Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:28:31.928Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bridging the gap between supernovae and their remnants through multi-dimensional hydrodynamic modeling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2017

S. Orlando Open the ORCID record for S. Orlando [Opens in a new window] ,
M. Miceli  and
O. Petruk
S. Orlando
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy
M. Miceli
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy Dip. di Fisica e Chimica, Univ. di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy
O. Petruk
Affiliation:
INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Palermo, Piazza del Parlamento 1, 90134 Palermo, Italy 3Inst. Appl. Probl. in Mechanics and Mathematics, Naukova Street, 3-b Lviv 79060, Ukraine
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Supernova remnants (SNRs) are diffuse extended sources characterized by a complex morphology and a non-uniform distribution of ejecta. Such a morphology reflects pristine structures and features of the progenitor supernova (SN) and the early interaction of the SN blast wave with the inhomogeneous circumstellar medium (CSM). Deciphering the observations of SNRs might open the possibility to investigate the physical properties of both the interacting ejecta and the shocked CSM. This requires accurate numerical models which describe the evolution from the SN explosion to the remnant development and which connect the emission properties of the remnants to the progenitor SNe. Here we show how multi-dimensional SN-SNR hydrodynamic models have been very effective in deciphering observations of SNR Cassiopeia A and SN 1987A, thus unveiling the structure of ejecta in the immediate aftermath of the SN explosion and constraining the 3D pre-supernova structure and geometry of the environment surrounding the progenitor SN.

Keywords

hydrodynamics - instabilities - shock waves - ISM: supernova remnants
Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union , Volume 12 , Symposium S331: Supernova 1987A:30 years later - Cosmic Rays and Nuclei from Supernovae and their aftermaths , February 2017 , pp. 258 - 267
Copyright
Copyright © International Astronomical Union 2017 

References

Badenes, C., Hughes, J. P., Cassam-Chenaï, G., & Bravo, E. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLaney, T. et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, K. A., Zhekov, S. A., Park, S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 829, 40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransson, C., Larsson, J., Migotto, K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, L19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryxell, B. et al. 2000, ApJS, 131, 273 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, U. & Laming, J. M. 2012, ApJ, 746, 130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janka, H.-T., Melson, T., & Summa, A. 2016, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci., 66, 341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kifonidis, K., Plewa, T., Scheck, L., Janka, H.-T., & Müller, E. 2006, A&A, 453, 661 Google Scholar
Lee, J.-J., Park, S., Hughes, J. P., & Slane, P. O. 2014, ApJ, 789, 7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H., McCray, R., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1993, ApJ, 419, 824 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattila, S., Lundqvist, P., Gröningsson, P., et al. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miceli, M., Orlando, S., Reale, F., Bocchino, F., & Peres, G. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milisavljevic, D. & Fesen, R. A. 2013, ApJ, 772, 134 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milisavljevic, D. & Fesen, R. A. 2015, Science, 347, 526 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, T. & Podsiadlowski, P. 2007, Science, 315, 1103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandra, K. et al. 2013, ArXiv e-prints: 1306.2307Google Scholar
Orlando, S., Peres, G., Reale, F., et al. 2005, A&A, 444, 505 Google Scholar
Orlando, S., Bocchino, F., Reale, F., Peres, G., & Pagano, P. 2008, ApJ, 678, 274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlando, S., Bocchino, F., Miceli, M., Petruk, O., & Pumo, M. L. 2012, ApJ, 749, 156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlando, S., Miceli, M., Pumo, M. L., & Bocchino, F. 2015, ApJ, 810, 168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orlando, S., Miceli, M., Pumo, M. L., & Bocchino, F. 2016, ApJ, 822, 22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patnaude, D. J., Lee, S.-H., Slane, P. O., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruk, O., Dubner, G., Castelletti, G., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 1034 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pumo, M. L. & Zampieri, L. 2011, Astrophys. J., 741, 41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Veelen, B., Langer, N., Vink, J., et al. 2009, A&A, 503, 495 Google Scholar
Wang, L. et al. 2002, ApJ, 579, 671 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. & Wheeler, J. C. 2008, ARA&A, 46, 433 Google Scholar
Wongwathanarat, A., Janka, H.-T., Mueller, E., et al., 2016, ArXiv e-prints, 1610.05643Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, H. et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, L27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar