Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:51:44.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rational Choice and the Dynamics of Collective Political Action: Evaluating Alternative Models with Panel Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Steven E. Finkel
Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Abstract

Causal inference in research testing rational choice models of unconventional political behavior has been hampered by the inability to use perceptions of the costs and benefits of participation at a given time to predict behavior that necessarily occurred in the past and by ambiguities associated with analyzing behavioral intentions instead of actual participation. Using panel data collected on a national sample in West Germany between 1987 and 1989, we show that variables from a “collective interest” model measured in 1987—individuals' dissatisfaction with the provision of collective goods, beliefs that group actions can be successful, and beliefs in the importance of their own participation—predict subsequent participation in collective protest activities. Variables corresponding to the private “selective incentives” associated with protest are found to be less relevant. Furthermore, we find that engaging in protest changes many of the perceptions that influence future participation. We discuss the implications for theories of political mobilization.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1998 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aldrich, John H. 1976. “Some Problems in Testing Two Rational Models of Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 20(11):713–33.Google Scholar
Barnes, Samuel H., and Kaase, Max, eds. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I., and Mortimore, G. W.. 1976. “Introduction.” In Rationality and the Social Sciences, ed. Benn, S. I. and Mortimore, G. W.. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Pp. 17.Google Scholar
Chong, Dennis. 1991. Collective Action and the Civil Rights Movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1985. “Rationality, Morality, and Collective Action.” Ethics 96(10):136–55.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1989. The Cement of Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1987. “The Effects of Participation on Political Efficacy and Political Support: Evidence from a West German Panel.” Journal of Politics 49(05):891913.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E. 1995. Causal Analysis with Panel Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Muller, Edward N., and Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1989. “Personal Influence, Collective Rationality, and Mass Political Action.” American Political Science Review 83(09):885903.Google Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., and Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1991. “Party Identification and Participation in Collective Political Action.” Journal of Politics 53(05):339–71.Google Scholar
Friedman, Debra, and McAdam, Doug. 1992. “Collective Identity and Activism: Networks, Choices and the Life of a Social Movement.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992. Pp. 156–73.Google Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1992. “The Social Psychology of Collective Action.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pp. 5376.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1997. “Mass Opposition to the Soviet Putsch of August 1991: Collective Action, Rational Choice, and Democratic Values in the Former Soviet Union.” American Political Science Review 91(09):671–84.Google Scholar
Granberg, Donald, and Holmberg, Soeren. 1988. The Political System Matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Green, Donald P., and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, van Deth, Jan W., Barnes, Samuel H., Fuchs, Dieter, Heunks, Felix J., Inglehardt, Ronald, Kaase, Max, Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, and Thomasson, Jacques J. A.. 1990. Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies. Berlin and New York: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kessler, Ronald C., and Greenberg, David F.. 1981. Linear Panel Analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 1984. “Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory.” American Sociological Review 49(10):583600.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 1992. “The Social Construction of Protest and Multiorganizational Fields.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pp. 77103.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert, and Oegema, Dirk. 1987. “Potentials, Networks, Motivations and Barriers: Steps Toward Participation in Social Movements.” American Sociological Review 52(08):519–32.Google Scholar
Klosko, George. 1987. “Rebellious Collective Action Revisited.” American Political Science Review 81(06):557–61.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan E. 1995. “Attitudes, Opportunities and Incentives: A Field Essay on Political Participation.” Political Research Quarterly 48(03):181210.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark I. 1994. “What Makes Rational Peasants Revolutionary?World Politics 46(04):383418.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark I. 1995. The Rebel's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, Susanne. 1994. “Dynamics of Informational Cascades: The Monday Demonstrations in Leipzig, East Germany, 1989–91. World Politics 47(10):42101.Google Scholar
Marsh, Alan. 1977. Protest and Political Consciousness. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, and Paulsen, Ronnelle. 1993. “Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism.” American Journal of Sociology 99(11):640–67.Google Scholar
Morton, Rebecca B. 1991. “Groups in Rational Turnout Models.” American Journal of Political Science 35(08):758–76.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N. 1979. Aggressive Political Participation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., Dietz, Henry A., and Finkel, Steven E.. 1991. “Discontent and the Expected Utility of Rebellion: The Case of Peru.” American Political Science Review 85(12):1261–82.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., and Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1986. “Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 80(06):471–89.Google Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony R. 1980. “Loosely-Structured Collective Conflict.” Research in Social Movements, Conflict and Change 3:4568.Google Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony R. 1994. “Rational Choice in Collective Protests.” Rationality and Society 6(06):79100.Google Scholar
Oegema, Dirk, and Klandermans, Bert. 1994. “Why Social Movement Sympathizers Don't Participate: Erosion and Non-Conversion of Support.” American Sociological Review 59(10):703–22.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1988. “Grievances and Social Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 53(12):853–64.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1989. The Rationality of Political Protest. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. N.d. “Does Anti-Regime Action under Communist Rule Affect Political Protest after the Fall? Results of a Panel Study.” Sociological Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, Finkel, Steven E., Muller, Edward N., Dietz, Henry A., Green, Jerrold, and Wolfsfeld, Gadi. 1995. “Ideological Commitment and Collective Political Action.” In The Politics of Social Protest: Comparative Perspectives on States and Social Movements, ed. Klandermans, Bert and Jenkins, J. Craig. Minneapolis: University of Minnesoata Press, Pp. 6395.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Ruehl, Wolfgang. 1990. “Repression, Micromobilization, and Political Protest.” Social Forces 69(12):521–47.Google Scholar
Pierce, Roy, and Converse, Philip E.. 1990. “Attitudinal Sources of Protest Behavior in France: Differences between Before and After Measurement.” Public Opinion Quarterly 54(Fall):295316.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Michael, and Paul, Shuva. 1992. “Resource Mobilization versus the Mobilization of People: Why Consensus Movements Cannot Be Instruments of Social Change.” In Frontiers in Social Movement Theory, ed. Morris, Aldon D. and Mueller, Carol McClurg. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pp. 205–23.Google Scholar
Silver, Brian D., Anderson, Barbara A., and Abramson, Paul R.. 1986. “Who Overreports Voting?American Political Science Review 80(06):613–24.Google Scholar
Simon, Herbert. 1985. “Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science.” American Political Science Review 79(06):293304.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., and Oliver, Pamela E.. 1993. “Social Movements and Collective Behavior: Social Psychological Dimensions and Considerations.” In Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, ed. Cook, Karen, Fine, Gary, and House, James. New York: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Rochford, E. Burke Jr., Worden, Steven K., and Benford, Robert D.. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51(08):464–81.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1995. Power in Movement. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Uhlaner, Carole J. 1989. “Rational Turnout: The Neglected Role of Groups.” American Journal of Political Science 33(05):390422.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay L., and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, Edward J., and Warland, Rex H.. 1983. “Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident: Activists and Free Riders in the Three Mile Island Area.” American Sociological Review 48(12):764–81.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul. 1995. “Rational Choice and Political Participation: Evaluating the Debate.” Political Research Quarterly 48(03):211–34.Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, Seyd, Patrick, Richardson, Jeremy, and Bissell, Paul. 1994. “Explaining Party Activism: The Case of the British Conservative Party.” British Journal of Political Science 24(01):7994.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.