Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:20:07.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Sprinkler System for Research on Applying Herbicides in Irrigation Water

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. G. Ogg Jr.
A. G. Ogg Jr.*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res., Sci. Ed. Admin, U.S. Dep. Agric., Irrigated Agric. Res. and Ext. Center, Prosser, WA 99350
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A sprinkler system was developed that applied water to quadrant-shaped plots with a uniformity coefficient greater than 90% for any 2-m zone between 3 and 9 m from sprinklers that were located at the vertex of the quadrant. With this sprinkler system, many variables that affect the performance and behavior of herbicides applied in irrigation water can be studied. When applied through this sprinkler system in 1.4 cm of water, alachlor [2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-(methoxymethyl)acetanilide] at 3.3 kg/ha, EPTC (S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate) at 3.3 kg/ha, EPTC + trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) at 3.3 + 0.6 kg/ha, and EPTC + oryzalin (3,5-dinitro-N4,N4-dipropylsulfanilamide) at 3.3 + 0.8 kg/ha controlled barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.], common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and hairy nightshade (Solanum sarachoides Sendt.) selectively in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. ‘Pinto 114’).

Keywords

Phaseolus vulgarisweed controlalachlorEPTCdinitroanilines
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , March 1980 , pp. 201 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Binning, L. I., Harvey, R. G., and Weis, G. 1972. Application of EPTC through irrigation water to snap beans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 27:68.Google Scholar
2. Bode, L. E., Gebhart, M. E., and Day, C. L. 1968. Spray-deposit patterns and droplet sizes obtained from nozzles used for low-volume applications. Transactions of the ASAE 11(6):754–756, 761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Crutchfield, D. A., Clark, R. N., and Wiese, A. F. 1977. Disposition of atrazine and trifluralin with sprinkler water. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 30:428.Google Scholar
4. Cudney, D. W., Worker, G. F. Jr., and Hill, J. E. 1976. Sprinkler application of a sugar beet herbicide. California Agric. 30(8): 12.Google Scholar
5. Fischbach, P. E. and Martin, A. 1976. Application of herbicides through a center-pivot sprinkler. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. No. 247.Google Scholar
6. Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1976. Application of herbicides through sprinklers. Proc. Western Soc. Weed Sci. 29:59–73.Google Scholar
7. Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1977. Responses of potatoes and weeds to herbicides. Washington State Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 844. 10 pp.Google Scholar
8. Pair, C. H. (ed.). 1975. Sprinkler Irrigation, 4th ed. Sprinkler Irrig. Assoc., Silver Spring, Maryland. 615 pp.Google Scholar
9. Parochetti, J. V. and Hein, E. R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469–473.Google Scholar
10. Robinson, L. F. and Mulliner, H. R. 1972. Sprinkler applied herbicides do a good job in Nebraska tests. Weeds Today 3:6–7.Google Scholar
11. Shearer, M. N. 1971. Water distribution from a sprinkler lateral moving continuously in a linear direction. Oregon State Univ., Corvallis. Coop. Ext. Serv. Spec. Rep. 342. 10 pp.Google Scholar
12. Weed Science Society of America. 1974. Herbicide Handbook, 3rd Ed. WSSA, Champaign, Illinois. 430 pp.Google Scholar
13. Yates, W. E. 1962. Spray pattern analysis and evaluation of deposits from agricultural aircraft. Trans. ASAE 5 (1):49–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar