Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:53:43.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure as Abstraction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Robin Findlay Hendry
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I argue that structure in chemistry is a creature of abstraction: attending selectively to structural similarities, we neglect differences. There are different ways to abstract, so abstraction is interest dependent. So is structure. First, there are two different and mutually irreducible notions of structure in chemistry: bond structure and geometrical structure. Second, structure is relative to scale (of energy, time, and length): the same substance has different structures at different scales, and relationships of structural sameness and difference vary across the scales. However, these facts have no tendency to undermine structure’s claim to reality, or its metaphysical seriousness.

Type
Chemical Structure
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 83 , Issue 5 , December 2016 , pp. 1070 - 1081
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

I am most grateful to the John Templeton Foundation for funding the Durham Emergence Project, as part of which this article was researched and written.

References

Assmus, Alexi. 1992. “The Molecular Tradition in Early Quantum Theory.” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 22:209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Richard F. W. 1990. Atoms in Molecules: A Quantum Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1992. “Aristotelian Natures and the Modern Experimental Method.” In Inference, Explanation and Other Frustrations: Essays in the Philosophy of Science, ed. Earman, John. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, D., and Kauzmann, W.. 1969. The Structure and Properties of Water. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Brian. 2001. Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Finney, John L. 2004. “Water? What’s So Special about It?” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 359:1145–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, N. N. 1968. Ionic Crystals, Lattice Defects and Nonstoichiometry. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Heil, John. 2003. From an Ontological Point of View. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay. 2008. “Two Conceptions of the Chemical Bond.” Philosophy of Science 75:909–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendry, Robin Findlay 2010. “The Chemical Bond: Structure, Energy and Explanation.” In EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association, ed. Dorato, Mauro, Rèdei, Miklós, and Suárez, Mauricio, 117–27. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Dorato, Mauro, Rèdei, Miklós, and Suárez, Mauricio 2016. “Natural Kinds in Chemistry.” In Chapters in the Philosophy of Chemistry, ed. Fisher, Grant and Scerri, Eric, 253–75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kauffman, George B., and Myers, Robin D.. 1975. “The Resolution of Racemic Acid: A Classic Stereochemical Experiment for an Undergraduate Laboratory.” Journal of Chemical Education 52:777–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khalidi, Muhammad Ali. 1998. “Natural Kinds and Crosscutting Categories.” Journal of Philosophy 95:33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leigh, G. J., Favre, H. A., and Metanomski, W. V.. 1998. Principles of Chemical Nomenclature: A Guide to IUPAC Recommendations. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Lewis, G. N. 1913. “Valence and Tautomerism.” Journal of the American Chemical Society 35:1448–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popelier, Paul 2000. Atoms in Molecules: An Introduction. London: Pearson.Google Scholar
Ramberg, Peter J. 2003. Chemical Structure, Spatial Arrangement: The Early History of Stereochemistry, 1874–1914. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Rocke, Alan J. 1984. Chemical Atomism in the Nineteenth Century: From Dalton to Cannizzaro. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
Rocke, Alan J. 2010. Image and Reality: Kekule, Kopp and the Scientific Imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tobin, Emma. 2010. “Crosscutting Natural Kinds and the Hierarchy Thesis.” In The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds, ed. Beebee, Helen and Sabbarton-Leary, Nigel, 179–91. London: Routledge.Google Scholar