Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:32:36.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nanostructural Studies by MÖssbauer Spectroscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Georgia C. Papaefthymiou
Georgia C. Papaefthymiou*
Affiliation:
Francis Bitter National Magnet Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

Application of 57Fe MÖssbauer spectroscopy to the determination of magnetic structural parameters relevant to nanostructural studies is discussed. Variable temperature and applied magnetic field strength investigations are considered in order to illustrate the power of the technique in rendering a microscopic picture of the internal spin structure and dynamical spin relaxation phenomena associated with nanoscale systems. Examples from biology and chemistry, where iron aggregates of nanometer dimensions are encountered, are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 332: Symposium U – Determining Nanoscale Physical Properties of Materials by Microscopy and Spectroscopy , 1994 , 261
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Kündig, W., Bömmel, H., Constabaris, G., and Lindquist, R.H., Phys. Rev. 142, 327 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Morup, S., Topsoe, H., and Lipka, J., J. de Phys. 37, C6–287 (1976).Google Scholar
3. Coey, J.M.D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1140 (1971); A.E. Berkowitz et al., 34, 594 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Shen, T., Weissleder, R., Papisov, M., Bogdanov, A. Jr., and Brady, T.J., Magn. Res. in. Med. 29, 599 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Papaefthymiou, G.C., Phys. Rev. B 46, 10366 (1992); in On Clusters and Clustering. From Atoms to Fractals, Ch. 16, PJ. Reynolds, Ed. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1993) pp. 209-220, and references therein.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Yang, C., Meagher, A., Huynh, B.H., Sayers, D.E., and Theil, E.C., Biochemistry 26, 497 (1987); R.B. Frankel, G.C. Papaefthymiou, and G.D. Watt, Hyperfine Inter. 66, 71 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hirsch, A.A., Massalha, T., and Galecki, G., JMMM 75,209 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Zhou, X.Z., Morrish, A.H., Naugle, D.G., and Pan, R., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 6597 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Schuele, W.J., Strikman, S., and Treves, D., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 101 (1965); W.F. Brown, Jr., J. Appl. Phys. 30, 1305 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Stark, D.D. et al. , Radiology 168, 297 (1988); R. Weissleder et al., 166, 423 (1988); S. Saini et al., 162, 217 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. MacNabb, T.K. et al. , J. Appl. Phys. 39, 5703 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Hardy, P.A. and Henkelman, R.M., Mag. Res. Imag. 7, 265 (1989); P. Gillis and S.H. Koening, Magn. Res. in Med. 4, 323 (1984); S. Majamdar and J.C. Gore, J. Magn. Res. 77, 41 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Weatherall, D.J. and Cleg, J.B., The Thalassemia Syndromes. 2nd ed. (Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford, 1972).Google Scholar
14. Polliack, A. et al. , Br. J. Haematol. 26, 201 (1974); L.M. Buja and W.C. Roberts, Am. J. Med. 51, 209 (1971); M.A. Engle, Am. NY Acad. Sci. 119,694 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Kaufman, K.S., Papaefthymiou, G.C., Frankel, R.B., and Rosenthal, A., Biochim. Biophys. Acta 629, 522 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Messmer, R.P. et al. , Phys. Rev. B. 13, 1396 (1976); C.Y. Yang et al., 24,5673 (1981); G.M. Pastor et al., 40, 7642 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Gorun, S.M., Papaefthymiou, G.C., Frankel, R.B., and Lippard, S.J., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 3337 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Chowdhury, D., Spin Glasses and Other Frustrated Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. The dipole-dipole interaction energy µ1µ2/r3 ∼ 10−20 ergs for two magnetic dipoles of 1µB each separated by a distance r = 20 Å, which is much weaker than either thermal energies kBT for the lowest temperature used in these experiments, or the orientation energy of each dipole - µ.H0 in the external field of 80 kOe, both of which are of the order of 10−16 ergs.Google Scholar