Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:22:54.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Distributing Political Power

The Constitutional Tribunal in Post-Authoritarian Chile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2013

Diana Kapiszewski
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Gordon Silverstein
Affiliation:
Yale Law School
Robert A. Kagan
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access

Summary

Democratic transition and consolidation in Chile are bounded by four important events: 1) constitutional reform under the military culminating in the 1980 Constitution; 2) the transfer of power to a newly elected democratic government in 1990; 3) significant reform of the Constitution in 2005; and 4) the successful transfer of power to an opposition government in 2010. With respect to each of these events, the contribution of the Chilean courts has been minimal. In fact, Ginsburg (Ch. 1 in this volume) classifies Chile as a case of “judicial irrelevance, in which courts play no discernible role, either as guarantors, triggers or consolidators” of democratic transition. It is widely accepted that neither the ordinary courts nor Chile's Constitutional Court, the Tribunal Constitucional (TC), have aggressively played a rights-based role (Couso 2003, 2004, 2005; Hilbink 2007). However, less often explored is the TC's power-distribution role – despite it being a court expressly designed to adjudicate separation of powers conflicts.

Once democracy was reestablished in 1990, political supporters of the former military regime – represented by the Alianza, an alliance of right and center-right parties – formed a formidable opposition to the center-left-governing Concertación coalition, and turned to the courts as one of multiple political strategies to defend the status quo and promote their political agenda. Over the next fifteen years, the TC was called on to interpret and rearticulate the power relationships set out by the authoritarian regime under new political conditions of competitive democracy. Constitutional ambiguity with respect to the relationship between Legislative and Executive authority produced a series of separation-of-powers conflicts. This chapter is concerned with how the TC exercised its assigned functional role of distributing power in these controversies and how (and why) this role evolved.

Type
Chapter
Information
Consequential Courts
Judicial Roles in Global Perspective
, pp. 114 - 137
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Crichton, Alliende, José, Fernando. 2000. La Reserva de Ley. Memoria para optar al grado de licenciado en ciencias jurídicas y sociales. Facultad de Derecho, Departamento de Derecho Público, Universidad de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
Aróstica Maldonado, Iván. 1989. “Impugnabilidad de los Actos Administrativos,” Revista Chilena de Derecho (Universidad Católica) 16: 455–464.Google Scholar
Aróstica Maldonado, Iván. 1991. “¿Qué Queda de la ‘Presunción de Legalidad’?Revista de Derecho y Jurisprudencia 88(1): 1–7.Google Scholar
Aylwin Azócar, Arturo. 1984. “Límite de la Potestad Reglamentaria del Presidente de la República,” Revista Chilena de Derecho (Universidad Católica) 11: 449–453.Google Scholar
Baum, Lawrence. 2008. Judges and Their Audiences A Perspective on Judicial Behavior. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bertelsen Repetto, Raúl. 1985. “La Jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema sobre el Recurso de Inaplicabilidad,” Revista de Derecho Público (Universidad de Chile) 37–38 (Enero-Diciembre): 167–185.Google Scholar
Bertelsen Repetto, Raúl. 1993. “Sistemas de Control de Constitucionalidad entre1960–1989,” in Diagnostico Histórico Jurídico del Poder Legislativo en Chile. Valparaíso: Centro de Estudios y Asistencia Legislativa, Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.Google Scholar
Blanc Renard, Neville and Urquiaga, Emilio Pfeffer. 1989. Reflexiones en Torno al Equilibrio Ejecutivo – Parlamento, Documento de Trabajo No. 8. Santiago: Corporación de Estudio Liberales.Google Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. and Gibson, James L.. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court,” American Journal of Political Science 36: 635–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldera Delgado, Hugo. 1980. “Bases para el Control Jurídico de la Potestad Reglamentaria Autónoma Contemplada en el Anteproyecto de la Nueva Constitución,” Décimas Jornadas Chilenas de Derecho Público (Edeval, 1980): 187–191.Google Scholar
Carey, John M. and Shugart, Matthew Soberg (eds.). 1998. Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmona Santander, Carlos. 1998. “Tendencias del Tribunal Constitucional en al Relación Ley-Reglamento,” Revista de Derecho Público 61 (1998–1999): 180–192.Google Scholar
Carmona Santander, Carlos. 2001. “Tres Problemas de la Potestad Reglamentaria: Legitimidad, Intensidad y Control,” Revista de Derecho (Consejo de Defensa del Estado) 1(3): 29–62.Google Scholar
Cea Egaña, José Luis. 1988. “Visión de la Presidencia y el Congreso en la Constitución de 1980,” in Constitución 1980: Estudio Crítico. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica Ediar – ConoSur Ltda.Google Scholar
Cea Egaña, José Luis. 1989. “La Separación de Poderes en la Democracia Constitucional Chilena,” in La Experiencia Constitucional Norteamericana y Chilena sobre la Separación de Poderes, Judiciales, Instituto de Estudios (ed). Santiago: Ediar – Conosur.Google Scholar
Cea Egaña, José Luis. 1998. “Los Principios de Reserva Legal y Complementaria en la Constitución Chilena,” Revista de Derecho (Universidad Austral) IX: 65–104.Google Scholar
Chavez, Rebecca Bill. 2004. The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies: Judicial Politics in Argentina. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Correa Sutíl, Jorge. 1988. “La Cultura Jurídica Chilena en Relación a la Función Judicial,” in La Cultura Jurídica Chilena, Squella, A. (ed). Santiago: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2003. “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Democratic Transition 1990–2002,” Democratization 10(4): 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couso, Javier A. 2004. “The Politics of Judicial Review in Chile in the Era of Domestic Transition, 1990–2002,” in Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Robert, and Skaar, Elin (eds.). Portland, OR: Frank Cass Publishers: 70–91.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier A. 2005. “The Judicialization of Chilean Politics: The Rights Revolution that Never Was,” in The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America, Sieder, Rachel, Schjolden, Line, and Angell, Alan (eds.). New York: Palgrave: 105–129.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2010. “The Transformation of Constitutional Discourse and the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America,” in Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press: 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couso, Javier and Hilbink, Lisa. 2011. “From Quietism to Incipient Activism: The Institutional and Ideational Roots of Rights Adjudication in Chile,” in Courts in Latin America, Helmke, Gretchen and Ríos-Figueroa, Julio (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 99–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker,” Journal of Public Law VI(2): 279–295.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. 2001. “The Role of Constitutional Courts in the Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government,” Law & Society Review 35(1): 117–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faundez, Julio. 2010. “Chilean Constitutionalism before Allende: Legality without Courts,” Bulletin of Latin American Research 29(1): 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González, Fernández, Ángel, Miguel. 2006. Los Derechos Fundamentales en 25 Años de Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional 1980–2005. Santiago: Tribunal Constitutional. Retrieved from .
