Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:48:41.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Establishment of an Astrometric Standard Region – A Description of the Method with Reference to the Astrometric Standard Region in Praesepe (M44)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 August 2017

Jane L. Russell
Jane L. Russell*
Affiliation:
Space Telescope Science Institute, Homewood Campus, Baltimore, MD 21218

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An astrometric standard catalog has been derived for the region centered on the Praesepe open star cluster. This catalog includes positions and proper motions of 408 objects on the system of the FK4 reduced from 9 catalogs and 145 plates from 15 different telescopes and spanning 110 years. The accuracy of the positions ranges from 0.01 to 0.15 arcsec and for the proper motions from 0.0002 to 0.004 arcsec/yr, depending on the number and quality of the observations. The method of catalog construction is an application of the central overlap technique.

Type
VIII. Objects
Information
Symposium - International Astronomical Union , Volume 109: Astrometric Techniques , 1986 , pp. 697 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1986 

References

Gatewood, G., and Eichhorn, H. K.; 1973. Astron. J. 78, pp. 769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatewood, G., and Fredrick, L. W.; 1971. Conference on Photographic Astrometric Technique, NASA Contractor's Report CR-1825, pp. 191–195.Google Scholar
Gould, B. A.; 1870. Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. IV, pp. 193.Google Scholar
Johnson, H. L.; 1952. Astrophys. J. 116, pp. 640–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J. L.; 1976. The Astrometric Standard Region in Praesepe (M44), , University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
Russell, J. L.; 1978. A Comparative Study of Trigonometric Parallax Reduction Techniques, Proceedings of IAU Colloquium No. 48 on Modern Astrometry, pp. 355–370.Google Scholar
Russell, J. L., and Gatewood, G.; 1985. in preparation.Google Scholar