Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:39:58.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure/Property Relationships of Seashells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

David J. Scurr  and
Stephen J. Eichhorn
David J. Scurr
Affiliation:
Materials Science Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Grosvenor St. Manchester, England, M1 7HS
Stephen J. Eichhorn
Affiliation:
Materials Science Centre, School of Materials, University of Manchester, Grosvenor St. Manchester, England, M1 7HS
Get access

Abstract

This study uses various characterisation techniques on the razor shell (Ensis siliqua), to relate the shell's microstructure to its mechanical properties. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has shown that the outer and inner regions of the shell are composed of simple and complex crossed lamellar microstructures respectively. These layers are interspersed by prismatic layers of a completely different crystallographic orientation. Nanoindentation and microhardness measurements have shown that the structure is anisotropic, and Raman band shifts have been observed within these indented/deformed areas of shell, showing that the microstructure deforms rather than generating surface damage. The use of energy variable synchrotron X-ray diffraction has shown that the calcium carbonate crystals of the shell are preferentially orientated as a function of depth and that opposing residual stresses exist at the outer and inner regions of the shell. This study has analysed several microstructural features of the shell and provided an insight into how they prevent failure of the material.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 844: Symposium Y – Mechanical Properties of Bio-Inspired and Biological Materials , 2004 , Y4.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wiener, S., and Addadi, L., J. Mater. Chem., 5, 689–702 (1997)Google Scholar
2. Bøggild, O.B., D. Kgl…Dankse Vidensk. Selsk. Skr. (Naturvidensk og mathem.). 9/2, 231–326 (1930)Google Scholar
3. Kobayashi, I., Am. Zoologist, 9, 663–672 (1969)Google Scholar
4. Nakahara, H., Kakei, M., and Bevelander, G., The Veliger, 23, 207–211 (1982)Google Scholar
5. Kuhn-Spearing, L.T., Kessler, H., Chateau, E., Ballarini, R., Heuer, A.H., J. Mater. Sci, 31, 6583–6594 (1996)Google Scholar
6. Vermeij, J., A Natural history of Shells, Princeton University Press, New Jersey (1993)Google Scholar
7. Currey, J.D., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, 196, 443–463 (1977)Google Scholar
8. Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V., and Turner, R.M., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 234, 415–440 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Kamat, S., Su, X., Ballarini, R., and Heuer, A.H., Nature. 405, 1036–1040 (2000)Google Scholar
10. Pokroy, B., and Zolotoyabko, E., J. Mater. Chem. 13, 682–688 (2003)Google Scholar
11. Eichhorn, S.J., Scurr, D.J., Mummery, P.M., Golshan, M., Thomson, S.P., and Cernik, R.J., J. Mater. Chem. DOI:1039/B407994AGoogle Scholar
12. Parratt, L.G., Physical Review. 92, 359–369, (1954)Google Scholar
13. Marquadt, D.W., J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431 (1963)Google Scholar
14. Jayaraman, A., Rev. Sci. Instr. 57, 1013 (1986)Google Scholar
15. Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992)Google Scholar
16. Batchelder, D.N., and Bloor, D., J. Polymer. Sci. 17, 569–581 (1979)Google Scholar