Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:44:12.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative Process Tracing and Climate Change Fingerprints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Wendy S. Parker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Climate change fingerprint studies investigate the causes of recent climate change. I argue that these studies have much in common with Steel's streamlined comparative process tracing, illustrating a mechanisms-based approach to extrapolation in which the mechanisms of interest are simulated rather than physically instantiated. I then explain why robustness and variety-of-evidence considerations turn out to be important for understanding the evidential value of climate change fingerprint studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 77 , Issue 5 , December 2010 , pp. 1083 - 1095
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

Thanks to Reto Knutti, Dan Steel, and Lenny Smith for helpful suggestions and discussion.

References

Allen, Myles R., and Tett, Simon F. B.. 1999. “Checking for Model Consistency in Optimal Fingerprinting.” Climate Dynamics 15:419–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Myles R., et al. 2006. “Quantifying Anthropogenic Influence on Recent Near-Surface Temperature Change.” Surveys in Geophysics 27:491–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, William, and Abrahamsen, Adele. 2010. “Dynamic Mechanistic Explanation: Computational Modeling of Circadian Rhythms as an Exemplar for Cognitive Science.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forster, Piers M., et al. 2007. “Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing.” In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Solomon, Susan et al., 129–234. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hasselmann, Klaus. 1997. “Multi-pattern Fingerprint Method for Detection and Attribution of Climate Change.” Climate Dynamics 13:601–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegerl, Gabriele C., et al. 2006. “Climate Change Detection and Attribution: Beyond Mean Temperature Signals.” Journal of Climate 19:5058–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegerl, Gabriele C.. 2007. “Understanding and Attributing Climate Change.” In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Solomon, Susan et al., 663–745. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huntingford, Chris, et al. 2006. “Incorporating Model Uncertainty into Attribution of Observed Temperature Change.” Geophysical Research Letters 33:L05710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IDAG (International Ad Hoc Detection and Attribution Group). 2005. “Detecting and Attributing External Influences on the Climate System: A Review of Recent Advances.” Journal of Climate 18:1291–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2007. “Summary for Policymakers.” In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Solomon, Susan et al., 1–18. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meehl, Gerald A., et al. 2003. “Solar and Greenhouse Gas Forcing and Climate Response in the Twentieth Century.” Journal of Climate 16:426–44.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meehl, Gerald A.. 2004. “Combinations of Natural and Anthropogenic Forcings in Twentieth-Century Climate.” Journal of Climate 17:3721–27.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, John F. B., et al. 2001. “Detection of Climate Change and Attribution of Causes.” In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis; Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, ed. Houghton, John T. et al., 695–738. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Santer, Benjamin D., et al. 2003. “Contributions of Anthropogenic and Natural Forcing to Recent Tropopause Height Changes.” Science 301:479–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santer, Benjamin D.. 2009. “Incorporating Model Quality Information in Detection and Attribution Studies.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (35): 14778–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steel, Daniel P. 2008. Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in Biology and Social Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stott, Peter A., Allen, Myles R., and Jones, Gareth S.. 2003. “Estimating Signal Amplitudes in Optimal Fingerprinting. Part II: Application to General Circulation Models.” Climate Dynamics 21:493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tett, Simon F. B., et al. 1999. “Causes of Twentieth-Century Temperature Change Near Earth's Surface.” Nature 399:569–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Xuebin, Zwiers, Francis W., and Stott, Peter A.. 2006. “Multimodel Multisignal Climate Change Detection at Regional Scale.” Journal of Climate 19:4294–4307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar