Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T03:24:25.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

26 - Incentive Contracts

from Part III - Incentives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2021

Benjamin van Rooij
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Amsterdam
D. Daniel Sokol
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Abstract: This chapter explores the importance of verifiability to contractual provision of incentives for contract performance or compliance. The crucial role of evidence and evidence-disclosure decisions is highlighted. Parties to a contract dispute convey information to the court by disclosing evidence. Actions taken by the parties in the productive phase (or primary activity) of their relationship influence the evidence that is available should a dispute arise. These considerations are important for practitioners in that 1) the lack of evidence to prove one’s claim may lead to some productive relationships being avoided or undertaken at a less than optimal level, and 2) the primary activity of the parties may involve steps to ensure relevant evidence should a breach occur. Many practical examples are discussed.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, Gary. 1968. “Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.” Journal of Political Economy 76: 169217.Google Scholar
Bernheim, B. Douglas, and Whinston, Michael. 1999. “Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity.” American Economic Review 88: 902–32.Google Scholar
Bolton, Patrick, and Dewatripont, Mathias. 2005. Contract Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bull, Jesse. 2008a. “Mechanism Design with Moderate Evidence Cost.” B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8(1): article 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse. 2008b. “Costly Evidence Production and the Limits of Verifiability.” B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 8(1): article 18.Google Scholar
Bull, Jesse. 2009. “Costly Evidence and Systems of Fact-Finding.” Bulletin of Economic Research 61: 103–25.Google Scholar
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2004. “Evidence Disclosure and Verifiability.” Journal of Economic Theory 118: 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2007. “Hard Evidence and Mechanism Design.” Games and Economic Behavior 58: 7593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, Jesse, and Watson, Joel. 2019. “Statistical Evidence and the Problem of Robust Litigation.” RAND Journal of Economics 50(4): 9741003.Google Scholar
Cater, Bruce, Lew, Byron, and Pivato, Marcus. 2009. “Why Tenure?” Working paper.Google Scholar
Chakravarty, Surajeet, and MacLeod, W. Bentley. 2009. “Contracting in the Shadow of the Law.” RAND Journal of Economics 40(3): 533–57.Google Scholar
Deneckere, Raymond, and Severinov, Sergei. 2008. “Mechanism Design with Partial State Verifiability.” Games and Economic Behavior 64: 487513.Google Scholar
Fluet, Claude, and Lanzi, Thomas. 2018. “Adversarial Persuasion with Cross-Examination.” Working paper.Google Scholar
Hart, Oliver. 1995. Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Moral Hazard in Teams.” Bell Journal of Economics 13(2): 324–40.Google Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and Martimort, David. 2009. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Legros, Patrick, and Matthews, Steven. 1993. “Efficient and Nearly-Efficient Partnerships.” Review of Economic Studies 68: 599611.Google Scholar
Lipman, Barton, and Seppi, Duane. 1995. “Robust Inference in Communication Games with Partial Provability.” Journal of Economic Theory 66: 370405.Google Scholar
Mikkelson, David. 2001. “Did Van Halen’s Concert Contract Require the Removal of Brown M&Ms?” Snopes, www.snopes.com/fact-check/brown-out/.Google Scholar
Miller, Nolan. 1997. “Efficiency in Partnerships with Joint Monitoring.” Journal of Economic Theory 77: 285–99.Google Scholar
Moszoro, Marian, Spiller, Pablo T., and Stolorz, Sebastian. 2016. “Rigidity of Public Contracts.” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 13(3): 396427.Google Scholar
Roth, David Lee. 2012. “Brown M&Ms.” Vimeo, https://vimeo.com/36615187.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Alan, and Watson, Joel. 2013. “Conceptualizing Contractual Interpretation.” Journal of Legal Studies 42: 134.Google Scholar
Shin, Hyun Song. 1994. “The Burden of Proof in a Game of Persuasion.” Journal of Economic Theory 64: 253–64.Google Scholar
Zeveloff, Julie. 2016, “There’s a Brilliant Reason Why Van Halen Asked for a Bowl of M&Ms with All the Brown Candies Removed before Every Show.” Business Insider, September 7.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×