Book contents
- Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums
- Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums
- Copyright page
- In Memoriam
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Programs and Initiatives
- 1 Evolving Approaches to Zoo-Based Conservation
- 2 Protecting an Underwater Rainforest
- 3 Headstarting as a Conservation Strategy for Threatened and Endangered Species
- 4 Strategic Gene Banking for Conservation
- 5 The Environmental Education Program at São Paulo Zoo (Brazil)
- 6 Conservation and Education through Dolphin Research and Eco-Tourism
- Part II Captive Care and Management
- Part III Saving Species
- Part IV Basic Research
- Conclusion
- Appendix
- Index
- References
3 - Headstarting as a Conservation Strategy for Threatened and Endangered Species
from Part I - Programs and Initiatives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 December 2018
Book contents
- Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums
- Scientific Foundations of Zoos and Aquariums
- Copyright page
- In Memoriam
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Programs and Initiatives
- 1 Evolving Approaches to Zoo-Based Conservation
- 2 Protecting an Underwater Rainforest
- 3 Headstarting as a Conservation Strategy for Threatened and Endangered Species
- 4 Strategic Gene Banking for Conservation
- 5 The Environmental Education Program at São Paulo Zoo (Brazil)
- 6 Conservation and Education through Dolphin Research and Eco-Tourism
- Part II Captive Care and Management
- Part III Saving Species
- Part IV Basic Research
- Conclusion
- Appendix
- Index
- References
Summary
Zoos can play an integral role in headstarting, a conservation strategy involving the rearing of animals in zoos from birth or hatching and throughout the time when they are susceptible to the mortalities young animals experience in nature. Once they pass that critical period, they are returned to nature to help sustain wild populations. WCS’s Bronx and Queens zoos are involved in several such programs. The Bronx Zoo was instrumental in identifying the parameters required to rear maleo chicks, an endangered Indonesian bird. WCS’s field program in Indonesia adopted these protocols and 12,772 chicks have been headstarted since 2001. The Queens and Roger Williams Park Zoos are part of a multiagency team headstarting New England cottontail rabbits (NECTs), a species with a declining population. To date, 191 NECTs have been reintroduced to sites in New England. The Bronx Zoo also works with Eastern hellbenders, the US’s largest amphibian. The zoo hatches hellbender eggs collected from Allegheny watershed streams and rears the young until they reach a size where they are too large for most aquatic predators. The zoo has successfully reared nearly 300 hellbenders for release.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Scientific Foundations of Zoos and AquariumsTheir Role in Conservation and Research, pp. 91 - 111Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Alberts, A. C. (2007). Behavioral considerations of headstarting as a conservation strategy for endangered Caribbean rock iguanas. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 102, 380–391.Google Scholar
Argeloo, M. (1994). The maleo Macrocephala maleo: New information on the distribution and status of Sulawesi’s endemic megapode. Bird Conservation International, 4, 383–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argeloo, M., & Dekker, R. W. R. J. (1996). Exploitation of megapode eggs in Indonesia: The role of traditional methods in the conservation of megapodes. Oryx, 30, 59–64.Google Scholar
Barbour, M. S., & Litvaitis, J. A. (1993). Niche dimensions of New England cottontails in relation to habitat patch size. Oecologia, 95, 321–327.Google Scholar
Bell, C., Parsons, J., Austin, T. J., Broderick, A. C., Ebanks-Petrie, G., & Godley, B. J. (2005). Some of them came home: The Cayman Turtle Farm headstarting project for the green turtle Chelonia mydas. Oryx, 39, 137–148.Google Scholar
Bertolero, A., Oro, D., & Besnard, A. (2007). Assessing the efficacy of reintroduction programmes by modelling adult survival: The example of Hermann’s tortoise. Animal Conservation, 10, 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdlife International (2000). Maleo. In Threatened Birds of the World (p. 124). Barcelona and Cambridge: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International.Google Scholar
BirdLife International (2016). Macrocephalon maleo. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22678576A92779438.en.Google Scholar
Bowkett, A. (2008). Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conservation Biology, 23, 773–776.Google Scholar
Browne, R., Wolfram, K., Garcia, G., Bagaturov, M., & Pereboom, Z. (2011). Zoo-based amphibian research and conservation breeding programs. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation, 5, 1–10.Google Scholar
