Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:44:04.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships Between Permeability And Microstructural Characteristics Of Fly Ash Mortars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Robert L. Day  and
Ladislav Konecny
Robert L. Day
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N IN4
Ladislav Konecny
Affiliation:
Ontario Hydro, 800 Kipling Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M8Z 5S4.
Get access

Abstract

The paper describes research to evaluate permeability and the microstructure of mortars containing fly ash as a partial replacement for cement. The replacement levels of cement by fly ash were 35 and 50% by volume and 50% by weight; effectiveness of mortars made with four types of fly ash at two water/cement ratios, 0.47 and 0.65, were assessed. Three types of permeability measurements were made: (a) water permeability, (b) oxygen permeability and (c) permeability to chloride ion by the 6-hour rapid permeability test. Measurements were performed at 7, 28 and 160 days age. Strength gain in the mortar mixes was also monitored. In an attempt to explain trends observed in permeability, the pore structures of oven-dried and solventexchanged specimens were examined by mercury porosimetry. Mortars manufactured with fly ash displayed superior engineering properties when compared to the control mortars. Significant correlations were found among measurements of permeability by water, oxygen and chloride ion. Relationships were also observed between permeability and some microstructural indicators, especially the volume of mercury intruded up to a pressure of 41 MPa (6000 psi).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 137: Symposium P – Pore Structure and Permeability of Cementitious Materials , 1988 , 391
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. The Concrete Society, Permeability of Concrete and its Control, papers for a one-day Conference, London, (The Concrete Society, Devon House, 12–15 Dartmouth St., London), Dec. 1985 Google Scholar
2. Hooton, R.D., Proc. of the Engineering Foundation Conf. on Advances in Cement Manufacture and Use, Potosi, Missouri, July 31-Aug 5, 1988 Google Scholar
3. Day, R.L., Joshi, R.C., Langan, B.W., and Ward, M.A., Proc. 5th Intnl. Ash Symposium,Orlando, V. 2, 811, (1985)Google Scholar
4. Figg, J.W., Mag. Concr. Res., 25 (85), 213, (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Mills, R.H., a report prepared for the Atomic Energy Control Board, Ottawa, Canada, July 1983 Google Scholar
6. Whiting, D., report prepared for Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., by Construction Technology Laboratories, a Division of PCA, Skokie, Ill., Aug., (1981)Google Scholar
7. Marsh, B.K., Day, R.L., Bonner, D.G., Cem. Concr. Res., 15 (6), 1027, (1985)Google Scholar
8. Malek, R.I.A., Roy, D.M. and Licastro, P.H., in Microstructural Development During Hydration of Cement, ed. by Struble, L.J. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 85, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) 223–232 Google Scholar
9. Hooton, R.D., Blended Cements, Amer. Soc. for Testing & Materials, STP 897, 128–143, 1986 Google Scholar
10. Diab, H., Bentur, A., Heitner-Wirguin, C. and Ben-dor, L., Cem. Concr. Res, 18 (5), 715–722, 1988 Google Scholar
11. Li, S. and Roy, D.M., Cem. Concr. Res., 16 (5), 749–759, 1986 Google Scholar
12. Day, R.L. and Marsh, B.K., Cem. Concr. Res., 18 (1), 63–73, (1988)Google Scholar
13. Mehta, P.K. and Manmohan, D., Proc. 7th Intnl. Congress on Chem. of Cement, Paris, V III, pp VII: 1–5, (1980)Google Scholar
14. Feldman, R.F., Journ. Amer. Ceramic Soc., 67 (1), 30–33 (1984)Google Scholar
15. Marsh, B.K., Day, R.L., in Very High Strength Cement-Based Materials, edited by Young, J.F., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 42, Pittsburgh, PA, 1985) pp 113–121 Google Scholar
16. Shi, D. and Winslow, D.N., Cem. Concr. Res., 15 (4), 645–654, (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Konecny, L., M.Sc. thesis, University of Calgary, Dept. of Civil Engineering, July, (1987)Google Scholar
18. Powers, T.C., Copeland, L.E., Hayes, J.C. and Mann, H.M., Journ. Amer. Concr. Inst., 26 (3), 285–298, (1954)Google Scholar
19. Nyame, B.K., Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of London, King's College, (1979)Google Scholar
20. Marsh, B.K., Ph.D. thesis, The Hatfield Polytechnic, Feb, (1984)Google Scholar
21. Mendenhal, W. and Sincich, T., Statistics for the Enpineering and Comouter Sciences, Collier MacMillan Publishers, (1988)Google Scholar