Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:44:36.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kon-Tiki Experiments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Aaron Novick ,
Adrian M. Currie ,
Eden W. McQueen  and
Nathan L. Brouwer
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We identify a species of experiment—Kon-Tiki experiments—used to demonstrate the competence of a cause to produce a certain effect, and we examine their role in the historical sciences. We argue that Kon-Tiki experiments are used to test middle-range theory, to test assumptions within historical narratives, and to open new avenues of inquiry. We show how the results of Kon-Tiki experiments are involved in projective (rather than consequentialist) inferences, and we argue (against Kyle Stanford) that reliance on projective inferences does not provide historical scientists with any special protection against the problem of unconceived alternatives.

Type
Articles
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 87 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 213 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

For comments on drafts and presentations, the authors are grateful to Joseph McCaffrey, Raphael Scholl, Nora Boyd, Joshua Eisenthal, three anonymous reviewers for Philosophy of Science, members of a 2016 seminar at the University of Pittsburgh, and an audience at Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Adrian Currie’s research was funded by a generous grant from the Templeton World Charity Foundation (no. 222637).

References

Bailey, Jake V., Joye, Samantha B., Kalanetra, Karen M., Flood, Beverly E., and Corsetti, Frank A. 2007. “Evidence of Giant Sulphur Bacteria in Neoproterozoic Phosphorites.” Nature 445 (7124): 198–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beatty, John. 1995. “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis.” In Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, ed. Wolters, Gereon and Lennox, James G., 45–81. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Beatty, John. 1997. “Why Do Biologists Argue like They Do?” Philosophy of Science 64 (December): S432–S443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa. 2018. “Using Models to Correct Data: Paleodiversity and the Fossil Record.” Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1820-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, Derek E. G. 1995. “Experimental Taphonomy.” PALAIOS 10 (6): 539–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromham, Lindell. 2016. “Testing Hypotheses in Macroevolution.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 55 (February): 47–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1983. How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Robert, and Wylie, Alison. 2016. Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. 2001. “Historical Science, Experimental Science, and the Scientific Method.” Geology 29 (11): 987–90.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. 2002. “Methodological and Epistemic Differences between Historical Science and Experimental Science.” Philosophy of Science 69 (3): 447–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. 2011. “Prediction and Explanation in Historical Natural Science.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3): 551–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cleland, Carol E. 2013. “Common Cause Explanation and the Search for a Smoking Gun.” In Rethinking the Fabric of Geology, ed. Baker, V., 1–9. Special Papers (Geological Society of America) 502. Boulder, CO: Geological Society of America.Google Scholar
Currie, Adrian M. 2015. “Marsupial Lions and Methodological Omnivory: Function, Success and Reconstruction in Paleobiology.” Biology and Philosophy 30 (2): 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Adrian M. 2017. “Hot-Blooded Gluttons: Dependency, Coherence, and Method in the Historical Sciences.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68 (4): 929–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Adrian M. 2018. Rock, Bone, and Ruin: An Optimist’s Guide to the Historical Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Adrian M., and Levy, Arnon. 2019. “Why Experiments Matter.” Inquiry 62:1066–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, Adrian M., and Sterelny, Kim. 2017. “In Defence of Story-Telling.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 62 (April): 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Eric H., Peterson, Kevin J., and Cameron, R. Andrew. 1995. “Origin of Bilaterian Body Plans: Evolution of Developmental Regulatory Mechanisms.” Science 270 (5240): 1319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donoghue, Philip C. J., Kouchinsky, Artem, Waloszek, Dieter, Bengtson, Stefan, Dong, Xi-ping, Val’kov, Anatoly K., Cunningham, John A., and Repetski, John E. 2006. “Fossilized Embryos Are Widespread but the Record Is Temporally and Taxonomically Biased.” Evolution and Development 8 (2): 232–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, Douglas H., and Valentine, James W. 2013. The Cambrian Explosion: The Construction of Animal Biodiversity. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Finney, Ben R. 1977. “Voyaging Canoes and the Settlement of Polynesia.” Science 196 (4296): 1277–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finney, Ben R. 1996. “Colonizing an Island World.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 86 (5): 71–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forber, Patrick, and Griffith, Eric. 2011. “Historical Reconstruction: Gaining Epistemic Access to the Deep Past.” Philosophy and Theory in Biology 3:20170609. https://doi.org/10.3998/ptb.6959004.0003.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, John F. W. 1831. Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy. London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, & Green.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyerdahl, Thor. 1990. Kon-Tiki. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. 1977. “The Structure and Strategy of Darwin’s ‘Long Argument.’” British Journal for the History of Science 10 (3): 237–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, M. J. S. 1992. “Darwin’s Argument in the Origin.” Philosophy of Science 59 (3): 461–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huldtgren, Therese, Cunningham, John A., Yin, Chongyu, Stampanoni, Marco, Marone, Federica, Donoghue, Philip C. J., and Bengtson, Stefan. 2011. “Fossilized Nuclei and Germination Structures Identify Ediacaran ‘Animal Embryos’ as Encysting Protists.” Science 334 (6063): 1696–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huldtgren, Therese, Cunningham, John A., Yin, Chongyu, Stampanoni, Marco, Marone, Federica, Donoghue, Philip C. J., and Bengtson, Stefan. 2012. “Response to Comment on ‘Fossilized Nuclei and Germination Structures Identify Ediacaran “Animal Embryos” as Encysting Protists.’” Science 335 (6073): 1169d.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffares, Ben. 2008. “Testing Times: Regularities in the Historical Sciences.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C 39 (4): 469–75.Google Scholar
Kleinhans, Maarten G., Buskes, Chris J. J., and de Regt, Henk W. 2005. “Terra Incognita: Explanation and Reduction in Earth Science.” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3): 289–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleinhans, Maarten G., Buskes, Chris J. J., and de Regt, Henk W. 2010. “Philosophy of Earth Science.” In Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide, ed. Allhoff, Fritz, 213–36. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, Andrew H., Xiao, Shuhai, and Zhang, Yun. 1998. “Three-Dimensional Preservation of Algae and Animal Embryos in a Neoproterozoic Phosphorite.” Nature 391 (6667): 553–58.Google Scholar
Kosso, Peter. 2001. Knowing the Past: Philosophical Issues of History and Archaeology. Amherst, NY: Humanity.Google Scholar
Lawler, A. 2010. “Beyond Kon-Tiki: Did Polynesians Sail to South America?” Science 328 (5984): 1344–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1966. “Stars of the Sea Road.” Journal of the Polynesian Society 75 (1): 84–94.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1994. We, the Navigators: The Ancient Art of Landfinding in the Pacific. 2nd ed. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Lipton, Peter. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno-Mayar, J. Víctor, et al. 2014. “Genome-Wide Ancestry Patterns in Rapanui Suggest Pre-European Admixture with Native Americans.” Current Biology 24 (21): 2518–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novick, Aaron, and Scholl, Raphael. 2018. “Presume It Not: True Causes in the Search for the Basis of Heredity.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, January. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Malley, Maureen A. 2016. “Histories of Molecules: Reconciling the Past.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A 55 (February): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, Emily C. 2014. “Experiments, Simulations, and Epistemic Privilege.” Philosophy of Science 81 (4): 516–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, Wendy S. 2009. “Does Matter Really Matter? Computer Simulations, Experiments, and Materiality.” Synthese 169 (3): 483–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raff, Elizabeth C., Villinski, Jeffrey T., Turner, F. Rudolf, Donoghue, Phillip C. J., and Raff, Rudolf A. 2006. “Experimental Taphonomy Shows the Feasibility of Fossil Embryos.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (15): 5846–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudwick, Martin J. S. 1964. “The Inference of Function from Structure in Fossils.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (57): 27–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholl, Raphael. 2019. “Unwarranted Assumptions: Claude Bernard and the Growth of the Vera Causa Standard.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.12.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharp, Andrew. 1966. “David Lewis’s Experimental Voyage.” Journal of the Polynesian Society 75 (2): 231–33.Google Scholar
Sober, Elliott. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution and Inference. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2006. Exceeding Our Grasp: Science, History, and the Problem of Unconceived Alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2010. “Getting Real: The Hypothesis of Organic Fossil Origins.” Modern Schoolman 87 (3): 219–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2011. “Damn the Consequences: Projective Evidence and the Heterogeneity of Scientific Confirmation.” Philosophy of Science 78 (5): 887–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2019. “Unconceived Alternatives and Conservatism in Science: The Impact of Professionalization, Peer-Review, and Big Science.” Synthese 196 (10): 3915–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorsby, Erik. 2012. “The Polynesian Gene Pool: An Early Contribution by Amerindians to Easter Island.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 367 (1590): 812–19.Google Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer. 2004. Our Knowledge of the Past: A Philosophy of Historiography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Aviezer. 2011. “Historical Science, Over- and Underdetermined: A Study of Darwin’s Inference of Origins.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (4): 805–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Derek. 2000. “The Functions of Fossils: Inference and Explanation in Functional Morphology.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C 31 (1): 193–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Derek. 2005. “Local Underdetermination in Historical Science.” Philosophy of Science 72 (1): 209–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Derek. 2007. Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Derek. 2009a. “Beyond Detective Work: Empirical Testing in Paleontology.” In The Paleobiological Revolution: Essays on the Growth of Modern Paleontology, ed. Sepkoski, David and Ruse, Michael, 201–14. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Derek. 2009b. “How Much Can We Know about the Causes of Evolutionary Trends?” Biology and Philosophy 24 (3): 341–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vezér, Martin A. 2017. “Variety-of-Evidence Reasoning about the Distant Past: A Case Study in Paleoclimate Reconstruction.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 7 (2): 257–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wylie, Alison. 1999. “Rethinking Unity as a ‘Working Hypothesis’ for Philosophy of Science: How Archaeologists Exploit the Disunities of Science.” Perspectives on Science 7 (3): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Shuhai, and Knoll, Andrew H. 1999. “Fossil Preservation in the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Phosphorite Lagerstätte, South China.” Lethaia 10 (15): 219–40.Google Scholar
Xiao, Shuhai, and Knoll, Andrew H. 2000. “Phosphatized Animal Embryos from the Neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation at Weng’an, Guizhou, South China.” Journal of Paleontology 74 (5): 767–88.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Shuhai, Knoll, Andrew H., Schiffbauer, James D., Zhou, Chuanming, and Yuan, Xunlai. 2012. “Comment on ‘Fossilized Nuclei and Germination Structures Identify Ediacaran “Animal Embryos” as Encysting Protists.’” Science 335 (6073): 1169.c.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Xi-Guang, and Pratt, Brian R. 2014. “Possible Algal Origin and Life Cycle of Ediacaran Doushantuo Microfossils with Dextral Spiral Structure.” Journal of Paleontology 88 (1): 92–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar