Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T23:15:42.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance of Cement-Basedseal Systemcomponents Inawaste Disposal Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Philip G. Malone
Affiliation:
U.S.Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
Lillian D. Wakeley
Affiliation:
U.S.Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
J.Pete Burkes
Affiliation:
U.S.Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS 39180-6199
Andearl W. Mcdaniel
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Get access

Abstract

A grout based on portland cement, Class F fly ash, and bentonite clay was developed as part of the closure system of shallow subsurface structures for disposal of low-activity radioactive wastes. Heat output, volume change, and compressive strength of the sealing grout were monitored with time, at elevated temperature, and in physical models, to determine if this closure grout could maintain adequate volume stability and other required physical properties in the internal environment of the disposal structure.

To determine if contact with an alkaline liquid waste would cause chemical deterioration of the sealing grout, cured specimens were immersed in a liquid waste simulant containing high concentrations of sodium and aluminum salts. Over a period of 21 days at 60 °C, specimens increased in mass without significant changes in volume. X-ray diffraction of reacted specimens revealed crystallization of sodium aluminum silicate hydrate.

The new phase has an X-ray diffraction pattern similar to that of the commercial syntheticzeolite, Losod. Scanning electron microscopy used with X-ray fluorescence showed that clusters of this phase had formed in grout pores, to increase grout density and decrease its effective porosity. The testing was repeated at 100 °C for 5 days using a simulant containing sodium hydroxide and aluminum nitrate and the results were similar. Physical and chemical tests collectively indicate acceptable performance of this grout as a seal-system component.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wakeley, L.D., McDaniel, E.W., Voogd, J., Ernzen, J.J. in Fourth CANMET/ACI International Conference on Fly Ash Silica Fume, Slag and Natural Pozzolans in Concrete, Supplementary Papers, (American Concrete Institute, Detroit, MI, 1992), pp. 114.Google Scholar
2. Wakeley, L.D. and Ernzen, J.J. in Advanced Cementitious Systems: Mechanisms and Properties, edited by Glasser, F. P. et al. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 245, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 117122.Google Scholar
3. Wakeley, L.D. and Ernzen, J.J., Grout for Closure of the Demonstration Vault at the DOE Hanford Facility, (U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, 1992, Technical Report SL-92-21), 25 pp.Google Scholar
4. Amer. Soc. for Testing and Materials, Standard Test Methods for Chemical Analysis of Hydraulic Cement, Designation: C 114–88, 1992.Google Scholar
5. Barrer, R.M., Hydrothermal Chemistry of Zeolites, (Academic Press, New York, 1982), p. 230.Google Scholar
6. Grutzeck, M.J., Air Force Office of Scientific Research Report, PSU-AFOSR-91, 1991.Google Scholar
7. Sieber, W. and Meir, W.M., Helv. Chem. Acta 57, 1533 (1974).Google Scholar