Foucauldian-Informed Discourse Analysis

doi:10.1017/9781108755146.016

13 - Foucauldian-Informed Discourse Analysis

from Part III - Methodological Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2021

Martine Robson and

Edited by

Carolin Demuth and

Michael Bamberg: Affiliation:
Clark University, Massachusetts
Carolin Demuth: Affiliation:
Aalborg University, Denmark
Meike Watzlawik: Affiliation:
Sigmund Freud University, Berlin

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Foucauldian-informed discourse analysis (also known as poststructuralist discourse analysis) is an important method for identity researchers because it focuses on the understandings people use to make sense of themselves. Foucauldian-informed discourse analysis examines what ideas people use to make sense of themselves; how these ideas come to be “thinkable” at that moment; and the consequences for what someone can say, think, feel or do when thinking with these ideas. In so doing, it offers a critical approach that also opens up directions for more affirmative ways of thinking. In this chapter, we explain some key concepts informing Foucauldian-informed research, including discourse and genealogy; power as productive, diffuse, and disciplinary; normalization, confession, and governmentality; and subject positions and technologies of self. We discuss how psychologists developing discourse analysis in the UK both engaged with, and blended, Foucauldian concepts with other linguist approaches, producing a diverse body of work. With no established procedure for Foucauldian-informed discourse analysis, this chapter offers two worked examples from separate projects related to identity and health, showing the reader how these concepts can be operationalized in the study of identities. Using an analysis of body mass index (BMI) and data from a study on how couples in long term relationships navigate lifestyle advice after a diagnosis of coronary heart disease, we showcase the value of Foucauldian-informed discourse analysis for identity researchers, particularly when identity is central in the organization of neoliberal societies.

Keywords

Foucault discourse analysis identity and health neoliberal societies power power relations

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge Handbook of Identity , pp. 285 - 303

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108755146.016 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Further Reading

Arribas-Ayllon, M. & Walkerdine, V. (2008). Foucauldian discourse analysis. In Willig, C. & Stainton-Rogers, W. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 91–108). London: Sage.Google Scholar

Atkinson, P. & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera’s immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304–325.Google Scholar

Bartky, S. L. (1997). Foucault, femininity and the modernization of patriarchal power. In Conboy, K., Medina, N., & Stanbury, S. (Eds.), Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory (pp. 129–154). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Billig, M., Condor, S., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. (1988). Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Braun, V. (2009). “The women are doing it for themselves”: The rhetoric of choice and agency around female genital “cosmetic surgery.” Australian Feminist Studies, 4(60), 233–249.CrossRef Google Scholar

Burkitt, I. (2008). Social Selves: Theories of Self and Identity, 2nd Ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Burman, E. & Parker, I. (Eds.). (1993). Discourse Analytic Research: Repertoires and Readings of Texts in Action. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Collins, P. H. & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, R. (1980). Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services, 10(3), 365–388.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Crawford, R. (2006). Health as a meaningful social practice. Sociology of Health and Illness, 10(4), 301–320.Google Scholar

Davies, B. (2013). Normalization and emotions. In Nygren, K. G. & Fahlgren, S. (Eds.), Mobilizing Gender Research: Challenges and Strategies. Sundsvall: Mid Sweden University.Google Scholar

Davies, B. & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal of Theory of Social Behaviour, 20(1), 43–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Duits, L. & Zoonen, L. V. (2011). Coming to terms with sexualization. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 14(5), 491–506.Google Scholar

Evans, A. & Riley, S. (2014). Technologies of Sexiness: Sex, Identity and Consumption. Oxford: University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar

Evans, A., Riley, S., & Shankar, A. (2010). Technologies of sexiness: Theorizing women’s engagement in the sexualization of culture. Feminism & Psychology, 20(1), 114–131.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972– 1977. New York, NY: Pantheon.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1984a). The History of Sexuality. Vol 2: The Use of Pleasure. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1984b). Polemics, politics, and problematizations. In Rabinow, P. (Ed.), The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought (pp. 381–390). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In Martin, L., Gutman, H., & Hutton, P. (Eds.), Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 16–49). Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (1994). Dits et écrits IV. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the College de France 1974–1975. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Gill, R. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism: A reply to Duits and van Zoonen. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(1), 69–80.Google Scholar

