Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:14:18.430Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Temperature Dependence of DC Conductivity in Ion-Beam-Irradiated Glassy Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Dougal McCulloch
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics and Microelectronics and Materials Research Center and Dipankar Sengupta, Department of Communications & Electrical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia.
Steven Prawer
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics and Microelectronics and Materials Research Center and Dipankar Sengupta, Department of Communications & Electrical Engineering, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, Victoria, 3001, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The electrical conductivity of ion beam irradiated Glassy Carbon has been investigated in the temperature range 100 to 300 K. Ion species used were C+ and N+ with doses between 1014 and 1018 ions/cm2. Ion beam irradiation was found to lower the conductivity of Glassy Carbon by up to six orders of magnitude. The temperature dependence of the conductivity in ion beam modified Glassy Carbon has been measured. The functional dependence was found to remain largely unchanged by ion irradiation despite the large overall decrease in the conductivity. The results are interpreted in terms of a model which includes a variable range hopping and strongly scattering metallic components.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Jenkins, G.M. & Kawamura, K., Polymeric Carbons- Carbon Fibre Glass and Char, (Cambridge Uni. Press, 1976).Google Scholar
2. Pollock, J.T.A., Kenny, M. J., Wielunski, L.S. and Scott, M.D., NATO workshop on theory and applications of Ion beam modified Ceramics, Pisa, Italy (Sept. 1988).Google Scholar
3. Prawer, S., Ninio, F. and Blanchonette, I., J. Appl. Phys., 68, 2361 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Prawer, S., McCulloch, D., Rossouw, CJ. and Glanvill, S. in Surface Modification Technologies III, p. 89, (1990).Google Scholar
5. McCulloch, D. and Prawer, S. Beam Solid Interactions:Physical Phenomina (Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. Boston 1989).Google Scholar
6. Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P. and Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, (Pergamon, N.Y. 1988).Google Scholar
7. McCulloch, D., Sood, D. and Prawer, S. (unpublished observations).Google Scholar
8. Saxena, R.R. and Bragg, R.H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 28, 45 (1978).Google Scholar
9. Baker, D.F. and Bragg, R.H., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 58, 57 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Klein, C.A., Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 56 (1962).Google Scholar
11. Mason, I.B., Industrial Carbon and Graphite, (Society of Chemical Industry, London), 60 (1958).Google Scholar
12. Mott, N.F. and Davis, E.A., Electronic Processes in Non-Crystalline Material, 2nd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford 1979).Google Scholar
13. Hauser, J.J., J. NonCryst. Solids 23, 21 (1977).Google Scholar
14. Murakami, M., Yasujima, H. and Yumoto, Y., Mizogami, S. and Yoshimura, S., Sol. Stat. Comm. 45, 1085 (1983).Google Scholar
15. Ueno, H. and Yoshino, K., Phys. Rev. B 34, 7158 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Hauser, J.J., Patel, J.R. and Rodgers, J.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 129 (1977).Google Scholar