Frei Ruiz-Tagle, Eduardo. 2000. Doctrina Constitucional de Presidente Eduardo Ruiz-Tagle Frei. Vol. Tomos 1 y 2. Santiago: División Jurídico Legislativo, Ministerio Secretaria General de la Presidencia.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernández Emparanza, Domingo. 2006. “Control de Constitucionalidad de Actos Administrativos por el Tribunal Constitucional. Precedentes Constitucionales,” Estudios Constitucionales 4(001): 207–222.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Elisabeth C. 2007. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship: Lessons from Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huneeus, Alexandra Valeria. 2010. “Judging from a Guilty Conscience: The Chilean Judiciary's Human Rights Turn,” Law & Social Inquiry 35(1): 99–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iaryczower, Matías, Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. “Judicial Decision Making in Unstable Environments, Argentina 1935–1998,” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 699–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto. 1994. “Forma de Gobierno, Distribución de Funciones y Controles Inter-órganos en el Régimen Político Chileno,” in División de Poderes, Jackisch, C. (ed.). Buenos Aires: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto. 1995. “El Tribunal Constitucional Chileno,” in Una Mirada a los Tribunales Constitucionales: Las Experiencias Recientes. Lima: Comisión Andina de Juristas.Google Scholar
Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto. 1997. “Los Tratados Internacionales en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Chileno,” Ius et Praxis 2(2): 7–62. Retrieved from .Google Scholar
Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto. 2003. “Los Derechos Esenciales o Humanos Contenido en los Tratados Internacionales y su Ubicación en el Ordenamiento Jurídico Nacional: Doctrina y Jurisprudencia,” Ius et Praxis 9(1): 403–466. ISSN 0718–0012. Retrieved from .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nogueira Alcalá, Humberto. 2007. “El Recurso de Protección en el Contexto del Amparo de los Derechos Fundamentales Latinoamericano e Interamericano,” Ius et Praxis 13(1): 75–134. ISSN 0718–0012. Retrieved from .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Núñez Poblete, Manuel A. 2010. “El Neoconstitucionalismo y el Recurso a los Valores en la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional Chileno,” Revista de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso 34: 523–541. ISSN 0718–6851. Retrieved from .Google Scholar
Peña González, Carlos. 1997. Práctica Constitucional y Derechos Fundamentales. Santiago: Corporación Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación.Google Scholar
Peña Torres, Marisol. 2006. “El Precedente Constitucional Emanado del Tribunal Constitucional y su Impacto en la Función Legislativa,” Estudios Constitucionales 4(001): 173–184.Google Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa. 2007. “The Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994–2002,” Latin American Politics & Society 49(1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Scribner, Druscilla L. 2004. “Limiting Presidential Power: Supreme Court Executive Relations in Argentina and Chile.” PhD Dissertation, Political Science, University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
Scribner, Druscilla. 2007. “The Political Dynamics of Vehicle Emissions: A Constitutional Tale of Public Policy in Santiago,” Journal of Latin American Urban Studies 8: 1–16.Google Scholar
Scribner, Druscilla. 2010. “The Judicialization of (Separation of Powers) Politics: Lessons from Chile,” Journal of Politics in Latin America 2(3): 71–97.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin. 2004. “Judicial Review in Developed Democracies,” in Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Robert, Skaar, Elin (eds.). Portland, OR: Frank Cass: 7–26.Google Scholar
Soto Kloss, Eduardo. 1977. “La Toma de Razón y el Poder Normativo de la Contraloría General de la República,” in La Contraloría General de la República, 50 Años de Vida Institucional (1927–1977). Santiago: Universidad deChile, Facultad de Derecho.Google Scholar
Soto Kloss, Eduardo. 1980. “Estado de Derecho y Procedimiento Administrativo,” Revista de Derecho Público (Universidad de Chile) 27–28: 101–124.Google Scholar
Soto Kloss, Eduardo. 1982. El Recurso de Protección:Orígenes, Doctrina y Jurisprudencia. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica deChile.Google Scholar
Soto Kloss, Eduardo. 1999. “Ley y Reglamento: Sus Relaciones en el Derecho Chileno,” Ius Publicum 3: 33–47.Google Scholar
Staton, Jeffrey. 2002. “Judicial Activism and Public Authority Compliance: The Role of Public Support in the Mexican Separation-of-Powers System.” PhD Dissertation, Department of Political Science, Washington University.Google Scholar
Tapia Valdés, Jorge. 1993. “Funciones y Atribuciones del Parlamento entre1960–1990,” in Diagnostico Histórico Jurídico del Poder Legislativo en Chile. Valparaíso: Centro de Estudios y Asistencia Legislativa, Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso: 85–132.Google Scholar
Valenzuela Somarriva, Eugenio. 1990. “Labor Jurisdiccional de al Corte Suprema,” Estudios Políticos 40(Primavera): 137–169.Google Scholar
Vanberg, Georg. 2005. The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vargas Viancos, Juan E. and Sutil, Jorge Correa. 1995. Diagnóstico del Sistema Judicial Chileno. Santiago de Chile: Corporación de Promoción Universitaria.Google Scholar
Verdudo Marinkovic, Mario and Urquiaca, Emilio Pfeffer. 1993. Constitución Política de la República de Chile 1980. Santiago: Editorial Juridica deChile.Google Scholar
Zapata Larraín, Patricio. 1991. “Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional: 1981–1991,” Revista Chilena de Derecho 18(2): 261–330.Google Scholar
Zapata Larraín, Patricio. 1993. “El Precedente en la Jurisprudencia Constitucional Chilena y Comparada,” Revista Chilena de Derecho 20: 449–508.Google Scholar
Zapata Larraín, Patricio. 1994. La Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. Santiago: Imprenta VIS Ltda.Google Scholar
Zapata Larraín, Patricio. 2002. La Jurisprudencia del Tribunal Constitucional. Santiago: Biblioteca Americana.Google Scholar
Cordero, Casas et al v. The National Customs Service (Rol No. 634, Aug. 9, 2007), written by Marisol Peña Torres. See also Peña Torres ()

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×