Butchart, S. M., & Baker, B. C. (2000). Priority sites for conservation of maleos (Macrocephalon maleo) in central Sulawesi. Biological Conservation, 94, 79–91.Google Scholar
Champagnon, J., Elmberg, J., Guillemain, M., Gauthier-Clerc, M., & Lebreton, J. D. (2012). Conspecifics can be aliens too: A review of effects of restocking practices in vertebrates. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20, 231–241.Google Scholar
Collins, S. A., Sanders, F. J., & Jodice, P. G. R. (2016). Assessing conservation tools for an at-risk shorebird: Feasibility of headstarting for American Oystercatchers Haematopus palliatus. Bird Conservation International, 26, 451–465.Google Scholar
Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R., & Scheuerlein, A. (2011). An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science, 331, 1390–1391.Google Scholar
Cornejo, J., Iorizzo, M., & Clum, N. (2014). Artificial incubation of maleo Macrocephalon maleo eggs at the Bronx Zoo/Wildlife Conservation Society, New York. International Zoo Yearbook, 48, 39–47.Google Scholar
Crane, L. A., & Mathis, A. (2011). Predator-recognition training: A conservation strategy to increase post release survival of hellbenders in head-starting programs. Zoo Biology, 30, 611–622.Google Scholar
Crump, P., & Grow, S. (2007). Action plan for ex situ amphibian conservation in the AZA community. Retrieved from www.aza.org/amphibian-conservation.Google Scholar
Cunninghame, F., Switzer, R., Parks, B., Young, G., Carrión, A., Medranda, P., & Sevilla, C. (2015). Conserving the critically endangered mangrove finch: Head-starting to increase population size. In Galapagos Report 2013–2014. Puerto Ayora, Galapagos, Ecuador: GNPD, GCREG, CDF, and GC.Google Scholar
Dekker, R. W. (1988). Notes on ground temperatures at nesting sites of the maleo Macrocephalon maleo (Megapodiidae). Emu-Austral Ornithology, 88, 124–127.Google Scholar
Dekker, R. W. (1990). The distribution and status of nesting grounds of the maleo Macrocephalon maleo in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 51, 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., & Sargatal, J. (1994). Megapodiidae (Megapodes). In Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 2. New World Vultures to Guineafowl. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions.Google Scholar
Foster, R. L., McMillian, A. M., & Roblee, K. J. (2009). Population status of hellbender salamanders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) in the Allegheny River drainage of New York. Journal of Herpetology, 43, 579–588.Google Scholar
Gorog, A. J., Pamungkas, B., & Roberts, J. L. (2005). Nesting ground abandonment by the maleo (Macrocephalon maleo) in North Sulawesi: Identifying conservation priorities for Indonesia’s endemic megapode. Biological Conservation, 126, 548–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskell, A., Graham, T. E., Griffin, C. R., & Hestbeck, J. B. (1996). Size related survival of headstarted redbelly turtles (Pseudemys rubriventris) in Massachusetts. Journal of Herpetology, 30, 524–527.Google Scholar
Hunowu, I. (2017). Conservation of Sulawesi’s Mascot Bird – The Maleo. WCS Sulawesi Program Update. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.Google Scholar
Indrawan, M., Wahid, N., Argeloo, M., Mile-Doucet, S., Tasirin, J., Koh, L. P., … McGowan, P. J. (2012). All politics is local: The case of Macrocephalon maleo conservation on Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 21, 3735–3744.Google Scholar
Jones, D. N., Dekker, R. W., & Roselaar, S. C. (1995). Bird Families of the World: The Megapodes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, R. B., & Stanford, K. M. (2006). Headstarting as a management tool: A case study of the plains garter snake. Herpetologica, 62, 282–292.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. A., & Attum, O. (2009). Conservation strategies: Captive rearing, translocation, and repatriation. In Mullin, S. T. & Seigel, R. A. (Eds.), Snakes – Ecology and Conservation (pp. 201–220). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R., Didby, R. A., & Tomkovich, P. S. (2015). The spoon-billed sandpiper Calidris pygmaea head-starting programme in 2015. BirdingASIA, 24, 104–107.Google Scholar
Levitis, D. A., & Martinez, D. E. (2013). The two halves of U-shaped mortality. Frontiers in Genetics, 4, 31.Google Scholar
Litvaitis, J. A., Tash, J. P., Litvaitis, M. K., Marchand, M. N., Kovach, A. I., & Innes, R. (2006). A range-wide survey to determine the current distribution of New England cottontails. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 1190–1197.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. (1981). Methods for the conservation of maleo birds, Macrocephalon maleo on the island of Sulawesi Indonesia. Biological Conservation, 20, 183–193.Google Scholar
Madsen, T., & Shine, R. (2000). Silver spoons and snake body sizes: Prey availability early in life influences long-term growth rates of free-ranging pythons. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69, 952–958.Google Scholar
Mayasich, J., Grandmaison, D., & Philips, C. (2003). Eastern hellbender status assessment report. Retrieved from www.fws.gov/midwest/es/soc/amphibians/eahe-sa.pdf.Google Scholar
McMahon, T. A., Brannelly, L. A., Chatfield, M. W. H., Johnson, P. T. J., Joseph, M. B., McKenzie, V. J., … Rohr, J. R. (2013). B. dendrobatidis has non-amphibian hosts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 210–215.Google Scholar
Mitrus, S. (2005). Headstarting in European pond turtles (Emys orbicularis): Does it work? Amphibia–Reptilia, 26, 333–341.Google Scholar
Morafka, D. J., Berry, K. H., & Spangenberg, K. (1997). Predator-proof field enclosures for enhancing hatching success and survivorship of juvenile tortoises: a critical evaluation. In Proceedings: Conservation, Restoration, and Management of Tortoises and Turtles – An International Conference. New York: New York Turtle and Tortoise Society.Google Scholar
Paputungan, U., Wungow, D. J., & Wahyudi, L. (1998). Hatchability of maleo birds (Macrocephalon maleo) under non-active and active nesting sites at Tangkoko Nature Reserve, North Sulawesi (Indonesia). Presented at 2nd International Conference on Eastern Indonesia–Australian Vertebrate Fauna, Mataram (Indonesia).Google Scholar
Perez-Buitrago, N., Garcia, M. A., Sabat, A., Delgado, J., Alvarez, A., McMillan, O., & Funk, S. M. (2008). Do headstart programs work? Survival and body condition in headstarted Mona Island iguanas Cyclura cornuta stejnegeri. Endangered Species Research, 6, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pramuk, J., Titus, V. R., & Wagner, J. (2011). An effective method for transporting hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis). Herpetological Review, 42, 532–534.Google Scholar
Plummer, M. V., & Mills, N. E. (2000). Spatial ecology and survivorship of resident and translocated hognose snakes (Heterodon platirhinos). Journal of Herpetolology, 34, 5 65–575.Google Scholar
Probert, B. P., & Litvaitis, J. A. (1996). Behavioral interactions between invading and endemic lagomorphs: Implications for conserving a declining species. Biological Conservation, 76, 289–295.Google Scholar
Rittenhouse, C. D., Millspaugh, J. J., Hubbard, M. W., & Sheriff, S. L. (2007). Movements of translocated and resident three-toed box turtles. Journal of Herpetolology, 41, 115–121.Google Scholar
Roe, J. H., Frank, M. R., Gibson, S. E., Attum, O., & Kingsbury, B. A. (2010). No place like home: An experimental comparison of reintroduction strategies using snakes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 1253–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rusiyantono, Y., Tanari, M., & Mumu, M. I. (2011). Conservation of maleo bird (Macrocephalon maleo) through egg hatching modification and ex situ management. Biodiversitas, 12, 171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacerdote-Velat, A. B., Earnhardt, J. M., Mulkerin, D., Boehm, D., & Glowacki, G. (2014). Evaluation of headstarting and release techniques for population augmentation and reintroduction of the smooth green snake. Animal Conservation, 17, 65–73.Google Scholar
Shaver, D. J., & Wibbels, T. (2007). Head-starting the Kemp’s ridley sea turtle. In Plotkin, P. T. (Ed.), Biology and Conservation of Ridley Sea Turtles (pp. 297–324). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Spear, S. F., Groves, J. D., Williams, L. A., & Waits, L. P. (2015). Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in hellbender (Crytobranchus alleganiensis). Biological Conservation, 183, 38–45.Google Scholar
Starck, J. M., & Sutter, E. (2000). Patterns of growth and heterochrony in moundbuilders (Megapodiidae) and fowl (Phasianidae). Journal of Avian Biology, 31, 527–547.Google Scholar
Tuberville, T. D., Clark, E. E., Buhlmann, K. A., & Gibbons, J. W. (2005). Translocation as a conservation tool: Site fidelity and movement of repatriated gopher tortoises (Gopherus polyphemus). Animal Conservation, 8, 349–358.Google Scholar
Uno, A., Heinrich, G., & Menden, J. J. (1949). Het naturrmonument Panoea (N. Celebes) en het maleohoen (Macrocephalon maleo Sol. Müller) in het bijxonder. Tectona, 39, 151–165.Google Scholar
Wheeler, B. A., Prosen, E., Mathis, A., & Wilkinson, R. F. (2002). Population declines of a long-lived salamander: A 20+ year study of hellbenders, Cryptobranchus alleganiensis. Biological Conservation, 109, 151–156.Google Scholar
Wines, M. P., Johnson, V. M., Lock, B., Antonio, F., Godwin, J. C., Rush, E. M., & Guyer, C. (2015). Optimal husbandry of hatchling eastern indigo snakes (Drymarchon couperi) during a captive head-start program. Zoo Biology, 34, 230–238.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by