Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Police Officer Response to the Injured Officer: A Survey-Based Analysis of Medical Care Decisions

  • Matthew D. Sztajnkrycer (a1), David W. Callaway (a2) and Amado Alejandro Baez (a3)

Abstract

Introduction:

No widely accepted, specialized medical training exists for police officers confronted with medical emergencies while under conditions of active threat. The purpose of this study was to assess medical decisionmaking capabilities of law enforcement personnel under these circumstances.

Methods:

Web-based surveys were administered to all sworn officers within the county jurisdiction.Thirty-eight key actions were predetermined for nine injured officer scenarios, with each correct action worth one point.Descriptive statistics and t-tests were used to analyze results.

Results:

Ninety-seven officers (65.1% response rate) responded to the survey. The majority of officers (68.0%) were trained to the first-responder level. Overall mean score for the scenarios was 15.5 ±3.6 (range 7–25). A higher level of medical training (EMT-B/P versus first responder) was associated with a higher mean score (16.6 ±3.4, p = 0.05 vs. 15.0 ±3.6, p = 0.05).Tactical unit assignment was associated with a lower score compared with nonassigned officers (13.5 ±2.9 vs. 16.0 ±3.6, p = 0.0085).No difference was noted based upon previous military experience. Ninety-two percent of respondents expressed interest in a law enforcement-oriented advanced first-aid course.

Conclusions:

Tactical medical decision-making capability, as assessed through the nine scenarios, was sub-optimal. In this post 9/11 era, development of law enforcement-specific medical training appears appropriate.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Matthew Sztajnkrycer, MD, PhD Department of Emergency Medicine GEGR-G410Mayo Clinic200 First Street SWRochester MN 55901USA E-mail: sztajnkrycer.matthew@mayo.edu

References

Hide All
1. US Federal Bureau of Investigation, Uniform Crime Reporting Program. Law enforcement officers killed and assaulted 2005. Federal Bureau of Investigation. US Department of Justice. November 2006.
2.Bergeron, JD, Bizjak, G, Krausa, GW, LeBadour, C: Brady First Responder, 7th ed.New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2005.
3. American College of Surgeons: Advanced Trauma Life Support, 7th edition. 2003.
4.Butler, FK, Hagmann, JH: Tactical management of urban warfare casualties in special operations. Mil Med 2000;165(suppl 1):148.
5.Mabry, RL, Holcomb, JB, Baker, AM, Cloonan, CC, Uhorchak, JM, Perkins, DE, Canfield, AJ, Hagmann, JH: United States Army Rangers in Somalia:An analysis of combat casualties on an urban battlefield. J Trauma 2000;49:515529.
6.Butler, FK Jr, Hagman, J, Butler, EG: Tactical combat casualty care in special operations. Mil Med 1996;161(Suppl 1):316.
7.Committee on Tactical Combat Casualty Care: Military Medicine. In: Prehospital Trauma Life Support, Military Edition, Revised 5th ed, McSwain, NE, Frame, S, Salomone, JP (eds). St Louis: Mosby, 2005, pp 374408.
8.Butler, FK Jr : Tactical medicine training for SEAL mission commanders. Mil Med 2001;166:625631.
9.Bellamy, RF: The causes of death in conventional land warfare: Implications for combat casualty care research. Mil Med 1984;149:5562.
10.Champion, HR, Bellamy, RF, Roberts, P, Leppaniemi, A: A profile of combat injury. J Trauma 2003;54:S13–S19.
11.Bellamy, RF: Death on the battlefield and the role of first aid. Mil Med 1987;152:634635.
12.Albrecht, S: Surviving Street Patrol. Bolder: Paladin Press,2001.
13. Anonymous: Combat Lifesaver Program. Department of Combat Medic Training. Available at http://www.cs.amedd.army.mil/clsp/index.htm.Accessed 18 December 2006.
14.Tilghman, A: Iraqi police study the basics of medical aid. Stars and Stripes, 10 April 2006.
15.Arishita, GI, Vayer, JS, Bellamy, RF: Cervical spine immobilization of penetrating neck wounds in a hostile environment. J Trauma 1989;29:332337.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed