Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:22:51.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deciding on the Data: Epistemological Problems Surrounding Instruments and Research Techniques in Cell Biology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2022

William Bechtel
William Bechtel*
Affiliation:
Washington University in St. Louis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The primary focus of philosophy of science in this century has been on theories and theoretical knowledge. Except for concern about whether phenomenal reports or reports of objects and events should count as data reports and whether data might be theory-laden and what consequences that might have for objectivity of science, data have been taken to be relatively unproblematic. But for scientists, questions about what are the data are often of paramount concern. Such controversies often overshadow controversies over theories or explanatory models. Scientists’ questions about data, moreover, do not turn on the philosophical questions just identified. Instead, for scientists, the overriding question is whether purported data is actually informative about the phenomenon in nature under investigation or whether it represents an artifact; that is, whether it was so much the product of the procedures used to generate the data that it could not be interpreted as providing information about the underlying phenomenon.

Type
Part VI. Search Heuristics, Experimentation, and Technology in Molecular and Cell Biology
Information
PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association , Volume 1994 , Issue 2: Volume Two: Symposia and Invited Papers 1994 , 1994 , pp. 166 - 178
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by the Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Support for this research was provided by the National Endowment for the Humanities (RH-21013-91), and is gratefully acknowledged.

References

Bechtel, W. (1993), “Integrating Sciences by Creating New Disciplines: The Case of Cell Biology”, Biology and Philosophy, 8: 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, L.G.E. (1952), “The Application of Freezing and Drying Techniques in Cytology”, International Review of Cytology 1: 35–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensley, R.R. (1951), “Facts versus Artifacts in Cytology: The Golgi Apparatus”, Experimental Cell Research 2: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretschneider, L.H. (1952), “The Electron-microscopic Investigation of Tissue Sections”, International Review of Cytology 1: 305–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cosslett, V.E. (1955), “Electron Microscopy”, in Oster, G. and Pollister, A. W., (ed.), Physical Techniques in Biological Research, Vol. 1, Part A. Optical Techniques. New York: Academic. pp. 461–531.Google Scholar
Cosslett, V.E. (1971), “Electron Microscopy”, in Oster, G., (ed.), Physical Techniques in Biological Research, Vol. 1, Part A. Optical Techniques. New York: Academic, pp. 71–156.Google Scholar
Dalton, A.J. (1953), “Electron Microscopy of Tissue Sections”, International Review of Cytology 2: 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Morán, H. (1952), “The Submicroscopic Organization of Vertebrate Nerve Fibres: An electron Microscope Study of Myelinated and Unmyelinated Nerve Fibres”, Experimental Cell Research 3: 282–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D.E., Loomis, W.F., and Auerbach, V.H. (1948), “Studies on the Cyclophorase System I.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 172: 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. and Hartree, E.F. (1949), “Activity of the Succinic Dehydrogenase-cytochrome System in Different Tissue Preparation”, Biochemical Journal 44: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lehninger, A.L. (1951), “The Organized Respiratory Activity of Isolated Rat-liver Mitochondria”, in Edsall, J., (ed.), Enzymes and Enzyme Systems. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Marton, L. (1968), Early History of the Electron Microscope. San Francisco: San Francisco Press.Google Scholar
Mercer, E.H. and Birbeck, M.S.C. (1972), Electron microscopy: A Handbook for Biologists. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1942), Biochemistry and Morphogenesis. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palade, G.E. (1952). “The Fine Structure of Mitochondria”, Anatomical Record 114, 427–451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palade, G.E. (1952), “A Study of Fixation for Electron Microscopy”, Journal of Experimental Medicine 9: 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palade, G.E. (1953), “A Small Particulate Component of Cytoplasm,” Journal of Applied Physics 24: 1419.Google Scholar
Palade, G. E. and Claude, A. (1949a), “The Nature of the Golgi Apparatus. I. Parallelism between Intercellular Myelin Figures and Golgi Apparatus in Somatic Cells,” Journal of Morphology 85: 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palade, G. E. and Claude, A. (1949b), “The Nature of the Golgi Apparatus. II. Identification of the Golgi Apparatus with a Complex of Myelin Figures”, Journal of Morphology 85: 71–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palade, G.E. and Porter, K.R. (1954), “Studies on Endoplasmic Reticulum”, Journal of Experimental Medicine 100: 641–655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palade, G.E. and Siekevitz, P. (1955), “Liver Microsomes: An Integrated Morphological and Biochemical Study,” Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology 2: 171–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, K.R. (1954), “Electron Microscopy of Basophilic Components of Cytoplasm,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 2: 346–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, K.R. (1987), “Electron Microscopy of Cultured Cells”, in Pauly, J. E., (ed.), The American Association of Anatomists, 1888-1987. Essays on the History of Anatomy in America and a Report on the Membership—Past and Present. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. pp. 59–67.Google Scholar
Porter, K.R. and Blum, J. (1953), “A study in Microtomy for electron Microscopy”, The Anatomical Record 117: 685–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, KR., Claude, A. and Fullam, E (1945), “A Study of Tissue Culture Cells by Electron Microscopy”, Journal of Experimental Medicine 81: 233–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Porter, K.R. and Kallman, F.L. (1952), “Significance of Cell Particulates as seen by Electron Microscopy,” Annuals of the New York Academy of Science 54: 882–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, J.D. (1987), “The Early Days of Electron Microscopy of Nerve Tissues and Membranes,” International Review of Cytology 100: 129–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjöstrand, F.S. (1953), “Electron Microscopy of Mitochondria and Cytoplasmic Double Membranes”, Nature 171: 30–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sjöstrand, F.S. (1956a), “Electron Microscopy of Cells and Tissues”, in Oster, G. and Pollister, A.W., (ed.), Physical techniques in biological research. New York: Academic. pp. 241–298.Google Scholar
Sjöstrand, F.S. (1956b), “The Ultrastructure of Cells as Revealed by the Electron Microscope”, International Review of Cytology 5: 455–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, R.C. and Wyckoff, R.W.G. (1944), “The Thickness of Electron Microscopic Objects”, Journal of Applied Physics 15: 712–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyckoff, R.W.G. (1959), “Optical Methods in Cytology”, in βBrachet, J. and Mirsky, A.E., (eds.), The Cell: Biochemistry, Physiology, Morphology. New York: Academic Press, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W.C. (1981), “Robustness, Reliability, and Overdetermination”, in Brewer, M.B. and Collins, B.E. (eds.), Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 124–163.Google Scholar
Warburg, O. (1913), “Über sauerstoffatmende Kornchen aus Leberzellen und Über Sauer- stoffatmung in Berkfeld-Filtraten wässeriger Leberextrakte”, Pflügers Archiv für die gesamte Physiologie des Menschen und der Tierre 154: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar