Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T16:27:44.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rudjer Bošković Institute Radiocarbon Measurements XI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Dušan Srdoč
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, P O Box 1016, 41001 Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Bogomil Obelić
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, P O Box 1016, 41001 Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Nada Horvatinčić
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, P O Box 1016, 41001 Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Ines Krajcar Bronić
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, P O Box 1016, 41001 Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Adela Sliepčević
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, P O Box 1016, 41001 Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This is a list of radiocarbon analyses determined since our previous list (R, 1987, v 29, no. 1, p 135–147). As before, with the exception of speleothems and groundwaters, the calculations follow conventional radiocarbon protocol (Stuiver & Polach, 1977). Sample pretreatment, combustion and counting techniques are essentially the same as described in R, 1971, v 13, no. 1, p 135–140, supplemented by new techniques for groundwater processing (R, 1979, v 21, no. 1, p 131–137). Speleothem and groundwater model ages (given in the comment section of each listing) are based on an initial activity of 85 ± 10 percent modern carbon (pMC), as recommended in Srdoč et al (1986), without adjustment for δ13C. These model ages can be converted from the 5570-yr half-life to the chronometrically more correct half-life of 5730 yr by multiplying by the factor 1.029. The “± figures” on these model ages are statistical combinations of the 1σ counting uncertainty and the ± 10% uncertainty in the assumed 85 pMC. Ages and “± figures” of all other samples are adjusted for stable isotope fractionation according to the recommendations in Stuiver and Polach (1977). Data processing is done by computer (Obelić & Planinić, 1977; Obelić, 1980). Sample descriptions are prepared in collaboration with collectors and submitters.

Type
Date Lists
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Culiberg, M, 1986, Palynological investigations of two peat-bogs, Lovrenško and Ribniško barje from the Pohorje Mts: Biol Vestn, v 34, p 114.Google Scholar
Djerković, B, 1976, Podzemni karstni oblici kao prirodni rezervoari termalne vode: Geol glasnik, v 21, p 231238.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M, 1980, The Kurgan Wave 2 (c 3400–3200 bc) into Europe and the following transformation of culture: Jour Indo-European Studies, v 8, nos. 3–4, p 273315.Google Scholar
Horvatinčić, N, Obelić, B, Srdoč, D, Durman, A, Benkö, L and Sliepčević, A, in press, Radiocarbon and TL dating of the Eneolithic site Vučedol in East Croatia, Yugoslavia: Pact.Google Scholar
Krivic, K, 1985, Los tudi na Soriški planini: Loški razgledi, v 32, p 9397.Google Scholar
Obelić, B, 1980, Computer analysis and interpretation of radiocarbon data: Fizika, v 12, supp 2, p 139161.Google Scholar
Obelić, B and Planinić, J, 1977, Computer processing of radiocarbon and tritium data, in Povinec, P and Usačev, S, eds, Internatl conf on low-radioactivity measurement and applications, Proc: The High Tatras, Slovenske pedagogicke nakladatelstvo, Bratislava, p 117120.Google Scholar
Srdoč, D, Breyer, B and Sliepčević, A, 1971, Rudjer Bošković Institute radiocarbon measurements I: Radiocarbon, v 13, no. 1, p 135140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srdoč, D and Horvatinčić, N, 1986, Radiocarbon dating of Liber linteus Zagrabiensis: Vjesnik Arheol muz Zagreb, ser 3, v XIX, p 8398.Google Scholar
Srdoč, D and Horvatinčić, N, in press, Radiocarbon dating of an Etruscan linen book: Pact.Google Scholar
Srdoč, D, Bronič, I Krajcar, Horvatinčić, N and Obelić, B, 1986, Increase of 14C activity of dissolved inorganic carbon along a river course, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2A, p 515521.Google Scholar
Srdoč, D, Obelić, B, Horvatinčić, N, Krajcar, I and Sliepčević, A, 1984, Rudjer Bošković Institute radiocarbon measurements VIII: Radiocarbon, v 26, no. 3, p 449460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srdoč, D, Obelić, B, Sliepčević, A, Bronič, I Krajcar and Horvatinčić, N, 1987, Rudjer Bošković Institute radiocarbon measurements X: Radiocarbon, v 29, no. 1, p 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srdoč, D, Sliepčević, A, Obelić, B and Horvatinčić, N, 1979, Rudjer Bošković Institute radiocarbon measurements V: Radiocarbon, v 21, no. 1, p 131137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, and Polach, H A, 1977, Discussion: Reporting of 14C data: Radiocarbon, v 19, no. 3, p 355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šercelj, A, 1965, Paleofloristic research in the Triglav mountains: Razprave SAZU, v VIII, p 473498.Google Scholar