Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:36:59.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

20 - Contributing to fisheries sustainability through the adoption of a broader ethical approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2009

Tracy Dobson
Affiliation:
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 13 Natural Resource Building East Lansing, MI 48824USA
Henry A. Regier
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Studies University of Toronto; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 10 Ernst Street Elmira, ON, N3B 1K5 Canada
William W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Michael G. Schechter
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Lois G. Wolfson
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access

Summary

Fishing is a human right for the many, not for the few.

INTRODUCTION

We begin with a background discussion highlighting the global fisheries crisis that implies need for expanded application of ethical consideration to fisheries. A general discussion of ethics follows to provide some context for particular applications to fisheries governance. We outline principles in law and policy that may reverse the present fisheries downward spiral. Discussed are the role of science and risk assessment, the precautionary principle, the public trust doctrine, an effective female work model, effective commons management, and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (FAO 1995). Some recommendations are based on proven results; others rest on speculation, as one might expect within a regime of adaptive management. In each instance, we endorse changes in management behavior on the part of all participants that should result in sustainable and equitably shared fisheries.

Modern technology, that sometimes useful, sometimes dreadful set of human inventions, has facilitated the emergence of environmental crises around the globe. Among all species, we are the one that has found the most effective ways to escape natural constraints, for a period of time, by employing technology to satisfy our myriad, insatiable needs and desires. We know that early humans using simple techniques such as spears extinguished species in North America and Australia. But now we have positioned ourselves to extinguish not just a species here and there, but thousands of species and vast ecosystems in a very short time-frame.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakan, J. 2004. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. Toronto, Ontario: Viking Canada.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 2002. Cross-scale institutional linkages: perspectives from the bottom up. In The Drama of the Commons, eds. Ostrom, E., Dietz, T., Dolsak, N., et al. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 293–321.Google Scholar
Blum, D. 1997. Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences between Men and Women. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Bratspies, R. 2003. Finessing King Neptune: fisheries management and the limits of international law. Harvard Environmental Law Review 25: 213–258.Google Scholar
Busch, W.-D. N., Brown, B. L., and Mayer, G. F. (eds.) 2003. Strategic Guidance for Implementing an Ecosystem-Based Approach to Fisheries Management. Silver Springs, MD: National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce.Google Scholar
Cairns, J. Jr. 2001. Exuberant optimism vs the precautionary principle. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 2001: 46–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
California Supreme Court. 1983. Audubon Society v. Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 464 U.S. 977; 104 S. Ct. 413; 78L. Ed. 2d 351.
Carson, R. 1950. The Sea around Us. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carson, R. 1962. Silent Spring. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Chua, A. 2003. World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Coxe, D. E. 2003. The New Reality of Wall Street. Toronto, Ontario: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Dobson, T., Regier, H. A., and Taylor, W. W. 2002. Governing human interactions with migratory animals, with a focus on humans interacting with fish in Lake Erie: then, now, and in the future. Canada–U.S. Law Journal 28: 389–446.Google Scholar
Dodd, D. 2000. The Great Gulf: Fishermen, Scientists, and the Struggle to Revive the World's Greatest Fishery. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Doulman, D. J. and Willmann, R. 2006. The Future of the Code of Conduct. Rome: Fisheries Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
EEA. 2001. Consolidated Version of the Treaty Establishing the European Community, Title XIX, Environment, Article 172.2. Brussels: EEA.
Eagly, A. and Johannesen-Schmidt, M. 2001. Leadership styles of women and men. Journal of Social Issues 57: 781–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EC (European Community). 2004. Common Fisheries Policy. Available online at www.jncc.gov.uk/marine/fisheries/reports/rpt_precautionary.html
Ehrlich, P. 2002. Human natures, nature conservation, and environmental ethics. BioScience 52: 31–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. 2003. The Empty Ocean. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Ewel, K. C. 2001. Natural resource management: the need for interdisciplinary collaboration. Ecosystems 4: 716–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1995. Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
FAO. 2006. Implementation of the 1995 FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries, International Institutions and Liaison Service. Available online at www.fao.org/fi/ipa/ipae.asp
Fehr, E. and Rockenbach, B. 2003. Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature 442: 137–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisheries Recovery Act. 2000. HB 4046, 106th Congress, 2000.
Francis, R. C. 2002. Some thoughts on sustainability and marine conservation. Fisheries 27(1): 18–22.Google Scholar
Gibbs, L. 1997. Dying from Dioxin: A Citizen's Guide to Reclaiming our Health and Rebuilding Democracy. Montreal, Quebec: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, R. 1993. Forcing the Spring: The Transformation of the American Environmental Movement. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162: 1243–1248.Google ScholarPubMed
Healy, S. 1999. Extended peer communities and the ascendance of post-normal politics. Futures 31: 655–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois. 1892. 146 U.S. 387, 13 S. Ct. 110, 36 L. Ed. 1018.
International Summit on Science and the Precautionary Principle. 1998. Summit Report. Available online at www.uml.edu/centers/LCSP/precaution/back.over.html
Joseph, S. 2004. Women advocates in Great Lakes conservation. Master's thesis, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Kanter, R. 1993. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Kurlansky, M. 1997. Cod: A Biography of the Fish that Changed the World. New York: Putnam.Google Scholar
Loftus, K. H. and Regier, H. A. (eds.) 1972. Proceedings of the Salmonid Communities in Oligotrophic Lakes (SCOL) Symposium, 1971. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29: 613–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, C. 1996. Earthcare: Women and the Environment. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mohai, P. 1992. Men, women, and the environment: an examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Society and Natural Resources 5: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morito, B. 2002. Thinking Ecologically: Environmental Thought, Values, and Policy. Black Point, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.Google Scholar
Murphy, R. 1994. Rationality and Nature: A Sociological Inquiry into a Changing Relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Myers, R. A. and Worm, B. 2003. Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities. Nature 423: 280–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Brien, M. 2000. Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative to Risk Assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, M. 1994. Introduction: Liberate, accumulate – and bust? In Is Capitalism Sustainable: Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology, ed. O'Connor, M.. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
O'Connor, M. 1999. Dialogue and debate in a post-normal practice of science: a reflexion. Futures 31: 671–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., Dietz, I., Dolsak, T. N., et al. (eds.) 2002. The Drama of the Commons. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Pauly, D. and Maclean, J. 2003. InA Perfect Ocean: The State of Fisheries and Ecosystems in the North Atlantic Ocean. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Pew Oceans Commission. 2003. America's Living Oceans: Charting a Course for Sea Change. Philadelphia, PA: Pew Charitable Trust.
Ravetz, J. R. 1986. Usable knowledge, usable ignorance: incomplete science with policy implications. In Sustainable Development of the Biosphere, eds. Clark, W. C. and Munn, R. E.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 415–432.Google Scholar
Ravetz, J. R. (ed.) 1999. Special issue: Post-normal science. Futures31.
Regier, H. A. 1988. Will we ever get ahead of the problem? In Aquatic Toxicology and Water Quality Management, Vol. 1, eds. Nriagu, J. O. and Lakshminarayana, J. S. S.. New York: John Wiley, pp. 1–5.Google Scholar
Regier, H. A. and Kay, J. J. 2001. Phase shifts and flip flops. In Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, vol. 5, ed. Munn, R. E.. Chichester, UK: John Wiley. pp. 422–429.Google Scholar
Roush, G. J. 1989. The disintegrating web: the causes and consequences of extinction. Nature Conservancy Magazine 39: 6.Google Scholar
Russell, C. S. 2001. Applying Economics to the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salleh, A. 1994. Nature, woman, labor, capital: living the deepest contradiction. In Is Capitalism Sustainable: Political Economy and the Politics of Ecology, ed. O'Connor, M.. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 106–124.Google Scholar
Sanders, S. R. 1998. The stuff of life. Audubon July/August, 1998.
Sax, J. 1970. The public trust doctrine in natural resource law: effective judicial intervention. Michigan Law Review 68: 471–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1997. Population: delusion and reality. In The Gender Sexuality Reader: Culture, History, Political Economy, eds. Lancaster, R. and Leonardo, M. Di. New York: Routledge, pp. 89–106.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. 1988. Staying Alive: Women, Ecology and Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Smeeding, T. M. 2004. Public Policy and Economic Inequality: the United States in Comparative Perspective, Working Paper No. 367, Luxembourg Income Study Working Paper Series. Syracuse, NY: Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University.
Solomon, L. S., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., and Risman, B. J. 1989. The gender gap and nuclear power: attitudes in a politicized environment. Sex Roles 21: 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steingraber, S. 1999. Living Downstream: An Ecologist Looks at Cancer and the Environment. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., and Kalof, L. 1993. Value orientations, gender and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 25: 322–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stiglitz, J. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Taylor, D. 1997. American environmentalism: the role of race, class and gender in shaping activism 1820–1995. Race, Gender and Class 5: 16–59.Google Scholar
Urstadt, B. 2003. One-act farce: deregulation by disputation. Harper's Magazine June 2003: 52–53.Google Scholar
Wikipedia. 2004. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_economicus.
Wilson, E. O. 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1978. On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Young, O. 2002. Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In The Drama of the Commons, eds. Ostrom, E.. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, pp. 259–291Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×