ai Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo 8 (1985), 325–335.Google Scholar
2. Derriennic, Y., On The Integrability of The Supremum of Ergodic Ratios, Ann. Prob. 1 (1973), 338–340.Google Scholar
3. A, G. Edgar and Sucheston, L., On Maximal Inequalities in Orlicz spaces, Contemporary Mathematics 94 (1989), 113–129.Google Scholar
4. Fava, N. A., Weak inequalities for product operators, Studia Math. 42 (1972), 271–288.Google Scholar
5. Frangos, N. and Sucheston, L., On multiparameter ergodic and martingale theorems in infinite measure spaces, Probab. Th. Rel. Fields 71 (1986), 477–490.Google Scholar
6. Hurewicz, W., Ergodic Theorem without Invariant Measure, Ann. Math. 45 (1944), 192–206.Google Scholar
7. Krengel, U., Ergodic Theorems. De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics 6(1985).Google Scholar
8. Ornstein, D. S., A remark on the Birkhoff ergodic theorem, Illinois J. Math 15 (1971), 77–79.Google Scholar
9. Stein, E. M., Note on the class LlogL, Studia Math 32 (1969), 305–310.Google Scholar
10. Wiener, Norbert, The ergodic theorem, Duke Math. J. 5 (1939), 1–18.Google Scholar