Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:26:41.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compton Observatory Observations of AGN

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2016

J. D. Kurfess*
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The principal results on active galactic nuclei from the Phase 1 observations by the COMPTON Gamma Ray Observatory are presented. These include the detection of a new class of high-energy gamma ray sources by the EGRET instrument and extensive observations of Seyfert galaxies in low-energy gamma rays by OSSE. The identified EGRET sources are associated with core-dominated radio loud objects, OVV's and BL Lacs. EGRET has not detected any Seyfert galaxies. OSSE observes a thermal-like spectrum from NGC 4151, and the low-energy gamma ray spectra of other Seyferts are significantly softer than the spectra below 50 keV, suggesting that a thermal emission mechanism is characteristic of these objects. OSSE has not detected any positron annihilation radiation from any Seyfert, and neither OSSE nor COMPTEL have detected an MeV excess from these sources.

Type
New Observations of AGN with Specific Instruments
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1994 

References

Brown, K., et al., 1994, to be published in Proc. Second COMPTON Symposium.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C.E., et al., 1993a, presented at the 182nd AAS meeting, private communication.Google Scholar
Fichtel, C.E., et al., 1993b, AIP Conference Proceeding 280, 461.Google Scholar
Fishman, G.J. et al. 1989, Proceedings of the GRO Science Workshop, 239.Google Scholar
Hartman, R.C. et al., 1992 Ap. J., 385, L1 Google Scholar
Johnson, W.N. et al., 1994, to be published in Proc. Second COMPTON Symposium.Google Scholar
Johnson, W.N., et al., 1993, Ap. J. Supp. 86, 693.Google Scholar
Levine, A.M., et al., 1984, Ap. J. Supp., 54, 581.Google Scholar
Maisack, M., et al., 1993 Ap. J. 407, L61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paciesas, W.S., et al. 1993, AIP Conference Proceeding 280, 473.Google Scholar
Perotti, F, et al., 1981a, Ap. J. 247, L63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perotti, F., et al., 1981b, Nature, 292, 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Punch, M., et al., 1992, Nature 358, 477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, R.E., et al., 1983. Ap. J. 269, 423.Google Scholar
Swanenburg, B.N., et al., 1978, Nature 275, 298.Google Scholar
Schoenfelder, V., et al., 1993, Ap. J. Supp. 86, 657.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. J., et al., 1993, Ap. J. Supp. 86, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar