Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:34:21.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - A Dynamic Ecological Systems Perspective on Emotion Regulation Development within the Sibling Relationship Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2009

Frieder R. Lang
Affiliation:
Martin Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenburg, Germany
Karen L. Fingerman
Affiliation:
Purdue University, Indiana
Victoria Hilkevitch Bedford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, 1701 Circle Drive, Rawles Hall, Bloomington, IN 47401
Brenda L. Volling
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 525 East University, East Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1109
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents a dynamic ecological systems model of emotion regulation. We focus on the course of the sibling relationship across the life span, making note of the connections between individuals' developing capacity to regulate their own emotions and the interpersonal nature of the sibling relationship. We introduce the concept of emotion other-regulation and note how siblings attempt to regulate their own emotions through attempts to influence others. We lay out a developmental timeline showing how parents regulate the relationship between their children during early childhood and how this parental control is slowly relinquished over time such that older children, adolescents, and adults become more responsible for the interpersonal regulation in their sibling relationship and, in turn, their own emotion self-regulation.

An ecological perspective on human development underscores the importance of examining child and adult development within multiple contexts and the necessity of examining intraindividual change along with change in the family, community, and cultural contexts in which individuals live. This volume is devoted to understanding change in personal relationships over time from the early years of childhood through the later years of adulthood. In the current chapter, we use a dynamic ecological systems perspective to examine the sibling relationship as a context for the development of emotion regulation in both childhood and adulthood. Development is defined according to the principles of the life-span perspective. Thus, development is lifelong, multidimensional, multidirectional, and contextual (Baltes, 1987).

