Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T10:43:34.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organic grain cropping systems to enhance ecosystem services

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2013

Michel A. Cavigelli*
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
Steven B. Mirsky
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
John R. Teasdale
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA.
John T. Spargo
Affiliation:
University of Massachusetts, West Experiment Station, 682 North Pleasant St., Amherst, MA 01003-9302, USA.
John Doran
Affiliation:
United States Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service, 118 Keim Hall, UNL-East Campus, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: michel.cavigelli@ars.usda.gov

Abstract

Organic grain cropping systems can enhance a number of ecosystem services compared with conventional tilled (CT) systems. Recent results from a limited number of long-term agricultural research (LTAR) studies suggest that organic grain cropping systems can also increase several ecosystem services relative to conventional no-till (NT) cropping systems: soil C sequestration and soil N fertility (N mineralization potential) can be greater while global warming potential (GWP) can be lower in organic systems that use animal manures and cover crops compared with conventional NT systems. However, soil erosion from organic systems and nitrous oxide (N2O, a greenhouse gas) emissions from manure-based organic systems appear to be greater than from conventional NT systems, though data are limited. Also, crop yields, on average, continue to be lower and labor requirements greater in organic than in both tilled and NT conventional systems. Ecosystem services provided by organic systems may be improved by expanding crop rotations to include greater crop phenological diversity, improving nutrient management, and reducing tillage intensity and frequency. More diverse crop rotations, especially those that include perennial forages, can reduce weed pressure, economic risk, soil erosion, N2O emissions, animal manure inputs, and soil P loading, while increasing grain yield and soil fertility. Side-dressing animal manures in organic systems may increase corn nitrogen use efficiency and also minimize animal manure inputs. Management practices that reduce tillage frequency and intensity in organic systems are being developed to reduce soil erosion and labor and energy needs. On-going research promises to further augment ecosystem services provided by organic grain cropping systems.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1American Society of Agronomy. 2010. Grand Challenge: Agronomy Feeds the World. Available at Web site https://www.agronomy.org/files/science-policy/asa-grand-challenge-2010.pdf (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
2Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N.D., O'Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C., Balzer, C., Bennett, E.M., Carpenter, S.R., Hill, J., Monfreda, C., Polasky, S., Rockstrom, J., Sheehan, J., Siebert, S., Tilman, D., and Zaks, D.P.M. 2011. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478:337342.Google Scholar
3Reganold, J.P., Jackson-Smith, D., Batie, S.S., Harwood, R.R., Kornegay, J.L., Bucks, D., Flora, C.B., Hanson, J.C., Jury, W.A., Meyer, D., Schumacher, A. Jr, Sehmsdorf, H., Shennan, C., Thrupp, L.A., and Willis, P. 2011. Transforming US agriculture. Science 332:670671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Pimentel, D., Hepperly, P., Hanson, J., Douds, D., and Seidel, R. 2005. Environmental, energetic, and economic comparisons of organic and conventional farming systems. BioScience 57:573582.Google Scholar
5Scialabba, N.E-H. and Muller-Lindenlauf, M. 2010. Organic agriculture and climate change. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 25:158169.Google Scholar
6Gomeiro, T., Pimentel, D., and Paoletti, M.G. 2011. Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs. organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30:95124.Google Scholar
7Soil Association. 2002. Soil Association Organic Standards and Certification (Revision 14 2002/03). Soil Association, Bristol, UK.Google Scholar
8National Research Council. 1989. Alternative Agriculture. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
9Greene, C., Slattery, E., and McBride, W.D. 2010. America's organic farmers face issues and opportunities. Amber Waves 2:3439.Google Scholar
10Organic Trade Association. 2012. Consumer-driven US Organic Market Surpasses $31 Billion in 2011. Available at Web site http://www.organicnewsroom.com/2012/04/us_consumerdriven_organic_mark.html (accessed May 8, 2012).Google Scholar
11Trewavas, A. 2004. A critical assessment of organic farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture. Crop Protection 23:757781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Cassman, K. 2007. Editorial response by Kenneth Cassman: Can organic agriculture feed the world—science to the rescue? Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:8384.Google Scholar
13Connor, D.J. 2008. Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crops Research 106:187190.Google Scholar
14Hendrix, J. 2007. Editorial response by Jim Hendrix. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:8485.Google Scholar
15Triplett, G.B. Jr and Dick, W.A. 2008. No-tillage crop production: A revolution in agriculture! Agronomy Journal 100:S153S165.Google Scholar
16Robertson, G.P., Paul, E.A., and Harwood, R.R. 2000. Greenhouse gases in intensive agriculture: Contributions of individual gases to the radiative forcing of the atmosphere. Science 289:19221925.Google Scholar
17Smith, R.G., Menalled, F.D., and Robertson, G.P. 2007. Temporal yield variability under conventional and alternative management systems. Agronomy Journal 99:16291634.Google Scholar
18Jokela, W., Posner, J., Hedtke, J., Balser, T., and Read, H. 2011. Midwest cropping system effects on soil properties and on a soil quality index. Agronomy Journal 103:15521562.Google Scholar
19Posner, J.L., Baldock, J.O., and Hedtke, J.L. 2008. Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: I. Productivity 1990–2002. Agronomy Journal 100:253260.Google Scholar
20Teasdale, J.R., Coffman, C.B., and Mangum, R.A. 2007. Potential long-term benefits of no-tillage and organic cropping systems for grain production and soil improvement. Agronomy Journal 99:12971305.Google Scholar
21Watkins, K.B., Lu, Y.-C., and Teasdale, J.R. 2002. Long-term environmental and economic simulation of alternative cropping systems in Maryland. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 20:6182.Google Scholar
22Cavigelli, M.A., Djurickovic, M., Mirsky, S.B., Maul, J.E., and Spargo, J.T. 2009. Global warming potential of organic and conventional grain cropping systems in the mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. In 2009 Farming Systems Design Proceedings, August 23–26, Monterey, California. p. 5152. Available Web site at http://www.iemss.org/farmsys09/uploads/2009_FSD_Proceedings.pdf (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
23Spargo, J.T., Cavigelli, M.A., Mirsky, S.B., Maul, J.E., and Meisinger, J.J. 2011. Mineralizable soil nitrogen and labile soil organic matter in diverse long-term cropping systems. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 90:253266.Google Scholar
24Green, V.S., Cavigelli, M.A., Dao, T.H., and Flanagan, D. 2005. Soil physical properties and aggregate-associated C, N, and P distributions in organic and conventional cropping systems. Soil Science 170:822831.Google Scholar
25Cavigelli, M.A., Teasdale, J.R., and Conklin, A.E. 2008. Long-term agronomic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic region. Agronomy Journal 100:785794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Teasdale, J.R. and Cavigelli, M.A. 2010. Subplots facilitate assessment of corn yield losses from weed competition in a long-term cropping systems experiment. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 30:445453.Google Scholar
27Cavigelli, M.A., Hima, B.L., Hanson, J.C., Teasdale, J.R., Conklin, A.E., and Lu, Y.-C. 2009. Long-term economic performance of organic and conventional field crops in the mid-Atlantic region. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 24:102119.Google Scholar
28Teasdale, J.R., Mangum, R.A., Radhakrishnan, J. and Cavigelli, M.A. 2004. Weed seedbank dynamics in three organic farming crop rotations. Agronomy Journal 96:14291435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Hanson, J.C., Lichtenberg, E., and Peters, S.E. 1997. Organic versus conventional grain production in the mid-Atlantic: An economic and farming system overview. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12:29.Google Scholar
30Hepperley, P.R., Douds, D., and Seidel, R. 2006. The Rodale Institute Farming Systems Trial 1981 to 2005: Long-term analysis of organic and conventional maize and soybean cropping systems. In Raupp, J., Pekrun, C., Oltmanns, M., and Kopke, U. (eds). Long-Term Field Experiments in Organic Farming. ISOFAR Scientific Series, Berlin. p. 1532.Google Scholar
31Wander, M.M., Traina, S.J., Stinner, B.R., and Peters, S.E. 1994. Organic and conventional management effects on biologically active soil organic matter pools. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58:11301139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Coulter, J.A., Sheaffer, C.C., Wyse, D.L., Haar, M.J., Porter, P.M., Quiring, S.R., and Klossner, L.D. 2011. Agronomic performance of cropping systems with contrasting crop rotations and external inputs. Agronomy Journal 103:182192.Google Scholar
33Porter, P.M., Huggins, D.R., Perillo, C.A., Quiring, S.R., and Crookston, R.K. 2003. Organic and other management strategies with two- and four-year crop rotations in Minnesota. Agronomy Journal 95:233244.Google Scholar
34Mahoney, P.R., Olson, K.D., Porter, P.M., Huggins, D.R., Perillo, C.A., and Crookston, R.K. 2004. Profitability of organic cropping systems in southwestern Minnesota. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:3546.Google Scholar
35Delbridge, T.A., Coulter, J.A., King, R.P., Sheaffer, C.C., and Wyse, D.L. 2011. Economic performance of long-term organic and conventional cropping systems in Minnesota. Agronomy Journal 103:13721382.Google Scholar
36Delate, K., Duffy, M., Chase, C., Holste, A., Friedrich, H., and Wantate, N. 2003. An economic comparison of organic and conventional grain crops in a long-term agroecological research (LTAR) site in Iowa. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18:5969.Google Scholar
37Delate, K. and Cambardella, C.A. 2004. Agroecosystem performance during transition to certified organic grain production. Agronomy Journal 96:12881298.Google Scholar
38Archer, D.W. and Kludze, H. 2006. Transition to organic cropping systems under risk. In Proceedings of the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting., Long Beach, CA, USA. p. 124.Google Scholar
39Archer, D.W., Jaradat, A.A., Johnson, J.M.-F., Weyers, S.L., Gesch, R.W., Forcella, F., and Kludze, H.K. 2007. Crop productivity and economics during the transition to alternative cropping systems. Agronomy Journal 99:15381547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Balfour, E. 1943. The Living Soil. Faber, London.Google Scholar
41Reganold, J.P. 1988. Comparison of soil properties as influenced by organic and conventional farming systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 3:144155.Google Scholar
42Clark, M.S., Horwath, W.R., Shennan, C., and Scow, K.M. 1998. Changes in soil chemical properties resulting from organic and low-input farming practices. Agronomy Journal 90:662671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Liebig, M.A. and Doran, J.W. 1999. Impact of organic production practices on soil quality indicators. Journal of Environmental Quality 28:16011609.Google Scholar
44Drinkwater, L.E., Wagoner, P., and Sarrantonio, M. 1998. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396:262264.Google Scholar
45Marriott, E.E. and Wander, M.M. 2006. Total and labile soil organic matter in organic and conventional farming systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 70:950959.Google Scholar
46Leifeld, J., Reiser, R., and Oberholzer, H.-R. 2009. Consequences of conventional versus organic farming on soil carbon: Results from a 27-year field experiment. Agronomy Journal 101:12041218.Google Scholar
47Horowitz, J., Ebel, R., and Ueda, K. 2010. No-till Farming is a Growing Practice. Economic Information Bulletin No. 70. USDA-ERS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
