Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Deduction
- Contents
- From Aristotle to Hörl
- Preface to the German Edition
- Preface to the English Translation
- Deduction
- Introduction
- Part I In the Shadow of Formalization: A History of Thinking
- Part II The Specter of the Primitive: A Hauntology of Communication
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index of Names
1 - Blind Thinking around 1900: The Turn from the Intuitive to the Symbolic
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 February 2021
- Frontmatter
- Deduction
- Contents
- From Aristotle to Hörl
- Preface to the German Edition
- Preface to the English Translation
- Deduction
- Introduction
- Part I In the Shadow of Formalization: A History of Thinking
- Part II The Specter of the Primitive: A Hauntology of Communication
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index of Names
Summary
Abstract
The chapter presents the main aspects of the great transformation from the intuitive to the symbolic, the key epistemic movement of the second half of the nineteenth century. Around 1900, the crisis of intuition—which resulted from the arithmetization of mathematics, the elaboration of non-Euclidian geometries, the field theoretical turn in physics, and the calculization of formal logic—weighed heavily on the entire space of knowledge. It came to a head in the philosophical confrontation about the matter of thinking, about whether thinking was grounded intuitively or symbolically. The new age of symbolic thinking that began there— whose agenda was nothing short of the purely formal description of what had previously been unthought and unthinkable about thinking itself, indeed about the reality of the mind—pushed the autonomization and ultimately the machinization of the symbolic. Leibniz—a very specific Leibniz, mobilized around 1900 particularly by the French philosopher and mathematician Louis Couturat as a pioneer of the blind use of symbols against Kant and the primacy of intuition—is being turned into the philosophical godfather of this movement.
Keywords: intuitionism versus formalism; crisis of intuition; calculization of thinking; purely symbolic thinking; Louis Couturat
Thinking the unthinkable
Talking about the contemporary relationship between logic and philosophy in a lecture at the Collège de France on December 8, 1905, philosopher and mathematician Louis Couturat did not mince his words. In giving his inaugural address, the thirty-seven-year-old representative of symbolic logic was acutely aware what an event it was to offer a course on the “History of Modern Formal Logic” in the heart of discursive power. The brilliant apology of symbolic thinking to which the audience was listening parsed the deep structure of a space of knowledge in upheaval.
Not since Barthélemy-Saint-Hilaire's interpretations of Aristotle's logic had the institution that ensured the order of discourse allowed anyone to speak on the subject. Kant's dictum about the “secure course” of logic, which “since the time of Aristotle … has not had to go a single step backwards” but had “also been unable to take a single step forward,” had served to legitimize the refusal to accord a place to the new exact science of thinking modeled on mathematics, which had been on the rise since the second half of the nineteenth century.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Sacred ChannelsThe Archaic Illusion of Communication, pp. 47 - 72Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2018