Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dvmhs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-15T08:05:32.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

HOW TO NAME A TRIREME

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 September 2023

Mills McArthur
Mills McArthur*
Affiliation:
Southern Adventist University
*
millsmcarthur@southern.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The names of Athenian warships are a valuable source for cultural history, but scholars have long laboured without a sense of how these names were chosen. In a recent article, the present author has suggested that naval architects (master craftsmen elected by the Athenian Assembly) were responsible for naming each vessel they built. This explanation applies to the great majority of Athenian warship names known to us, but exceptions to the rule remain. Naval architects cannot have named vessels they did not build, and we know of several foreign-built ships (e.g., captured or donated ships) in the Athenian fleet. Vessels with the special status of ‘sacred triremes’ must also have followed their own unique naming procedure. Such exceptional cases are the subject of this paper.

Τα ονόματα των αθηναϊκών πολεμικών πλοίων είναι μια πολύτιμη πηγή για την πολιτισμική ιστορία, αλλά οι ερευνητές έχουν κοπιάσει εδώ και πολύ καιρό χωρίς καμία αίσθηση του πως επιλέγονταν αυτά τα ονόματα. Σε ένα πρόσφατο άρθρο του, ο συγγραφέας του παρόντος έχει προτείνει ότι οι ναυπηγοί (αρχιτεχνίτες που εκλέγονταν από την αθηναϊκή συνέλευση) ήταν υπεύθυνοι για την ονοματοδοσία κάθε πλοίου που κατασκεύαζαν. Αυτή η εξήγηση ισχύει για τη μεγαλύτερη πλειονότητα των ονομάτων των αθηναϊκών πολεμικών πλοίων που μας είναι γνωστά, αλλά παραμένουν ορισμένες εξαιρέσεις στον κανόνα. Οι ναυπηγοί δεν θα μπορούσαν να ονοματοδοτούν τα πλοία που δεν είχαν κατασκευάσει, και γνωρίζουμε για αρκετά πλοία ξένης κατασκευής (πχ. αιχμαλωτισθέντα ή δωρηθέντα πλοία) στον αθηναϊκό στόλο. Σκάφη με το ειδικό καθεστώς της «ιεράς τριήρους» πρέπει να ακολουθούσαν τη δική τους μοναδική διαδικασία ονοματοδοσίας. Τέτοιες ειδικές περιπτώσεις είναι το θέμα αυτού του άρθρου.

Μετάφραση: Στ. Ιερεμίας

Type
Articles
Information
Annual of the British School at Athens , First View , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Council, British School at Athens