48Eve, M.D., Sperow, M., Paustian, K., and Follett, R.F. 2002. National-scale estimation of changes in soil carbonstocks on agricultural lands. Environmental Pollution 116:431438.Google Scholar
49Franzluebbers, A.J. 2005. Soil organic carbon sequestration and agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in the southeastern USA. Soil and Tillage Research 83:120147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
50Johnson, J.M.F., Reicosky, D.C., Allmaras, R.R., Sauer, T.J., Venterea, R.T., and Dell, C.J. 2005. Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agriculture in the central USA. Soil and Tillage Research 83:7394.Google Scholar
51Grandy, S.A., Robertson, G.P., and Thelen, K.D. 2006. Do productivity and environmental trade-offs justify periodically cultivating no-till cropping systems? Agronomy Journal 98:13771383.Google Scholar
52Spargo, J.S., Alley, M.M., Follett, R.F., and Wallace, J.V. 2008. Soil carbon sequestration with continuous no-till management of grain cropping systems in the Virginia Coastal Plain. Soil Tillage Research 100:133144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53Doran, J.W., Sarrantonio, M., and Liebig, M.A. 1996. Soil health and sustainability. In Sparks, D.L. (ed.). Advances in Agronomy, Vol. 56. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA. p. 154.Google Scholar
54Reganold, J.P., Palmer, A.S., Lockhart, J.C., and Macgregor, A.N. 1993. Soil quality and financial performance of biodynamic and conventional farms in New Zealand. Science 260:344349.Google Scholar
55Drinkwater, L.E., Letourneau, D.K., Workneh, F., van Bruggen, A.H.C., and Shennan, C. 1995. Fundamental differences between conventional and organic tomato agroecosystems in California. Ecological Applications 5:10981112.Google Scholar
56Robertson, G.P. and Grace, P.R. 2004. Greenhouse gas fluxes in tropical and temperate agriculture: The need for full-cost accounting of global warming potential. Environment, Development and Sustainability 6:5163.Google Scholar
57US Environmental Protection Agency. 2011. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2009. USEPA, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
58Auerswald, K., Kainz, M., and Fiener, P. 2003. Soil erosion potential of organic versus conventional farming evaluated by USLE modeling of cropping statistics for agricultural districts in Bavaria. Soil Use and Management 19:305311.Google Scholar
59Papadopoulos, A., Bird, N.R.A., Whitmore, A.P., and Mooney, S.J. 2009. Investigating the effects of organic and conventional management on soil aggregate stability using X-ray computed tomography. European Journal of Soil Science 60:360368.Google Scholar
60Siegrist, S., Schaub, D., Pfiffner, L., and Mader, P. 1998. Does organic agriculture reduce soil erodibility? The results of a long-term field study on loess in Switzerland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 69:253264.Google Scholar
61Kuhn, N.J., Armstrong, E.K., Ling, A.C., Connolly, K.L., and Heckrath, G. 2012. Interrill erosion of carbon and phosphorus from conventionally and organically farmed Devon silt soils. Catena 91:94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62Reganold, J.P., Elliott, L.F., and Unger, Y.L. 1987. Long-term effects of organic and conventional farming on soil erosion. Nature 330:370372.Google Scholar
63Flanagan, D.D. and Nearing, M.A. (eds). 1995. USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hill-slope profile and watershed model documentation. NSERL Report #10, USDA-ARS National Soil Erosion Laboratory, West Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
64Lotter, D.W. 2003. Organic agriculture. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 21:59128.Google Scholar
65Badgley, C., Moghtader, J., Quintero, E., Zakem, E., Chappell, M.J., Aviles-Vazquez, K., Samulon, A., and Perfecto, I. 2007. Organic agriculture and the global food supply. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 22:86108.Google Scholar
66Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N., and Foley, J.A. 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485:229232.Google Scholar
67Berry, P.M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Philipps, L., Hatch, D.J., Cuttle, S.P., Rayns, F.W., and Gosling, P. 2002. Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use and Management 18:248255.Google Scholar
68Mirsky, S.B., Ryan, M.R., Curran, W.S., Teasdale, J.R., Maul, J.E., Spargo, J.T., Moyer, J., Grantham, A.M., Weber, D., and Way, T.R. 2012. Cover crop-based organic rotational no-till grain production in the mid-Atlantic region. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:3140.Google Scholar
69Ryan, M.R., Mortensen, D.A., Wilson, D.O., and Hepperly, P.R. 2008. Organic weed management: What farmers think. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 62:17.Google Scholar
70Benson, F. 2009. Organic Grain Shortage. Organic Dairy News. Available at Web site www.organic.cornell.edu/organicdairy/News.html (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
71Dimitri, C. and Oberholtzer, L. 2009. Marketing US Organic Foods: Recent Trends from Farms to Consumers. Economic Information Bulletin Number 58. USDA-ERS, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
72US Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service. 2010. Organic Production Data Sets. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/organic/ (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
73Mainville, D., Farrell, M., Groover, G., and Mundy, K. 2007. Organic Feed-grain Markets: Consideration for Potential Virginia Producers. Virginia Cooperative Extension Publication, Blacksburg, VA. p. 448520.Google Scholar
74Clark, S., Klonsky, K., Livingston, P., and Temple, S. 1999. Crop yield and economic comparisons of organic, low-input, and conventional farming systems in California's Sacramento Valley. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 14:109121.Google Scholar
75Hanson, J.C. and Musser, W.N. 2003. An economic evaluation of an organic grain rotation with regards to profit and risk. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Working Paper 03–10, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
76Smith, E.G., Clapperton, M.J., and Blackshaw, R.E. 2004. Profitability and risk of organic production systems in the northern Great Plains. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19:152158.Google Scholar
77Chavas, J.-P., Posner, J.L., and Hedtke, J.L. 2009. Organic and conventional production systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: II. Economic and risk analysis 1993–2006. Agronomy Journal 101:288295.Google Scholar
78Minnesota Department of Agriculture. 2011. Organic farm performance in Minnesota. Available at Web site http://www.mda.state.mn.us (accessed January 3, 2013).Google Scholar
79Schmidt, H., Schulz, F., and Leithold, G. 2006. Organic farming trial Gladbacherof. Effects of different crop rotations and tillage systems. In Raupp, J., Pekrun, C., Oltmanns, M., and Kopke, U. (eds). Long-Term Field Experiments in Organic Farming. ISOFAR Scientific Series, Berlin. p. 165182.Google Scholar
80Singer, J.W., Franzluebbers, A.J., and Karlen, D.L. 2009. Grass-based farming systems: Soil conservation and environmental quality. In Wedin, W.F. and Fales, S.L. (eds). Grassland: Quietness and Strength for a New American Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. p. 121136.Google Scholar
81Cavigelli, M.A. and Parkin, T.B. 2012. Cropland management contributions to greenhouse gas flux: Central and Eastern U.S. In Liebig, M., Franzluebbers, A., and Follett, R. (eds). Managing Agricultural Greenhouse Gases: Coordinated Agricultural Research through GRACEnet to Address Our Changing Climate. Academic Press, London. p. 177233.Google Scholar
82Russelle, M.P., Entz, M.H., and Franzluebbers, A.J. 2007. Reconsidering integrated crop–livestock systems in North America. Agronomy Journal 99:325334.Google Scholar
83Watson, C.A., Walker, R.L., and Stockdale, E.A. 2007. Research in organic production systems—past, present and future. Journal of Agricultural Science 146:119.Google Scholar
84Watson, C.A., Bengtsson, H., Ebbesvik, M., Loes, A.-K., Myrbeck, A., Salomon, E., Schroder, J., and Stockdale, E.A. 2002. A review of farm-scale nutrient budgets for organic farms as a tool for management of soil fertility. Soil Use and Management 18:264273.Google Scholar
85Heckman, J.R., Sims, J.T., Beegle, D.B., Coale, F.J., Herbert, S.J., Bruulsema, T.W., and Bamka, W.J. 2003. Nutrient removal by corn grain harvest. Agronomy Journal 95:587591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
86Preusch, P.L., Adler, P.R., Sikora, L.J., and Tworkoski, T.J. 2002. Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in composted and uncomposted poultry litter. Journal of Environmental Quality 31:20512057.Google Scholar
87Spargo, J.T., Evanylo, G.K., and Alley, M.M. 2006. Repeated compost application effects on phosphorus runoff in the Virginia piedmont. Journal of Environmental Quality 35:23422351.Google Scholar
88Sharpley, A.N., Meisinger, J.J., Breeuwsma, A., Sims, T., Daniel, T.C., and Schepers, J.S. 1998. Impact of animal manure management on ground and surface water quality. In Hatfield, J. (ed.). Effective Management of Animal Waste as a Soil Resource. Ann Arbor Press, Chelsea, MI. p. 173242.Google Scholar
89Sims, J.T., Simard, R.R., and Joern, B.C. 1998. Phosphorus loss in agricultural drainage: Historical perspective and current research. Journal of Environmental Quality 27:277293.Google Scholar
90Crews, T.E. and Peoples, M.B. 2004. Legume versus fertilizer sources of nitrogen: ecological tradeoffs and human needs. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 102:279297.Google Scholar
91Franzluebbers, A.J. 2002. Water infiltration and soil structure related to organic matter and its stratification with depth. Soil and Tillage Research 66:197205.Google Scholar
92Pesant, A.R., Dionne, J.L., and Genest, J. 1987. Soil and nutrient losses in surface runoff from conventional and no-till corn systems. Canadian Journal of Soil Science 67:835843.Google Scholar
93Parsch, L.D., Keisling, T.C., Sauer, P.A., Oliver, L.R., and Crabtree, N.S. 2001. Economic analysis of conservation and conventional tillage cropping systems on clayey soil in eastern Arkansas. Agronomy Journal 93:12961304.Google Scholar
94Young, B.G. 2006. Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technology 20:301307.Google Scholar
95Smith, A.N., Reberg-Horton, C., Place, G.T., Meijer, A.D., Arellano, C., and Mueller, J.P. 2011. Rolled rye mulch for weed suppression in organic no-tillage soybeans. Weed Science 59:224231.Google Scholar
96Peigne, J., Ball, B.C., Roger-Estrade, J., and David, C. 2007. Is conservation tillage suitable for organic farming? A review. Soil Use and Management 23:129144.Google Scholar
97Ryan, M.R., Mortensen, D.A., Seidel, R., Smith, R.G., and Grantham, A.M. 2009. Weed community response to no-tillage practices in organic and conventional corn. Proceedings of the Northeastern Weed Science Society 63:94.Google Scholar
98Organic Farming Research Foundation. 1998. Final Results of the Third Biennial National Organic Farmers’ Survey. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
99Francis, K. 2002. Farm Based Education: On Farm Research and Education Research Input Survey. Pennsylvania Association of Sustainable Agriculture, Milheim, PA.Google Scholar
100Organic Farming Research Foundation. 2004. Final Results of the Fourth National Organic Farmers' Survey: Sustaining Organic Farms in a Changing Organic Marketplace. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
101Sooby, J., Landeck, J., and Lipson, M. 2007. 2007 National Organic Research Agenda. Organic Farming Research Foundation, Santa Cruz, CA.Google Scholar
102Luna, J.M., Mitchell, J., and Shrestha, A. 2012. Conservation tillage for organic agriculture: Evolution toward a hybrid system. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:2130.Google Scholar
103Mader, P. and Berner, A. 2012. Development of reduced tillage systems in organic farming in Europe. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:711.Google Scholar
104Shirtliffe, S.J. and Johnson, E.N. 2012. Progress towards no-till organic weed control in western Canada. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:6067.Google Scholar
105Gadermaier, F., Berner, A., Fliessbach, A., Friedel, J.K., and Mader, P. 2012. Impact of reduced tillage on soil organic carbon and nutrient budgets under organic farming. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:6880.Google Scholar
106Teasdale, J.R. and Mohler, C.L. 2000. The quantitative relationship between weed emergence and the physical properties of mulches. Weed Science 48:385392.Google Scholar
