Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:00:14.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of energy source and supplementation pattern on feed intake and microbial-N supply in dual purpose cows (Bos indicus x B. taurus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2017

J. C. Ordóñez Tercero ,
L. Ramírez Avilés ,
C. Aguilar Perez  and
C. A. Sandoval-Castro
J. C. Ordóñez Tercero
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science –, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatan, apdo 4-116, Mérida, Yucatán, 97100, México.
L. Ramírez Avilés
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science –, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatan, apdo 4-116, Mérida, Yucatán, 97100, México.
C. Aguilar Perez
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science –, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatan, apdo 4-116, Mérida, Yucatán, 97100, México.
C. A. Sandoval-Castro*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science –, Universidad Autónoma de Yucatan, apdo 4-116, Mérida, Yucatán, 97100, México.
*
ccastro@tunku.uady.mx
Get access

Extract

The microbial protein synthesis is variable and depend of several of factors, one the most important being the energy sources. Numerous investigations have evaluated individual sugars. However, few quantitative information is available describing the impact of sucrose or its monosacharides (glucose and fructose) and how they compare with other carbohydrate such as starch (Heldt et al., 1999). Chamberlain and Choung (1995) mention that sugar supplementation results in a higher microbial nitrogen supply (MNS) than starch. On the other hand, the amount of nutrients that ruminants can remove from feeds, may be modified by others feeds eaten the same day (Gill and Powell, 1993). Thus, feeding pattern might also affect microbial-N supply (Chamberlain and Choung, 1995). Therefore, the objective of the present work was to compare maize and sugarcane molasses as energy sources as well as the change of feeding pattern (CFP) on DM intake and MNS.

Type
Cattle Nutrition
Information
Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Science , Volume 2003 , 2003 , pp. 120
Copyright
Copyright © The British Society of Animal Science 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chamberlain, D. G. and Choung, J. 1995. The importance of rate of ruminal fermentation of energy sources in diets for dairy cows. Recent advances in animal nutrition, Garnsworthy, P. C., Cole, D. J. A. (eds). Nottingham Univ. Press, UK. Pp. 3–27 Google Scholar
Gill, M and Powell, C. 1993. Prediction of associative effects of mixing feeds. In: Increasing livestock production through utilization of local resources. Tingshuang, G (ed). Proceedings of a workshop held in Beijing, China. Pp. 393–405 Google Scholar
Heldt, J. S., Cochran, R. C., Stokka, G. L., Farmer, C. G., Mathis, C. P., Titgemeyer, E. C., Nagaraja, T. G. 1999. Effects of different supplemental sugars and starch fed in combination with degradable intake protein on low-quality forage used by beef steers. Journal of Animal Science, 77 2793–2802 Google Scholar
Verbic, J., Chen, J. B., McLeod, N. A. Orskov, E. R. 1990, . Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effects of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivate excretion by steers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge. 114: 243–248 Google Scholar