Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T08:37:51.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface Dynamics of GaAs Thin Film Formation by Pulsed Laser Deposition Investigated Using RHEED

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

A. Pun
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida A&M University and Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
S.M. Durbin
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NEW ZEALAND
J. Kennedy
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, NEW ZEALAND
A. Markwitz
Affiliation:
Institute of Geological & Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, NEW ZEALAND
R. Reeves
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Canterbury, NEW ZEALAND
J.P. Zheng
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Florida A&M University and Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
Get access

Abstract

Post-growth surface dynamics of epitaxial GaAs (100) thin films grown by pulsed laser deposition (PLD) have been studied using dynamic reflection high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) in an effort to better understand the growth mechanisms present in pulsed laser deposition. Results have indicated, as expected, that processes occurring at reduced substrate temperatures manifest themselves more slowly than at elevated temperatures. This has been shown through the analysis of static RHEED images and dynamic specular beam intensity as well as profile scans.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] McCamy, J. W. and Aziz, M. J., MRS Society Symposia Proceedings 441, 621 (1997).Google Scholar
[2] Zheng, J. P., Huang, Z. Q., Shaw, D. T., and Kwok, H. S., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 954 (1989).Google Scholar
[3] Cheung, N. H., Ying, Q. Y., Zheng, J. P., and Kwok, H. S., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 553 (1991).Google Scholar
[4] Toyoshima, H., Shitara, T., Zheng, J., Neave, J. H., and Joyce, B. A., Surface Sci. 264, 10 (1992).Google Scholar
[5] Neave, J. H., Joyce, B. A., and Dobson, P. J., Appl. Phys. A 34, 179(1984).Google Scholar
[6] Joyce, B. A., Dobson, P. J., and Neave, J. H., Surface Sci. 179, 1 (1986).Google Scholar
[7] Clarke, S. and Vvedensky, D. D., J. Crystal Growth 95, 28 (1989).Google Scholar
[8] Neave, J. H. and Joyce, B. A., Appl. Phys A 31, 1 (1983).Google Scholar
[9] Joyce, B. A., Shitara, T., Yoshinaga, A., Vvedensky, D. D., Neave, J. H., and Zhang, J., Appl. Surface Sci. 60/61, 200 (1992).Google Scholar
[10] Yoshinaga, A., Fahy, M., Dosanjh, S., Zhang, J., Neave, J. H., and Joyce, B. A., Surface Sc. Lett. 264, L157 (1992).Google Scholar
[11] Clark, S. and Vvedensky, D. D., Surface Science 189/190, 1033 (1987).Google Scholar
[12] Clark, S., Vvedensky, D. D., and Ricketts, M. W., J. Crystal Growth 95, 28 (1989).Google Scholar
[13] Lewis, B. F., Grunthaner, F. J., Madhukar, A., Lee, T. C., and Fernandez, R., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B 3, 1317 (1985).Google Scholar