Gough, B. (Ed.). (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hall, S. (2001). Foucault: Power, knowledge and discourse. In Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (Eds.), Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader (pp. 72–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Harré, R. (1980). Social Being. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (1984). Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, Psychology and the Analytics of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Lerner, G. (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

King, N., Horrocks, C., & Brooks, J. (2018). Interviews in Qualitative Research, 2nd Ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Lupton, D. (2017). Digital Health: Critical and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Macleod, C. & Durrheim, K. (2002). Foucauldian feminism: The implications of governmentality. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 32(1), 41–60.Google Scholar

Magnusson, E. & Mareck, J. (2015). Doing Interview-Based Qualitative Research. A Learner’s Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Malson, H. (1988). The Thin Woman. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

McConville, A., Wetherell, M., McCreanor, T., Borell, B., & Moewaka Barnes, H. (2019). “Pissed off and confused”/”grateful and (re)moved”: Affect, privilege and national commemoration in Aotearoa New Zealand. Political Psychology. Online first, doi:10.1111/pops.12610.Google Scholar

McNay, L. (1992). Foucault and Feminism: Power, Gender and the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Owen, C. & Riley, S. (2019). A poststructuralist-informed inclusive masculinity theory (PS-IMT): Developing IMT to account for complexities in masculinities, using learning to dance Latin and ballroom as an example, Journal of Gender Studies, 29(5), 533–546, doi:10.1080/09589236.2019.1675498.Google Scholar

Parker, I. (1992). Discourse Dynamics: Critical Analysis for Social and Individual Psychology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse Analysis: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Ramazanoglu, C. (Ed.). (1993). Up against Foucault: Explorations of Some of the Tensions between Foucault and Feminism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Riley, S. (2002). Constructions of equality and discrimination in professional men’s talk. British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 443–461.Google Scholar

Riley, S., Evans, R., & Robson, M. (2018). Postfeminism and Health. London: Routledge.CrossRef Google Scholar

Riley, S., Thompson, J., & Griffin, C. (2010). Turn on, tune in, but don’t drop out: The impact of neo-liberalism on magic mushroom users (in)ability to imagine collectivist social worlds. International Journal of Drug Policy, 21, 445–451.Google Scholar

Riley, S. & Wiggins, S. (2018). Discourse analysis. In Sullivan, C. & Forrester, M., (Eds.), Doing Qualitative Research in Psychology: A Practical Guide (pp. 233–256). London: Sage. Youtube video www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYKuTHdFMPw.Google Scholar

Robles, T., Slatcher, R., Trombello, J., & McGinn, M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 140–187.CrossRef Google Scholar

Robson, M. (2016). Couples’ management of lifestyle change in health and after heart disease: A Foucauldian–Deleuzian approach. Doctoral thesis, Aberystwyth University.Google Scholar

Robson, M. & Riley, S. (2019). A Deleuzian rethinking of time in healthy lifestyle advice and change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(4), e12448, doi:10.1111/spc3.12448.Google Scholar

Rose, N. (1999). Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self. London: Free Association Books.Google Scholar

Walkerdine, V. (2002). Challenging Subjects: Critical Psychology for a New Millennium. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Walkerdine, V., Lucey, H., & Melody, J. (2001). Growing Up Girl. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar

West, S. (2015–). Philosophize This! Podcast, available at http://philosophizethis.org/.Google Scholar

Wetherell, M. (2007). A step too far: Discursive psychology, linguistic ethnography and questions of identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 661–681, doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00345.x.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wetherell, M. (2009). Identity in the 21st Century: New Trends in Changing Times. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wetherell, M. & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

World Health Organization. (2019). World health statistics 2019: Monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: WHO, retrieved May 02, 2021 from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/324835.Google Scholar

Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive Psychology: Theory, Method and Applications. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Willig, C. (2001). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar