Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T22:00:03.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DYNAMO Survey: An Upclose View of Clumpy Galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2015

David Fisher
Affiliation:
Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, P. O. Box 218, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia email: dfisher@swin.edu.au
the DYNAMO Team
Affiliation:
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.437.1070G
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We highlight recent results on the DYNAMO survey of turbulent, clumpy disks galaxies found at z=0.1. Bright star forming DYNAMO galaxies are found to be very similar in properties to star forming galaxies in the high redshift Universe. Typical star formation rates of turbulent DYNAMO galaxies range 10-80 M yr−1. Roughly 2/3 of DYNAMO galaxies have Hα kinematics that are consistent with rotation. The typical gas velocity dispersion of DYNAMO galaxies is σ ~ 20 - 60 km s−1. We show that, when convolved to the same resolution, maps of Hα emission in DYNAMO galaxies have essentially identical morphology as that of z ~ 1 - 3 galaxies. Finally, DYNAMO galaxies have high molecular gas fractions fmol ~ 20 - 35%. We note that DYNAMO galaxies are not dwarfs, typical masses are Mstar ~ 0.8 - 8 × 1010 M. These data are all consistent with a scenario in which despite being at relatively low redshift the DYNAMO galaxies are forming stars similarly to that observed in the high-redshift Universe, that is to say star formation is occurring in very massive (Mclump ~ 109 M), very large (rclump ~ 300 pc) clumps of gas.

Type
Contributed Papers
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2015 

References

Abraham, , et al. 1996, ApJS, 107, 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bassett, , et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 3206Google Scholar
Combes, , et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A41Google Scholar
Elmegreen, B. G., Bournaud, F., & Elmegreen, D. M. 2008, ApJ, 688, 67Google Scholar
Fisher, , et al. 2014, ApJ, 790, L30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genzel, , et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, 75Google Scholar
Genzel, , et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, , et al. 2010, Nature, 467, 684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, P. J., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 437, 1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, , et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1247Google Scholar
Saintonge, , et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinbank, , et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacconi, , et al., 2013, ApJ, 768, 74Google Scholar
Wisnioski, C., et al., 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3339Google Scholar