Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T06:06:47.762Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sol-Gel Synthesis of Protoenstatite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Steven A. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
James M. Burlitch
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853
Get access

Abstract

Protoenstatite, a high-temperature polymorph of enstatite (MgSiO3), is generally not stable at room temperature, and is difficult to synthesize. Using a recently developed, hydrogen peroxide-assisted, sol-gel synthesis, protoenstatite was synthesized in a form that was stable at room temperature. Its crystallization was strongly dependent on processing conditions, particularly on the manner in which the xerogel was formed and fired. Xerogels prepared by evaporation, sprav-drying and freeze-drying were compared by XRD, HTXRD, BET, TG/DTA, and 29Si NMR methods. When samples were prepared by evaporation or spray-drying, the result was a mixture of polymorphs. Only the freeze-dried precursor yielded protoenstatite at a lower temperature and within a shorter time than any previously reported.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Atlas, L., J. Geol. 60, 125 (1952).Google Scholar
2 Smith, J. V., Mineral. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 2, 3 (1969).Google Scholar
3 Smyth, J. R., Am. Mineral. 59, 345 (1974).Google Scholar
4 Buseck, P. R., Nord, J. and Veblen, D. R. in Subsolidus Phenomena in Pyroxenes, edited by C. Prewitt, T. (Mineral. Soc. Am. 7, Washington, 1980) p 117. G. L. Google Scholar
5 Uda, T., U. S. Patent No. 63 25, 558 (1986).Google Scholar
6 Majima, T., Kawase, M. and Terrauchi, Y., U. S. Patent No. 63 190, 637 (1988).Google Scholar
7 Smith, J. V., Acta Cryst. 12, 515 (1959).Google Scholar
8 Yamaguchi, O., Nakajima, Y., Takeoka, K. and Shimizu, K., Funtai Oyobi Funmatsu Yakin 23, (1976).Google Scholar
9 Usov, P. G., Gurina, V. N. and Sobora, N. V., Izv. Tomsk. Politekh. Inst. 197, 110 (1975).Google Scholar
10 Usov, P. G., Gurina, V. N. and Sobora, N. V., Izv. Tomsk. Politekh. Inst. 238, 122 (1977).Google Scholar
11 Lee, W. E. and Heuer, A. H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70, 349 (1987).Google Scholar
12 Burlitch, J. M., U. S. Patent No. 5019293 (1991).Google Scholar
13 Burlitch, J. M., Beeman, M. L., Riley, B. and Kohlstedt, D. L., Chem. Mater. 3, 692 (1991).Google Scholar
14 McClune, W. F.; Powder Diffraction File (JCPDS, Swarthmore, PA, 1979) File no. 19–768.Google Scholar
15 McClune, W. F.; Powder Diffraction File (JCPDS, Swarthmore, PA, 1990) File no. 35–610.Google Scholar
16 Berry, L. G.; Powder diffraction File (JCPDS, Swarthmore, PA, 1972) File no. 11–273.Google Scholar
17 Jones, S. A. and Burlitch, J. M., unpublished observations (1993).Google Scholar
18 Smith, K. A., Kirkpatrick, R. J., Oldfield, E. and Henderson, D. M., Am. Miner. 68, 1206 (1983).Google Scholar