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ashton, N.G. 1977. ‘The naumachia near Amorgos in 322 bc’, BSA 72, 1–11.Google Scholar
Ashton, N.G. 1983. ‘The Lamian War – a false start?’, Antichthon 17, 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badian, E. 1961. ‘Harpalus’, JHS 81, 16–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, D. 1969. ‘The Athenian naval and allied naval contributions in the Pentecontaetia’, GRBS 10.3, 179–216.Google Scholar
Blackwell, C.W. 1999. In the Absence of Alexander: Harpalus and the Failure of Macedonian Authority (New York).Google Scholar
Böckh, A. 1840. Urkunden über das Seewesen des Attischen Staates (Berlin).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bubelis, W. 2010. ‘The sacred triremes and their tamiai at Athens’, Historia 59.4, 385–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burford, A. 1972. Craftsmen in Greek and Roman Society (Aspects of Greek and Roman Life; Ithaca, NY).Google Scholar
Casson, L. 1995a. ‘A trireme for hire (Is. 11.48)’, CQ 45.1, 241–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casson, L. 1995b. Ships and Seamanship in the Ancient World (Baltimore, MD and London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caven, B. 1990. Dionysius I: War-lord of Sicily (New Haven, CT and London).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, M. 1990. ‘The date of IG II2 1604’, BSA 85, 47–67.Google Scholar
Clark, M. 1993. ‘The economy of the Athenian navy in the fourth century bc’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Oxford).Google Scholar
Clark, M. 1995. “καὶ τὸ μὴ τείνειν ἄγαν”, ZPE 108, 281–4.Google Scholar
Cole, P.J. 1981. ‘The catapult bolts of IG 22 1422’, Phoenix 35.3, 216–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkelberg, M. 2014. ‘Boreas and Oreithyia: a case-study in multichannel transmission of myth’, in Scodel, R. (ed.), Between Orality and Literacy: Communication and Adaptation in Antiquity (Mnemosyne Supp. 367; Leiden and Boston, MA), 87–100.Google Scholar
Gabrielsen, V. 1992. ‘The date of IG II2 1604 again’, ZPE 93, 69–74.Google Scholar
Gabrielsen, V. 1994. Financing the Athenian Fleet: Public Taxation and Social Relations (Baltimore, MD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, R. 2001. The Piraeus: From the Fifth to the First Century bc, 2nd edn (London).Google Scholar
Green, P. 1990. Alexander to Actium: The Historical Evolution of the Hellenistic Age (Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA).Google Scholar
Hansen, M.H. 1991. ‘Response to Douglas MacDowell’, in Gagarin, M. (ed.), Symposion 1990: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Pacific Grove, California, 24.–26. September 1990) (Cologne), 199–201.Google Scholar
Harding, P. 2006. Didymos, on Demosthenes: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary (Clarendon Ancient History Series; Oxford).Google Scholar
Harrison, A.R.W. 1968. The Law of Athens: The Family and Property (Oxford).Google Scholar
Harrison, A.R.W. 1971. The Law of Athens: Procedure (Oxford).Google Scholar
Jane, F.T. 1912. The British Battle Fleet: Its Inception and Growth throughout the Centuries (London).Google Scholar
Jones, M. 2000. ‘The names given to ships in fourteenth- and fifteenth-century England’, Nomina 23, 23–36.Google Scholar
Jones, M. 2016. ‘Ship names’, in Hough, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (Oxford), 655–60.Google Scholar
Jordan, B. 1975. The Athenian Navy in the Classical Period: A Study of Athenian Naval Administration and Military Organization in the Fifth and Fourth Centuries bc (University of California Publications: Classical Studies 13; Berkeley, CA).Google Scholar
Kennedy, D.H. 1974. Ship Names: Origins and Usages during 45 Centuries (Charlottesville, VA).Google Scholar
Laing, D.R. Jr. 1968. ‘A reconstruction of IG, II2, 1628’, Hesperia 37.2, 244–54.Google Scholar
Lambert, S.D. 1997. ‘The Attic Genos Salaminioi and the island of Salamis’, ZPE 119, 85–106.Google Scholar
Lambert, S.D. 2010. ‘A polis and its priests: Athenian priesthoods before and after Pericles’ citizenship law’, Historia 59.2, 143–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McArthur, M. 2021. ‘Athenian shipbuilders’, Hesperia 90.3, 479–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDowell, D.M. 1991. ‘The Athenian procedure of phasis’, in Gagarin, M. (ed.), Symposion 1990: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Pacific Grove, California, 24.–26. September 1990) (Cologne), 187–98.Google Scholar
Mason, H.B. 1908. Encyclopædia of Ships and Shipping (London).Google Scholar
Nyström, S. 2016. ‘Names and meaning’, in Hough, C. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Names and Naming (Oxford), 39–51.Google Scholar
Parker, R. 2010. ‘New problems in Athenian religion: the “sacred law” from Aixone’, in Dijkstra, J., Kroesen, J. and Kuiper, Y. (eds), Myths, Martyrs, and Modernity: Studies in the History of Religions in Honour of Jan N. Bremmer (Numen Book Series 127; Leiden and Boston, MA), 193–206.Google Scholar
Rhodes, P.J. 1993. A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia, rev. edn (Oxford).Google Scholar
Schmidt, K. 1931. ‘Die Namen der attischen Kriegsschiffe’ (unpublished PhD thesis, University of Leipzig).Google Scholar
Shear, J.L. 1995. ‘Fragments of naval inventories from the Athenian agora’, Hesperia 64.2, 179–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstone, P.H. 1989. Warships of the Civil War Navies (Annapolis, MD).Google Scholar
Simonsen, K. 2009. ‘Demaenetus and the trireme’, Mouseion 9.3, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.C. 2011. Polis and Personification in Classical Athenian Art (Monumenta Graeca et Romana 19; Leiden and Boston, MA).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turfa, J.M. and Steinmayer, A.G. Jr. 1999. ‘The Syracusia as a giant cargo vessel’, IJNA 28.2, 105–25.Google Scholar
Wallace, R.W. 2003. ‘phainein in Athenian laws and legal procedures’, in Thür, G. and Nieto, F.J.F. (eds), Symposion 1999: Vorträge zur griechischen und hellenistischen Rechtsgeschichte (Pazo de Mariñán, La Coruña, 6.–9. September 1999) (Cologne), 167–81.Google Scholar
Worthington, I. 1986. ‘I.G. II2 1631, 1632 and Harpalus’ ships’, ZPE 65, 222–4.Google Scholar