Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T05:59:47.372Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterisation of correctness of cardinal interpolation with shifted three-directional box splines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2011

Ding-Xuan Zhou
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Duisburg, D-47048 Duisburg, Germany
Kurt Jetter*
Affiliation:
Fachbereich Mathematik, Universität Duisburg, D-47048 Duisburg, Germany
*
Any correspondence concerning the paper should be addressed to Professor Jetter.

Extract

Cardinal interpolation by integer translates of shifted three-directional box splines is studied. It is shown that, for arbitrary orders, k, l, m ∈ N of the directional vectors, this problem is correct if and only if the shift vector is taken from the hexagonal shift region (modulo translation with respect to the lattice Z2). This confirms a conjecture of S. D. Riemenschneider [9], and settles the problem studied in [5] for the special case k = l = m in full generality. The method of proof is from homotopy theory.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Royal Society of Edinburgh 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Binev, P. G. and Jetter, K.. Cardinal interpolation with shifted three-directional box splines. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 122 (1992), 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Boor, C. de, Höllig, K. and Riemenschneider, S. D.. Bivariate cardinal interpolation by splines on a three-directional mesh. Illinois J. Math. 29 (1985), 533–66.Google Scholar
3Chui, C. K.. Multivariate Splines, CBMS-NSF Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics 54 (Philadelphia: SIAM, 1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Chui, C. K., Stöckier, J. and Ward, J. D.. Invertibility of shifted box spline interpolation operators. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 22 (1991), 543–53.Google Scholar
5Chui, C. K., Stöckier, J. and Ward, J. D.. Singularity of cardinal interpolation with shifted box splines. J. Approx. Theory 74 (1993), 123–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Jetter, K.. Multivariate approximation from the cardinal interpolation point of view. In Approximation Theory VII, eds Cheney, E. W., Chui, C. K. and Schumaker, L. L., 131–61 (Boston: Academic Press, 1992).Google Scholar
7Jetter, K., Riemenschneider, S. D. and Sivakumar, N.. Schoenberg's exponential Euler spline curves. Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A 118 (1991), 2133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Munkres, J. R.. Topology: A First Course (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1975).Google Scholar
9Riemenschneider, S. D.. Multivariate cardinal interpolation. In Approximation Theory VI, eds Chui, C. K., Schumaker, L. L. and Ward, J. D., 561–80 (New York: Academic Press, 1989).Google Scholar
10Sivakumar, N.. On bivariate cardinal interpolation by shifted splines on a three-directional mesh. J. Approx. Theory 61 (1990), 178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Spanier, E. H.. Algebraic Topology (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966).Google Scholar
12Stöckier, J.. Cardinal interpolation with translates of shifted bivariate box splines. In Mathematical Methods in Computer Aided Geometric Design, eds Lyche, T. and Schumaker, L. L., 583–92 (Boston: Academic Press, 1989).Google Scholar