Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:24:38.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pollen Records of Guila Naquitz Cave

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

James Schoenwetter*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Arizona State University

Abstract

Pollen recovered from the sediments of Guila Naquitz Cave, Oaxaca, is compared with pollen representing modern ecological patterns in the Valley of Oaxaca. This allows the reconstruction of both vegetational and climatic patterns for the period of preceramic occupancy of the cave: roughly, 6000-8000 B.C. A generally cooler yet more xeric climate apparently prevailed, as had been suggested by faunal analyses at Coxcatlan Cave near Tehuacan, Puebla. However, the floral and faunal resources available near the cave today were available there at the time of occupation. Pollen representing a plant that is closely related to modern maize is recognizable from the pollen record. The distribution of this pollen among the samples, as well as the macrofossil remains associated with the pollen and the reconstructed ecological pattern, indicate that the maize-like plant was being cultivated.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barghoorn, E. S., Wolfe, M. K., and Clisby, K. H. 1954 Fossil maize pollen from the Valley of Mexico. Harvard University Botanical Museum Leaflets 16:229240.Google Scholar
Bartlett, A. S., Barghoorn, E. S., and Berger, R. 1968 Fossil maize from Panama. Science 165: 389390.Google Scholar
Erdtman, Gunnar 1952 Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy: Angiosperms. An introduction to palynology, Vol. I: Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1967 The vertebrate fauna and hunting patterns. In Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 1: environment and subsistence, edited by Byers, D., pp. 132177. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. 1968 Archaeological systems theory and early Mesoamerica. In Anthropological archaeology in the Americas, edited by Meggers, B. J., pp. 67-87. Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar
Flannery, Kent V. (Editor) 1970 Preliminary archaeological investigations in the Valley of Oaxaca, 1966-1969. A report to the National Science Foundation and the Instituto Nacional de Antropologia e Historia.Google Scholar
Galinat, Walton C. 1971 The origin of maize. Annual Review of Genetics 5:447478.Google Scholar
Gonzales Quintero, Lauro 1967 Flora polinica y tipos de vegetacion del Valle del Mexquital. Tesis profesional, Instituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biologicas. Mexico, D. F.Google Scholar
Irwin, Henry T., and Barghoom, E. S. 1962 Criteria in distinguishing the pollen of maize, teosinte, and Tripsacum. Pollen et Spores 4:352.Google Scholar
Irwin, Henry T., and Barghoom, E. S. 1965 Identification of the pollen of maize, teosinte, and Tripsacum by phase contrast microscopy. Harvard University Botanical Museum Leaflets 21:3757.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Edwin B. Jr., Liverman, James L., and Tucker, Henry 1960 Some problems concerning fossil and modern corn pollen. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 87:8594.Google Scholar
Kurtz, Edwin B. Jr., Tucker, Henry, and Liverman, James L. 1960 Reliability of identification of fossil pollen as corn. American Antiquity 25:605606.Google Scholar
Angeli, Wilhelm 1967a Introduction. In Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 1: environment and subsistence, edited by Byers, D., pp. 113. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Angeli, Wilhelm 1967b A summary of the subsistence. In Prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Vol. 1: environment and subsistence, edited by Byers, D., pp. 290310. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
MacNeish, Richard S., and Peterson, Frederick A. 1962 The Santa Marta Rockshelter, Ocozocoautla, Chiapas, Mexico. Papers of the New World Archaeological Foundation 15.Google Scholar
Manglesdorf, Paul C. 1958 Ancestor of corn. Science 128:13131320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Paul S., and Schoenwetter, J. 1960 Arizona's oldest cornfield. Science 132:3334.Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S., and Sharrock, F. W. 1964 Pollen analysis of prehistoric human feces; a new approach to ethnobotany. American Antiquity 30:168180.Google Scholar
Meyers, J. Thomas 1971 The origins of agriculture: an evaluation of three hypotheses. In Prehistoric Agriculture, edited by Streuver, S., pp. 101121. American Museum Sourcebook in Anthropology, Natural History Press, Garden City.Google Scholar
Mosimann, James E. 1965 Statistical methods for the pollen analyst: multinomial and negative multinomial techniques. In Handbook of Paleontological Techniques, edited by Kummel, B. and Raup, D.. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
Odum, Eugene P. 1959 Fundamentals of ecology. Saunders Co., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Palacios Chavez, Rodolfo 1967 Morfologia de los granos de polen de arboles del estado de Morelos. Tesis profesional, In- stituto Politecnico Nacional, Escuela Nacional del Ciencias Biologicas. Mexico, D. F.Google Scholar
Rowley, John R. 1960 The exine structure of “cereal” and “wild” type grass pollen. Grana Palynologica 2:915.Google Scholar
Snedecor, George W. 1956 Statistical methods applied to experiments in agriculture and biology, Fifth Edition. Iowa State College Press, Ames.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Matsuo, and Rowley, John R. 1964 Identification of modern and fossil maize pollen. Grana Palynologica 5:406412.Google Scholar
Whitaker, Thomas A., and Cutler, H. C. 1971 Prehistoric cucurbits from the Valley of Oaxaca. Economic Botany 25:123127.Google Scholar