Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T21:11:56.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecological Interdependence via Constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Christopher H. Eliot
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although ecological theory has historically focused on negative interactions among populations, like competition and predation, ecologists and conservation biologists highlight the significance of interdependence. It is not clear, however, what is asserted in the causal hypothesis that one population is interdependent on others. This essay argues that the most informative causal regularities for representing dependencies are those connecting populations through environmental constraint variables. Interdependence among populations can thus be understood as constraint-mediated dependency relations connected in a circuit.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 85 , Issue 5 , December 2018 , pp. 1115 - 1126
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Thanks to Roberta Millstein, Alkistis Elliott-Graves, and Steven Peck for the PSA symposium and the associated discussions that inspired this article. Their comments, together with those of several symposium attendees and two anonymous referees, helped substantially with reining it in.

References

Anstett, Marie-Charlotte, Hossaert-McKey, Martine, and McKey, Doyle. 1997. “Modeling the Persistence of Small Populations of Strongly Interdependent Species: Figs and Fig Wasps.” Conservation Biology 11 (1): 204–13..10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.95436.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Allan, Gonzalez, Patricia, Morrison, R. I. G., and Harrington, Brian A.. 2013. “Red Knot (Calidris canutus), Version 2.0.” In The Birds of North America, ed. Rodewald, Paul G.. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Lab of Ornithology.Google Scholar
Bascompte, Jordi. 2009. “Disentangling the Web of Life.” Science 325 (5939): 416–19..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beatty, John. 1995. “The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis.” In Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences, ed. Wolters, Gereon and Lennox, James G., 45–81. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Carmona, R., Arce, N., Ayala-Pérez, V., Hernández-Alvarez, A., Cruz, R., and Danemann, G.. 2011. “Similarities in the Migratory Strategies in the Red Knot between the Pacific (C. c. roselaari) and Atlantic (C. c. rufa) Subspecies.” Presented at Western Hemisphere Shorebird Group Meeting IV, August 11–15, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Clements, Frederic E. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cody, Martin L., and Diamond, Jared M.. 1975. Ecology and Evolution of Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, Charles. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 1st ed. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Egerton, Frank N. 2007. “A History of the Ecological Sciences.” Pt. 23, “Linnaeus and the Economy of Nature.” Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 88 (1): 72–88..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, Christopher H. 2011. “The Legend of Order and Chaos: Communities and Early Community Ecology.” In Philosophy of Ecology, ed. Delaplante, Kevin, Brown, Bryson, and Peacock, Kent. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Forbes, Stephen Alfred. 1925. “The Lake as a Microcosm.” Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin 15 (9): 537–50..10.21900/j.inhs.v15.303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Futuyma, Douglas J. 2009. “Coevolution.” In Encyclopedia of Insects, 2nd ed., ed. Resh, Vincent H. and Cardé, Ring T., 175–79. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gause, Georgii F. 1934. The Struggle for Existence. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hagen, Joel B. 1988. “Organism and Environment: Frederic Clements’s Vision of a Unified Physiological Ecology.” In The American Development of Biology, ed. Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith R., and Maienschein, Jane, 257–80. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbell, Stephen P. 2006. “Neutral Theory and the Evolution of Ecological Equivalence.” Ecology 87 (6): 1387–98..CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karpanty, Sarah M., Fraser, James D., Berkson, Jim, Niles, Lawrence J., Dey, Amanda, and Smith, Eric P.. 2006. “Horseshoe Crab Eggs Determine Red Knot Distribution in Delaware Bay.” Journal of Wildlife Management 70 (6): 1704–10..10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[1704:HCEDRK]2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolasa, Jurek. 2011. “Theory Makes Ecology Evolve.” In The Theory of Ecology, ed. Scheiner, Samuel M. and Willig, Michael R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leopold, Aldo. 1939. “A Biotic View of Land.” Journal of Forestry 37 (9): 727–30..Google Scholar
Loreau, Michel, Mouquet, Nicolas, and Holt, Robert D.. 2003. “Meta-ecosystems: A Theoretical Framework for a Spatial Ecosystem Ecology.” Ecology Letters 6 (8): 673–79..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millstein, Roberta L. 2018. “Is Aldo Leopold’s ‘Land Community’ an Individual?” In Individuation across Theoretical and Experimental Sciences, ed. Bueno, Otávio, Chen, Ruey-Lin, and Fagan, Melinda. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra. 2002. “Ceteris Paribus: An Inadequate Representation for Biological Contingency.” Erkenntnis 57 (3): 329–50..10.1023/A:1021530311109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noss, Reed F. 1994. “Some Principles of Conservation Biology, as They Apply to Environmental Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 69 (4): 893–909..Google Scholar
Paul, L. A., and Hall, Ned. 2013. Causation: A User’s Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, Mark L. 1981. “Minimum Population Sizes for Species Conservation.” BioScience 31 (2): 131–34..10.2307/1308256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soulé, Michael E. 1985. “What Is Conservation Biology?” BioScience 35 (11): 727–34..Google Scholar
Vellend, Mark. 2016. The Theory of Ecological Communities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Waters, C. Kenneth. 1998. “Causal Regularities in the Biological World of Contingent Distributions.” Biology and Philosophy 13 (1): 5–36..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcke, C. D. [Linnaeus]. 1781. “On the Police of Nature.” In Select Dissertations from the Amoenitates Academicae, trans. Brand, FitzJohn, 129–66. London: Robinson & Robson.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. 2003. Making Things Happen: A Theory of Causal Explanation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, James, and Hitchcock, Christopher. 2003. “Explanatory Generalizations.” Pt. 1, “A Counterfactual Account.” Noûs 37 (1): 1–24..CrossRefGoogle Scholar