107Decker, A.M., Clark, A.J., Meisinger, J.J., Mulford, F.R., and McIntosh, M.S. 1994. Legume cover crop contributions to no-tillage corn production. Agronomy Journal 86:126135.Google Scholar
108Langdale, G.W., Blevins, R.L., Karlen, D.L., McCool, D.K., Nearing, M.A., Skidmore, E.L., Thomas, A.W., Tyler, D.D., and Williams, J.R. 1991. Cover crop effects on soil erosion by wind and water. In Hargrove, W.L. (ed.). Cover Crops for Clean Water. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, IA. p. 1522.Google Scholar
109Munawar, A., Blevins, R.L., Frye, W.W., and Saul, M.R. 1990. Tillage and cover crop management for soil water conservation. Agronomy Journal 82:773777.Google Scholar
110Pullaro, T.C., Marino, P.C., Jackson, D.M., Harrison, H.F., and Keinath, A.P. 2006. Effects of killed cover crop mulch on weeds, weed seeds, and herbivores. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 115:97104.Google Scholar
111Snapp, S.S., Swinton, S.M., Labarta, R., Mutch, D., Black, J.R., Leep, R., Nyiraneza, J., and O'Neil, K. 2005. Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs and performance within cropping system niches. Agronomy Journal 97:322332.Google Scholar
112Delate, K., Cwach, D., and Chase, C. 2012. Organic no-tillage system effects on soybean, corn and irrigated tomato production and economic performance in Iowa, USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:4959.Google Scholar
113Reberg-Horton, C., Grossman, J.M., Kornecki, T.S., Meijer, A.D., Price, A.J., Place, G.T., and Webster, T.M. 2012. Utilizing cover crop mulches to reduce tillage in organic systems in the Southeastern USA. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 27:4148.Google Scholar
114Davis, A.S. 2010. Cover-crop roller-crimper contributes to weed management in no-till soybean. Weed Science 58:300309.Google Scholar
115Mischler, R.A., Curran, W.S., Duiker, S.W., and Hyde, J.A. 2010. Use of a rolled-rye cover crop for suppression in no-till soybeans. Weed Technology 24:253261.Google Scholar
116Ryan, M.R., Mirsky, S.B., Mortensen, D.A., Teasdale, J.R., and Curran, W.S. 2011. Potential synergistic effects of cereal rye biomass and soybean planting density on weed suppression. Weed Science 59:238246.Google Scholar
117Bernstein, E.R., Posner, J.L., Stoltenberg, D.E., and Hedtcke, J.L. 2011. Organically managed no-tillage rye-soybean systems: agronomic, economic, and environmental assessment. Agronomy Journal 103:11691179.Google Scholar
118Teasdale, J.R. and Abdul-Baki, A.A. 1998. Comparison of mixtures vs. monocultures of cover crops for fresh-market tomato production with and without herbicide. Hortscience 33:11631166.Google Scholar
119Clark, A.J., Decker, A.M., Meisinger, J.J., and McIntosh, M.S. 1997. Kill date of vetch, rye, and a vetch–rye mixture. 1. Cover crop and corn nitrogen. Agronomy Journal 89:427434.Google Scholar
120Rosecrance, R.C., McCarty, G.W., Shelton, D.R., and Teasdale, J.R. 2000. Denitrification and N mineralization from hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth) and rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop monocultures and bicultures. Plant and Soil 227:283290.Google Scholar
121Wagger, M.G., Carbera, M.L., and Ranells, N.N. 1989. Nitrogen and carbon cycling in relation to cover crop residue quality. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 53:214218.Google Scholar
122Clark, A.J. (ed.). 2007. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. 3rd ed.Sustainable Agriculture Network, Beltsville, MD.Google Scholar
123Francis, C. (ed.). 2009. Organic Farming: The Ecological System. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
124Lammerts van Bueren, E.T. and Myers, J.R. 2012. Organic Crop Breeding. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
125Maul, J., Mirsky, S., Emche, S., and Devine, T. 2011. Evaluating a germplasm collection of the cover crop hairy vetch for use in sustainable farming systems. Crop Science 51:26152625.Google Scholar
126Baysal, F., Benitez, M.-S., Kleinhenz, M.D., Miller, S.A., and McSpadden Gardener, B.B. 2008. Effects of farm organic transition on soilborne disease suppression. Phytopathology 98:562570.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cavigelli Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Cavigelli Supplementary Material(File)
File 9.7 MB