Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T03:39:06.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Real-Time XRD Characterization of Growth of Sputtered Tantalum Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

S. L. Lee*
Affiliation:
US Army Armament Research Development and Engineering Center Benét Labs, Watervliet, NY 12189–4050
J. Mueller
Affiliation:
US Army Armament Research Development and Engineering Center Benét Labs, Watervliet, NY 12189–4050
D. Windover
Affiliation:
US Army Armament Research Development and Engineering Center Benét Labs, Watervliet, NY 12189–4050
*
* Dr. S.L. Lee, 518–266–5503, sabrilee@pica.army.mil
Get access

Abstract

An in-situ DC magnetron sputter deposition system was constructed on the goniometer of an X-ray diffractometer for investigation of thin film nucleation and growth in real time. Tantalum films were deposited on silicon and A723 steel substrates under various deposition conditions. This paper showed: 1) Ta films evolved in single or mixed α-Ta and β-Ta phase on Si and Fe with very different growth characteristics. 2) Crystalline phase was sensitive to deposition mechanics, Ta film changed phase spontaneously without external parameter changes. 3) In pressure range 0.65–13 Pa at 100 watts, phase was not sensitive to pressure variations, but deposition rate and degree of texture decreased at high gas pressure. 4) Depositions using heavier gas showed higher a-Ta concentrations. 5) Reverse sputter cleaning of target and substrate surfaces improved Ta film adhesion.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

+

Dr. D. Windover is currently a National Research Council Fellow, NIST, Gettysburg, MD

References

REFERENCES

1. Legg, K.O., Graham, M., Chang, P., Rastagar, F., Gonzales, A., Sartwell, B., Surf. Coat. Tech., Vol. 81, Issue 1, May 1996, 99105, 1996.Google Scholar
2. Matson, D.W., Merz, M.D., and McClanahan, E.D., J. of Vac. Sci. and Tech. A, Vol. 10 (1992), 1791.Google Scholar
3. Matson, D.W., McClanahan, W.D., Lee, S.L., Surf. Coat. Tech, Vol. 133–134 Nov. (2000) 411.Google Scholar
4. Matson, D.W., McClanahan, E.D., Lee, S.L., Surf. Coat. Tech. 146–147 (2001) 344.Google Scholar
5. Lee, S.L. and Windover, D., Surf. Coat. Tech. 108/109 (1998), 65.Google Scholar
6. Lee, S.L., Cipollo, M., Windover, D., Rickard, C., Surf. Coat. Tech. 120–121 (1999), 44.Google Scholar
7. Lee, S.L., Windover, D., Audino, M., Matson, D.W., McClanahan, E.D., Surf. Coat. Tech. 149 (2002), 62.Google Scholar
8. Gladczuk, L., Patel, A., Paur, C.S. and Sosnowski, M., Thin Solid Films, Vol. 467, Issues 1–2, 22 Nov (2004) 150.Google Scholar
9. Clevenger, L.A., Mutscheller, A., Harper, J.M.E., Cabral, C., Barmak, K., J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 72, No. 10 15 Nov (1992), 4918.Google Scholar
10. Thorton, J.A., Semiconductor Materials and Process technology Handbook, McGuire, G.E., Ed., Noyes (1988) 329.Google Scholar
11. Ino, K., Shinohara, T., Ushikai, T., and Ohmi, T., J. of Vac. Sci. Tech. A Vol. 15 (1997) 2627.Google Scholar
12. Whitacre, J.F., Yalisove, S.M., Bilello, J.C., Mat. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc. Vol 562 (1999) 141.Google Scholar
13. Whitacre, J.F., Ph.D. Dissertation, Univ. of Michigan (2000).Google Scholar
14. Windover, D., Ph.D. Dissertation, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (2002).Google Scholar
15. Lee, S.L., Windover, D., Lu, T.-M., Audino, M., Thin Solid Films, Vol. 420–421, (2002) 287.Google Scholar
16. Windischmann, H., Crit. Rev. in Solid State and Mater. Sci., Vol 17, No. 6 (1992) 547.Google Scholar