Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:28:28.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination and Characterization of the Effects of Fluometuron and MSMA on Chlorella

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

T. O. Blythe ,
S. M. Grooms  and
R. E. Frans
T. O. Blythe
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
S. M. Grooms
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
R. E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted on the effects of fluometuron [1,1-dimethyl-3-(α,α,α-trifluoro-m-tolyl)urea] on autotrophic growth (no sugar), heterotrophic growth (with sugar), and oxygen evolution and uptake and on the effects of MSMA (monosodium methanearsonate) on autotrophic growth and oxygen evolution and uptake by the unicellular green alga Chlorella pyrenoidosa Emerson strain (University of Texas). Two methods of analysis (probit and kinetic) were used to characterize the dosage-response of Chlorella to these herbicides. All measurements of Chlorella response to fluometuron were satisfactorily characterized by probit analysis, but only autotrophic cell number was adequately characterized by kinetic analysis. The fluometuron concentrations giving 50% inhibition on the probit plot were as follows: autotrophic cell number, 2.4 × 10−6M; chlorophyll at 400 nm, 3.3 × 10−6M; heterotrophic cell number, 2.4 × 10−6M; oxygen evolution, 20 × 10−6 M. The response of the alga to MSMA was stimulatory instead of inhibitory. Since this stimulation did not consistently range between 10 and 90% of the control, it was not possible to characterize the MSMA dosage-Chlorella response using either type of analysis.

Keywords

Autotrophic growthheterotrophic growthphotosynthesis
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , May 1979 , pp. 294 - 299
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Foy, C. L. and Penner, D. 1965. Effect of inhibitors and herbicides on tricarboxylic acid cycle substrate oxidation by isolated cucumber mitochondria. Weeds 13:226–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Frans, R. E., Lind, E. F., and Loomis, W. E. 1957. Kinetics of growth inhibition by herbicides. Plant Physiol. 32:301–307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Gowing, D. P. 1959. A method of comparing herbicides and assessing herbicide mixtures at the screening level. Weeds 7:66–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gramlich, J. V. and Frans, R. E. 1964. Kinetics of Chlorella inhibition by herbicides. Weeds 12:184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Holt, E. C., Faubion, J. L., Allen, W. W., and McBee, G. 1967. Arsenic translocation in nutsedge tuber systems and its effect on tuber viability. Weeds 15:13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Hurd-Karrer, A. M. 1939. Antagonism of certain elements essential to plants toward chemically related toxic elements. Plant Physiol. 14:9–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Katz, J. and Hassid, W. 1950. Arsenolysis of amylose and amylopectin. Arch. Biochem. 29:272–281.Google Scholar
8. Kay, E. 1965. Incorporation of radioarsenate into proteins and nucleic acids of the Ehrlich Lettre' ascites carcinoma in vitro . Nature 206:371–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Mackinney, G. 1941. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 140:315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. McDaniel, J. L. and Frans, R. E. 1969. Soybean mitochondrial response to prometryne and fluometuron. Weed Sci. 17:192–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Myers, J. 1950. The culture of algae for physiological studies. Pages 45–51 in Brunei, J., Prescott, G. W., and Tiffany, L. H., eds. The Culturing of Algae: A Symposium. The Charles F. Kettering Foundation, Yellow Springs, Ohio.Google Scholar
12. Rogers, R. L. and Funderburk, H. H. 1968. Physiological aspects of fluometuron in cotton and cucumber. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16:434–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Rothstein, A. and Donovan, K. 1963. Interactions of arsenate with the phosphate-transporting system of yeast. J. Gen. Physiol. 46:1075–1085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14. Rubin, B. and Eshel, Y. 1971. Phytotoxicity of fluometuron and its derivatives to cotton and weeds. Weed Sci. 19:592–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Sckerl, M. M. and Frans, R. E. 1969. Translocation and metabolism of MAA14C in johnsongrass and cotton. Weed Sci. 17:421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sikka, H. C. and Pramer, D. 1968. Physiological effects of fluometuron on some unicellular algae. Weed Sci. 16:296–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Ter Welle, H. F. and Slater, E. C. 1967. Uncoupling of respiratory-chain phosphorylation by arsenate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 143:1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18. Van Renson, J. J. S. 1971. Action of some herbicides in photosynthesis of Scenedesmus as studied by their effect on oxygen evolution, and cyclic photophosphorylation. Lab. Plant Physiol. Res. Agric. Univ. Wageningen, The Netherlands, 296th Communication.Google Scholar
19. Von Endt, D. W., Kearney, P. C., and Kaufman, D. D. 1968. Degradation of monosodium methanearsonic acid by soil microorganisms. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16:17–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Webb, J. L. 1963. Enzyme and Metabolic Inhibitors, Vol. 1. Academic Press, New York. pp. 861–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar