Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:26:46.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nitralin and Trifluralin Persistence in Soil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

K. E. Savage
K. E. Savage*
Affiliation:
Southern Weed Sci. Lab., Plant Sci. Res. Div., Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agr., Stoneville, MS. 38776
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Analysis of soil samples taken periodically from field plots on Dundee silty clay loam treated with single or dual annual applications of 4-(methylsulfonyl)-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropylaniline (nitralin) or α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine (trifluralin) at 0.84 or 1.68 kg/ha indicated dissipation of the herbicides to a low residual level within 3 to 4 months following each application. No accumulation was noted with either herbicide regardless of frequency or rate of application. Nitralin phytotoxicity to sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. ‘Dekalb 57E’) decreased more rapidly in soil that had received prior treatment with nitralin than in soil with no previous treatment. A microbiological influence is suggested because this effect was nullified by autoclaving the soil prior to herbicide treatment. This effect was not apparent with trifluralin. A survey of 250 fields indicated a significant, inverse correlation between nitralin and trifluralin residue level and soil pH. Nitralin persistence was greater in acid than in neutral soil.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , July 1973 , pp. 285 - 288
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, W. P., Richards, A. B., and Whitworth, J. W. 1968. Leaching of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin in soil columns. Weed Sci. 16:165–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bardsley, C. E., Savage, K. E., and Walker, J. C. 1968. Trifluralin behavior in soil. II. Volatilization as influenced by concentration, time, soil moisture content, and placement. Agron. J. 60:89–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Horowitz, M. 1969. Evaluation of herbicide persistence in soil. Weed Res. 9:314–321.Google Scholar
4. Messersmith, C. G., Burnside, O. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1971. Biological and non-biological dissipation of trifluralin from soil. Weed Sci. 19:285–290.Google Scholar
5. Oliver, L. R. and Frans, R. E. 1968. Inhibition of cotton and soybean roots from incorporated trifluralin and persistence in soil. Weed Sci. 16:199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Parka, S. J. and Tepe, J. B. 1969. The disappearance of trifluralin from field soils. Weed Sci. 17:119–122.Google Scholar
7. Probst, G. W., Golab, Tomasz, Herberg, R. J., Holzer, F. J., Parka, S. J., Van Der Schans, Cornelius, and Tepe, J. B. 1967. Fate of trifluralin in soils and plants. J. Agr. Food Chem. 15:592–599.Google Scholar
8. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1969. Trifluralin persistence as affected by depth of soil incorporation. Weed Sci. 17:349–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Wright, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1965. Photochemical decomposition of trifluralin. Weeds 13:329–331.Google Scholar