Type
Chapter
Information
Growing Together
Personal Relationships Across the Life Span
, pp. 76 - 102
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, V. H. (1989). A comparison of thematic apperceptions of sibling affiliation, conflict, and separation at two periods of adulthood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 53–65CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedford, V. H. (1995). Sibling relationships in middle adulthood and old age. In R. Blieszner & V. H. Bedford (Eds.), Handbook on aging and the family (pp. 201–222). Westport, CT: Greenwood
Bedford, V. H. (1998). Sibling relationship troubles and well-being in middle and old age. Family Relations, 47, 369–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedford, V. H., & Avioli, P. S. (2001). Variations on sibling intimacy in old age. Generations, 25, 34–40Google Scholar
Bedford, V. H., Rains, S. E., & Guseilla, K. J. (2000, August). Midlife changes in TAT stories about siblings: A prospective study. Paper presented at the 108th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
Bedford, V. H., Rains, S. E., Ramagotsis, S., & Smith, C. (2001, November). Simultaneous trajectories of continuity and change in relationships between middle-aged brothers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Gerontological Society of America, Chicago
Bedford, V. H., Volling, B. L., & Avioli, P. S. (2000). Positive consequences of sibling conflict in childhood and adulthood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 51, 53–67CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brody, G. H., Stoneman, Z., & McCoy, J. K. (1992). Associations of maternal and paternal direct and differential behavior with sibling relationships: Contemporaneous and longitudinal analyses. Child Development, 63, 82–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos, J., Campos, R., & Barrett, K. (1989). Emergent themes in the study of emotional development and emotion regulation. Developmental Psychology, 25, 394–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstensen, L. L. (1992). Social and emotional patterns in adulthood: Support for socioemotional selectivity theory. Psychology and Aging, 7, 331–338CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carstensen, L. L., Gross, J. J., & Fung, H. H. (1997). The social context of emotional experience. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, Vol. 17 (pp. 325–352). New York: Springer
Cassidy, J. (1994). Emotion regulation: Influences of attachment relationships. Monographs of the Society for Research on Child Development, 59(2–3), 228–249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, W. A., & Laursen, B. (Eds.) (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, Vol. 30. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Diehl, M., Coyle, N., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (1996). Age and sex differences in strategies of coping and defense across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 11, 127–139CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunn, J. (1988). The beginnings of social understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Dunn, J. F. (1993). Young children's close relationships: Beyond attachment. Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications
Dunn, J., & Kendrick, C. (1982). Siblings: Love, envy, and understanding. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Dunn, J., & Plomin, R. (1991). Why are siblings so different? The significance of differences in sibling experiences within the family. Family Process, 30, 271–283CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton
Garcia, M. M., Shaw, D. S., Winslow, E. B., & Yaggi, K. E. (2000). Destructive sibling conflict and the development of conduct problems in young boys. Developmental Psychology, 36, 44–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetting, A. (1986). The developmental tasks of siblingship over the life cycle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 703–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, D. T. (1989). Sibling relationships in old age: A typology. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 28, 37–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 74, 224–237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, P. L., & Cavanaugh, R. D. (1993). Young children's understanding of pretense. Monographs of the Society for Research on Child Development, 58 (1, Serial No. 231), v–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1999). Relationships as developmental contexts: Retrospective themes and contemporary issues. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Relationships as developmental contexts. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 13–35). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Hochschild, A. R. (1973). The unexpected community. Berkeley: University of California
Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keltner, D. (1996). Facial expressions of emotion and personality. In C. Magai & S. McFadden (Eds.), Handbook of emotion, adulthood, and aging (pp. 385–401). San Diego: AcademicCrossRef
Kochanska, G. (1991). Socialization and temperament in the development of conscience. Child Development, 62, 1379–1392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochanska, G., & Askan, N. (1995). Mother-child mutually positive affect, the quality of child compliance to requests and prohibitions, and maternal control as correlates of early internalization. Child Development, 68, 94–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanska, G., Tbjekes, T. L., & Forman, D. R. (1998). Children's emerging regulation of conduct: Restraint, compliance, and internalization from infancy to the second year. Child Development, 69, 1378–1389CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kopp, C. (1989). Regulation of distress and negative emotions: A developmental view. Developmental Psychology, 25, 343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labouvie-Vief, G., Devoe, M., & Bulka, D. (1989). Speaking about feelings: Conceptions of emotions across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 4, 425–437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labouvie-Vief, G., & Medler, M. (2002). Affect optimization and affect complexity: Modes and styles of regulation in adulthood. Psychology and Aging, 17, 571–587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laverty, R. (1962). Reactivation of sibling rivalry in older people. Social Work, 7, 23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P. (1989). Environmental proactivity and affect in older people. In S. Spacapan & S. Oshamp (Eds.), The social psychology of aging (pp. 135–163). Newbury Park: Sage
Lawton, M. P., & Albert, S. M. (1990, August). Affective self-management across the life span. In A. J. Zautra (Chair), “The longitudinal study of elder health and well-being,” symposium conducted at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Boston
Levenson, R. W., Carstensen, L. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1994). The influence of age and gender on affect, physiology, and their interrelations: A study of long-term marriages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 56–68CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKinnon-Lewis, C. E., Starnes, R., Volling, B. L., & Johnson, S. (1997). Perceptions of parenting as predictors of boys' sibling and peer relations. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1024–1031CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Magai, C., & Passman, V. (1997). The interpersonal basis of emotional behavior and emotion regulation in adulthood. In K. Warner Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics (pp. 104–137), Vol. 17. New York: Springer
Malatesta, C., & Kalnok, M. (1984). Emotional experience in younger and older adults. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 301–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malatesta-Magai, C. Z., Jonas, R., Shepard, B., & Culvert, C. (1992). Type A personality and emotional expressivity in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 7, 551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munn, P., & Dunn, J. (1986). Siblings and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 9, 265–284Google Scholar
Patterson, G. R. (1977). Accelerating stimuli for two classes of coercive behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 5, 334–350CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patterson, G. R. (1986). The contribution of siblings to training for fighting: A microsocial analysis. In D. Olweus, J. Block, & M. Radke-Yarrow (Eds.), Development of antisocial and prosocial behavior (pp. 235–261). New York: Academic Press
Perner, J., Ruffman, T., & Leekam, S. R. (1994). Theory of mind is contagious: You catch it from your sibs. Child Development, 65, 1228–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, K. S., & Ituarte, P. H. G. (1999). Social control, social support, and companionship in older adults' family relationships and friendships. Personal Relationships, 6, 199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. G., & Milgram, J. I. (1982). Important variables in adult sibling relationships: A qualitative study. In M. E. Lamb & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Sibling relationships: Their nature and significance across the life span (pp. 225–249). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Ruffman, T., Perner, J., Naito, M., Parkin, L., & Clements, W. A. (1998). Older (but not younger) siblings facilitate false belief understanding. Developmental Psychology, 34, 161–174CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saarni, C. (1997). Emotional competence and self-regulation in childhood. In P. Salovey & D. J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence (pp. 35–66). New York: Basic Books
Sameroff, A. J., & Emde, R. N. (Eds.) (1989). Relationship disturbances in early childhood: A developmental approach. New York: Basic Books
Shortt, J. W., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Closeness in young adult sibling relationships: Affective and physiological processes. Social Development, 6, 142–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sroufe, L. A. (1996). Emotional development: The organization of emotional life in the early years. New York: Cambridge University Press
Stoneman, Z., & Brody, G. H. (1993). Sibling temperaments, conflict, warmth, and role asymmetry. Child Development, 64, 1786–1800CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, M., Cartwright, L. E., & Carlson, S. M. (1993). A developmental investigation of children's imaginary companions. Developmental Psychology, 29, 276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, E. (1989). Self-organization in developmental processes: Can systems approaches work? In M. R. Gunnar and E. Thelen (Eds.), Systems and development. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology (Vol. 22, pp. 77–117). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: A theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59 (2–3, Serial No. 240), 25–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomkins, S. S. (1962). Affect, imagery, consciousness, Vol. 1: The positive affects. New York: Springer
Tomkins, S. S. (1963). Affect, imagery, and consciousness, Vol. 2: The negative affects. New York: Springer
Tronick, E. Z. (1989). Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist, 44, 112–119CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tucker, C. J., Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1999). Older siblings as socializers of younger siblings' empathy. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19, 176–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volling, B. L., & Belsky, J. (1992). The contribution of mother-child and father-child relationships to the quality of sibling interaction: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 63, 1209–1222CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volling, B. L., McElwain, N. L., & Miller, A. L. (2002). Emotion regulation in context: The jealousy complex between young siblings and its relations with child and family characteristics. Child Development, 73, 581–600CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youngblade, L. M., & Dunn, J. (1995). Individual differences in young children's pretend play with mother and sibling: Links to relationships and understanding of other people's feelings and beliefs. Child Development, 66, 1472–1492CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×