Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:18:44.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research Note The Skewed Sex Ratio in a Medieval Population: A Reinterpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2016

Michael Siegfried
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recent studies in social history suggest that the practice of female infanticide was widespread in early medieval society. While much of the work on female infanticide is sound, particularly the anthropological studies which observed the practice first hand, the interpretations of historical data are much less certain. In particular, data from the ninth-century French monastic tax rolls known as the Carolingian polyptychs are assumed to reflect female infanticide (Coleman, 1971; 1974; 1976; de Mause, 1974; Guttentag and Secord, 1983). The data recorded on the Polyptychs are biased in a manner reflecting the Church’s teachings and social functions, giving the impression of a skewed sex ratio favoring males in this population. Anthropological studies lead us to doubt that female infanticide was practiced to the extent suggested by the sex ratio on the polyptychs.

Type
Research Article
Information
Social Science History , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , Summer 1986 , pp. 195 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Social Science History Association 1986 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bishop, J. (1985) “Bishops as Marital Advisors in the Ninth Century,” in Kirshner, J. and Wemple, S. F. (eds.) Women of the Medical world. Oxford and New York: David Blackwell: 54–84.Google Scholar
Brundage, J. A. (1975) “Concubinage and marriage in medieval canon law.” Journal of Medieval History 1: 1–17.Google Scholar
Brundage, J. A. (1976) Prostitution in the Medieval Canon Law. Signs 1: 825–845.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. R. (1971) “Medieval marriage characteristics: a neglected factor in the history of medieval serfdom.” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2: 205–220.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. R. (1974) L’infanticide dans le Haut Moyen age. Annuales Economies Societes Civilisations 29: 315–335.Google Scholar
Coleman, E. R. (1976) “Infanticide in the early middle ages,” in Stuard, S. M. (ed.) Women in Medieval Society. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press: 47–70.Google Scholar
De Mause, L. (1974) “The evolution of childhood,” in Mause, L. De (ed.) The History of Childhood. New York: Psychohistory Press: 1–73.Google Scholar
Divale, W. T. and Harris, M. (1976) “Population, warfare, and the male supremacist complex.” American Anthropologist 78: 521–538.Google Scholar
Doehaerd, R. (1978) The Early Middle Ages in the West: Economy and Society. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Duby, G. (1979) The Early Growth of the European Economy: Warriors and Peasants From the Seventh to the Twelfth Century. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Guttentag, M. and Secord, P. F. (1983) Too Many Women: The Sex Ratio Question. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hammer, M. (1983) “Family and familia in early medieval Bavaria,” in Wall, (ed.) Family Forms in Historic Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 217–248.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1977) Cannibals and Kings: The Origins of Culture. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Herlihy, D. (1975) “Life expectancies of women in medieval society,” in Morewedge, R. T. (ed.) The Role of Women in the Middle Ages. Albany: State University of New York Press: 1–22.Google Scholar
Herlihy, D. (1978) “Medieval children,” in Volume 12, The Walter Prescott Webb Memorial Lectures: Essays on Medieval Civilization. Austin & London: University of Texas Press: 109–144.Google Scholar
Herlihy, D. (1984). “Household in the early middle ages: symmetry and sainthood,” in Wilk, McNetting R., and Arnold, E. J. (eds.) Households: Comparative and Historical Studies of the Domestic Groups. Berkeley: University of California Press: 383–406.Google Scholar
Jarrett, B. (1942) Social Theories of the Middle Ages: 1200–1500. Westminister, MD: The Newman Book Shop.Google Scholar
Langer, W. L. (1974) Infanticide in historical survey. History of Childhood Quarterly 1: 353–366.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. and Wall, R. (1974) Household and Family in Past Time. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longnon, A. (1886) Le polyptyque de l’abbage de Saint Germain-des-Près rédige au temps de l’abbé Irminon. Paris, 2 volumes.Google Scholar
McNamara, J. and Wemple, S. F. (1976) “Marriage and divorce in the frankish kingdom,” in Stuard, S. M. (ed.) Women in Medieval Society. Philadelphia: The University of Pennsylvania Press: 95–124.Google Scholar
Noonan, J. (1965) Contraception: A History of its Treatment by the Catholic Theologians and Canonists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petersen, W. (1975) Population. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Queen, S. A. and Habenstein, R. W. (1967) The Family in Various Cultures. Philadelphia and New York: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Ring, R. R. (1979) “Early medieval peasant household in central Italy.” Journal of Family History 4: 2–21.Google Scholar
Russell, J. C. (1958) Late ancient and medieval population. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 48: Part 3.Google Scholar
Troeltsch, E. (1960) The Social Teachings of the Christian Churches. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
Weinberger, S. (1973) “Peasant households in Provence ca. 800–1000.” Speculum 48: 247–257.Google Scholar
Wemple, S. F. (1981) Women in Frankish Society: Marriage and the Cloister 500 to 900. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Willigan, J. D. and Lynch, K. A. (1982) Sources and Methods of Historical Demography. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar