Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:24:38.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DEMOGRAPHY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Andrew T. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Get access

Summary

PAST POPULATION STRUCTURE

Background to the palaeodemography debate

Prior to the 1930s most studies of human palaeodemography relied on historical records such as commemorative inscriptions and censuses as sources of mortality and survivorship data. Following pioneering work by T. W. Todd (1920, 1924) on the timing of age-related changes in the adult human skeleton there emerged new opportunities to utilise anthropological data in palaeodemography (Acsádi and Nemeskéri, 1970: 51–57). Early applications of skeletal evidence for estimating age at death in palaeodemography include the demographic analysis of skeletons from Pecos Pueblo (Hooton, 1930) and a study by Vallois (1937) of longevity in European Palaeolithic and Mesolithic populations. During the second half of the twentieth century there was a proliferation of publications on the age structure of skeletal samples, and palaeodemographic studies became almost a routine aspect of the laboratory analysis of large series of large assemblages of excavated skeletons.

In this early phase of palaeodemography methodological concerns focused on ensuring that skeletal samples were representative of the deaths that had occurred in the population, and that procedures for estimating sex and age at death were accurate (Angel, 1969; Acsádi and Nemeskéri, 1970: 57–58). The problem of under-representation of infants in skeletal samples was well recognised (e.g. Goldstein, 1953: 5; Howells, 1960: 167) and some workers also noted that young-adult deaths appeared to be over-represented in cemetery samples, most likely as a result of systematic bias in adult-age estimation (Goldstein, 1953: 5; Weiss, 1973: 59; Masset, 1976).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×