Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T17:58:42.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Implicit Political Knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2013

Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz
Aleksander Ksiazkiewicz*
Affiliation:
Rice University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Political knowledge today is studied primarily at the explicit level. Measures of political knowledge often rely on testing whether voters are aware of various “facts” about political life, such as the names and offices of prominent political actors, the institutional structures of the political system, and the ideological or policy differences between the major political parties (e.g., Delli Carpini and Keeter 1996). These various kinds of political information are considered to be important by political scientists and other social scientists because they facilitate the informed voting decisions that are needed to hold elected leaders accountable (e.g., Lau and Redlawsk 2006; Pande 2011).

Type
Symposium: Implicit Attitudes in Political Science Research
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 46 , Issue 3 , July 2013 , pp. 553 - 555
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beaman, Lori, Chattopadhyay, Raghabendra, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topalova, Petia. 2009. “Powerful Women: Does Exposure Reduce Bias?” Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (4): 1497–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Ryan L., and Highton, Benjamin. 2009. “Policy Polarization among Party Elites and the Significance of Political Awareness in the Mass Public.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (3): 538–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 2006. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics (1964).” Critical Review 18 (1-3): 1–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Correll, Joshua, Park, Bernadette, Judd, Charles M., and Wittenbrink, Bernd. 2002. “The Police Officer's Dilemma: Using Ethnicity to Disambiguate Potentially Threatening Individuals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (6): 1314–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correll, Joshua, Park, Bernadette, Judd, Charles M., Wittenbrink, Bernd, Sadler, Melody S., and Keesee, Tracie. 2007. “Across the Thin Blue Line: Police Officers and Racial Bias in the Decision to Shoot.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 92 (6): 1006–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, Katinka, Eerland, Anita, Zijlmans, Josjan, and Post, Lysanne. 2012. “How Body Balance Influences Political Party Evaluations: A Wii Balance Board Study.” Frontiers in Psychology 3 (536): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eberhardt, Jennifer L., Goff, Phillip Atiba, Purdie, Valerie J., and Davies, Paul G.. 2004. “Seeing Black: Race, Crime, and Visual Processing.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6): 876–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friese, Malte, Smith, Colin Tucker, Plischke, Thomas, Bluemke, Matthias, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2012. “Do Implicit Attitudes Predict Actual Voting Behavior Particularly for Undecided Voters?” PLoS ONE 7 (8).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gawronski, Bertram, and Bodenhausen, Galen V.. 2006. “Associative and Propositional Processes in Evaluation: An Integrative Review of Implicit and Explicit Attitude Change.” Psychological Bulletin 132 (5): 692–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, Jack, and Knowles, Eric D.. 2008. “Implicit Motivation to Control Prejudice.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (1): 16472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goff, Phillip Atiba, Eberhardt, Jennifer L., Williams, Melissa J., and Jackson, Matthew Christian. 2008. “Not Yet Human: Implicit Knowledge, Historical Dehumanization, and Contemporary Consequences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 94 (2): 292–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Greenwald, Anthony G., Poehlman, T. Andrew, Uhlmann, Eric Luis, and Banaji, Mahzarin R.. 2009. “Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: Iii. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 (1): 17–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, Carlee Beth, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2012. “Motivated Independence? Implicit Party Identity Predicts Political Judgments among Self-Proclaimed Independents.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38: 1441–455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, Danny. 2005. “Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 908–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, Danny. 2011. “When Gender and Party Collide: Stereotyping in Candidate Trait Attribution.” Politics & Gender 7 (2): 133–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jost, John T., Rudman, Laurie A., Blair, Irene V., Carney, Dana R., Dasgupta, Nilanjana, Glaser, Jack, and Hardin, Curtis D.. 2009. “The Existence of Implicit Bias Is Beyond Reasonable Doubt: A Refutation of Ideological and Methodological Objections and Executive Summary of Ten Studies That No Manager Should Ignore.” Research in Organizational Behavior 29 (0): 39–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander. 2012. “Sophistication without Introspection: Voters May Know More Than They Know.” In Midwest Political Science Association Conference, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Ksiazkiewicz, Aleksander, and Hedrick, James. 2013. “An Introduction to Implicit Attitudes in Political Science Research.” PS: Political Science and Politics 46 (3): this issue.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, Milton, and Hamill, Ruth. 1986. “A Partisan Schema for Political Information Processing.” American Political Science Review 80 (2): 505–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luskin, Robert C. 1987. “Measuring Political Sophistication.” American Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 856–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nosek, Brian A., Banaji, Mahzarin R., and Greenwald, Anthony G.. 2002. “Math = Male, Me = Female, Therefore Math ≠ Me.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (1): 44–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oppenheimer, Daniel, and Trail, Thomas. 2010. “Why Leaning to the Left Makes You Lean to the Left: Effect of Spatial Orientation on Political Attitudes.” Social Cognition 28 (5): 651–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pande, Rohini. 2011. “Can Informed Voters Enforce Better Governance? Experiments in Low-Income Democracies.” Annual Review of Economics 3 (1): 215–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Markus, and Lupia, Arthur. 2008. “Money, Time, and Political Knowledge: Distinguishing Quick Recall and Political Learning Skills.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, W.M. 1993. “The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing About Political Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 472–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M., and Cramer, Katherine J.. 1996. “Activation and Application of Political Party Stereotypes: The Role of Television.” Political Communication 13 (2): 195–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudman, Laurie A., and Kilianski, Stephen E.. 2000. “Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward Female Authority.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26 (11): 1315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Elk, Michiel, van Schie, Hein T., and Bekkering, Harold. 2010. “From Left to Right: Processing Acronyms Referring to Names of Political Parties Activates Spatial Associations.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (11): 2202–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winter, Nicholas. 2010. “Masculine Republicans and Feminine Democrats: Gender and Americans' Explicit and Implicit Images of the Political Parties.” Political Behavior 32 (4): 587–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar